Working Group 3, subgroup tasked with the 3rd topic: PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Working Group 3, subgroup tasked with the 3rd topic:


1
Working Group 3, subgroup tasked with the 3rd
topic Leveraging LBS and Emerging Location
Technologies for Indoor Wireless E9-1-1
March 6, 2013 Stephen J. Wisely Richard
Craig, Co-Chairs Leveraging LBS
Subgroup Co-Leaders Ryan Jensen T-Mobile Wayn
e Ballantyne Motorola Mobility
2
Work Group 3 Areas of Focus
Outdoor Report Issued Work Effort Completed
Indoor Report Issued Work Effort on Test Bed
Completed February 2013
Completed February 2013
3
Working Group 3 Name
  • Description Leveraging Commercial Location-Based
    Services
  • The Working Group shall explore and make
    recommendations on methodologies for leveraging
    commercial location-based services for 9-1-1
    location determination and provide
    recommendations on the feasibility or
    appropriateness for the Commission to adopt
    operational benchmarks that will allow consumers
    to evaluate carriers ability to provide accurate
    location information

4
Participants
WG 3 Leveraging LBS Emerging Location
Technologies for Indoor Wireless E9-11 Subgroup
consisted of the following members
First Name Last Name Organization
Brett Schneider Bexar Metro 9-1-1 Network District
DeWayne Sennett ATIS
Norman Shaw Polaris Wireless, Inc.
Susan Sherwood Verizon Wireless
Girish Sivaram TeleCommunications Systems, Inc. (TSC)
John Snapp Intrado, Inc.
Dorothy Spears-Dean Virginia Information Technologies Agency
Bill Tortoriello US Cellular
Greg Turetzky CSR Technology Inc.
Bruce Wilson Qualcomm Inc.
Stephen Wisely APCO International
Richard Deh-Min Wu Nokia Siemens Networks


First Name Last Name Organization
Wayne Ballantyne Motorola Mobility LLC
Andrew Beck CommScope
Richard Craig Verizon Wireless
Khaled Dessouky TechnoCom Corporation
Thomas Dombrowsky Wiley Rein LLP
Jeanna Green Sprint
Roger Hixson NENA
Ryan Jensen T-Mobile
Marte Kinder Time Warner Cable
Sandra Lott CenturyLink
Mike Loushine Applied Communication Sciences
Barry Martin Boeing
Kathy McMahon APCO International
Martin Moody Metro Emergency Services Board
Gary Parsons NextNav LLC
Ganesh Pattabiranan NextNav LLC
Gustavo Pavon True Position, Inc.
Raghavendhra Rao ATT
Chuck Ronshagen Cassidian Communications
5
Working Group 3, Leveraging LBS report - Work
Completed
  • Final report covering
  • Location Technologies now used only for LBS, but
    which may be adaptable for Indoor E9-1-1
  • Emerging Location Technologies that could
    possibly be used for Indoor E9-1-1
  • For each of these technologies, assessment of
  • Accuracy and Time-to-First-Fix (TTFF)
  • Location yield
  • Network Impact
  • Handset Impact
  • Standards Implications
  • Database creation and maintenance issues

6
Working Group 3, Leveraging LBS report - Work
Completed (cont.)
  • The following location technologies were
    analyzed
  • WiFi-based Location
  • Metropolitan beacon
  • O-TDOA for LTE
  • RF Fingerprinting
  • Low-earth Orbit Satellite-based Positioning
  • Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) Positioning
  • Assisted-GNSS
  • Hybrid Positioning using Multiple Location and
    Inertial Navigation Sensors
  • Role of the Test Bed
  • Only technologies that participated in the test
    bed had detailed parametric accuracy, yield, and
    TTFF claims shown in the Leveraging LBS report

7
Working Group 3, Leveraging LBS report
Summary Next Steps
  • The diversity of location technologies reviewed
    in this report confirms that continual advances
    are being made in the field. Additionally, all
    the technologies discussed lend themselves to
    hybridization, i.e., the blending of measurements
    from multiple technologies to increase yield, and
    possibly accuracy. However, very few of these
    location technologies are currently available for
    E-9-1-1 use indoors. Three location technologies
    participated in the Indoor Test Bed. Based on
    the results, the workgroup believes that good
    progress is being made in addressing the indoor
    location challenge however, significantly more
    work needs to be done, including characterization
    of additional technologies in a Phase 2 test bed.
  • We recommend establishment of subsequent Test Bed
    trials to evaluate future technologies, such as
    WiFi, GLONASS, U-TDOA, and O-TDOA for LTE

8
Working Group 3, Leveraging LBS report -
Project Timeline
  • Kick-off Meeting March 2012, _at_ Motorola Mobility,
    Plantation FL
  • Weekly Conference Calls in between all F2F
    meetings
  • June 2012 F2F, _at_ NextNav, Santa Clara, CA
  • Scope of report finalized
  • Technology assessment criteria agreed upon
  • August 2012 F2F at St. Paul MN Metropolitan
    Emergency Services Board
  • October 2012 F2F in Verizon HQ-DC
  • November 2012 Lockdown on new technologies to be
    reviewed
  • January 2013 F2F at Qualcomm Santa Clara
  • Essential agreement on final content
  • February 19 100 completion of final report
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com