The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic Review

Description:

The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic Review Counseling the Procrastinator in Academic Settings Piers Steel www.procrastinus.com Overview Study details ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: janette6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic Review


1
The Nature of Procrastination A Meta-Analytic
Review
Counseling the Procrastinator in Academic
Settings Piers Steelwww.procrastinus.com
2
Overview
  • Study details
  • Procrastination findings
  • Procrastination and performance
  • Weak correlates
  • Strong correlates
  • Traits tasks
  • Theory of procrastination
  • Treatment implications

3
Meta-Analysis A Review
  • A well-established methodology for mathematically
    summarizing a large body of knowledge
  • Results are more precise than any single study
  • Much of the variation we see among studies is due
    to error alone
  • A meta-analysis can help eliminate that error and
    determine the true relationships

4
Study Details
  • Almost 500 studies have been written that deal
    with procrastination directly
  • These studies contain over 600 relevant
    correlations
  • Key terms
  • K Number of Samples/Studies Conducted
  • N Total Sample Size
  • Correlations Effect Size
  • Weak ? .20
  • Medium ? .30
  • Large ? .40

5
Definition of Procrastination
  • Three key components
  • Overwhelmingly referred to as a negative
    phenomenon often seen as irrational
  • We delay voluntarily, it is our choice
  • We intend to do the task, not to avoid it
    entirely
  • To voluntarily delay an intended course of action
    despite expecting to be worse-off for the delay

6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
Procrastination Performance
  • Over all, a weak (r-.19, K34, N6,295) but
    consistently negative relationship with academic
    criteria (e.g., GPA, Exam, etc.)
  • Procrastination is usually harmful, sometimes
    harmless, but never helpful
  • More serious results for financial/career
    performance
  • Correlations are negative and moderate to strong
    in strength

9
Weak Correlates
  • These relationships have long been suspected of
    being major causes of procrastination
  • Rebelliousness, Sensation-Seeking, Neuroticism,
    and Irrational beliefs
  • Results here indicate, however, that they
    generally either are
  • Weak causes of procrastination
  • Strong causes only for a small percentage of
    people

10
Rebelliousness
  • Theory
  • Externally imposed schedules are more likely
    experienced as aversive, and thus avoided. Also,
    by delaying work and starting it on ones own
    schedule, autonomy is reasserted.
  • Results (K21, N4,350)
  • Almost no support
  • Correlations extremely weak
  • Except for adolescents, few report it as a reason

11
Sensation-Seeking
  • Theory
  • People high in this trait are easily bored and
    long for excitement, and thus they may
    intentionally put off work to feel the tension of
    working close to a deadline.
  • Results (K9, N1,810)
  • Almost no support
  • Correlations extremely weak
  • Few endorse it as a reason

12
Neuroticism Anxiety
  • Theory
  • People procrastinate on tasks because they are
    more susceptible to experiencing stress and thus
    find them more stressful
  • Results (K44, N8,540)
  • Little support
  • Correlations mostly weak and where strong, due to
    impulsiveness
  • Procrastination seems to cause anxiety, not
    vice-versa

13
Irrational Beliefs
  • Theory
  • Acts similarly to neuroticism. These beliefs
    create anxiety and thus make certain tasks
    unpleasant.
  • Results (K65, N12,072)
  • Little support
  • Correlations mostly weak, except for general
    irrational beliefs where it may be moderate
  • Fear of failure and perfectionism are extremely
    low
  • Self-perfectionists actually may be less likely
    to procrastinate

14
Self-Handicapping
  • Self-handicapping is when people place obstacles
    that hinder their own good performance.
  • The motivation for self-handicapping is often to
    protect self-esteem by giving people an external
    reason, an out, if they fail to do well
  • Strong empirical relationship
  • Unclear whether it is associated only with the
    delay component of procrastination or also with
    the irrational element (may be intentional)
  • May just share the common source of low
    self-efficacy

15
Strong Correlates
  • These relationships are generally more recently
    seen as major causes of procrastination
  • Traits Self-Efficacy, Energy, Impulsiveness
    Self-Discipline, Achievement Motivation
  • Task Characteristics Aversiveness, Delay
  • Results here indicate they either describe or
    cause procrastination

16
Low Self-Efficacy Self-Esteem
  • Theory
  • Related to irrational beliefs in that people may
    doubt their ability to do well
  • Results (K26, N4,217 K33, N5,846)
  • Good support
  • For self-efficacy, strong correlations. Helps to
    explain the moderate relationship sometimes seen
    with irrational belief inventories.
  • For self-esteem, moderate to weak correlations

17
Depression Energy
  • Theory
  • Related to irrational beliefs and low
    self-efficacy. Burka and Yuen (1983) also discuss
    how it is harder to initiate tasks when we are
    tired.
  • Results (K53, N10,233)
  • Moderate support
  • Depressed people are more pessimistic about
    outcomes.
  • They are lethargic and thus more likely to find
    energy-intensive tasks unpleasant.

18
Impulsiveness Self-Discipline
  • Theory
  • Impulsive people may be more likely to
    procrastinate as they are beset with desires of
    the moment and focus their attention upon them.
  • Results (K17, N3,190 K18, N3,877)
  • Very strong support
  • Procrastinators tend to show an intention-action
    gap, indicating an impulsive shift in motivation
  • They tend to choose short-term benefits over
    long-term gains, reflecting a core component of
    poor self-regulation

19
Need for Achievement
  • Theory
  • Those high in achievement motivation set more
    difficult goals for themselves, find work to be
    intrinsically engaging and thus necessarily less
    aversive.
  • Results (K38, N6,136)
  • Strong support
  • Large (approximately .50) correlations

20
Task Aversiveness Trait State
  • Theory
  • We seek to avoid aversive stimuli, and
    consequently, the more aversive the situation,
    the more likely we are to avoid it (e.g.,
    procrastinate).
  • Results (K10, N1,069 K8, N938)
  • Very strong support for both state and trait
    types
  • Aversive tasks tend to be procrastinated. People
    who find tasks aversive, tend to be
    procrastinators
  • Researched with a variety of methodologies
  • Especially susceptible for boring or frustrating
    jobs

21
Task Delay
  • Theory
  • The further away an event is temporally, the less
    impact it has upon our decisions
  • Results (not correlational)
  • Very strong support from a variety of fields
    (e.g., economics, behaviorism)
  • Students indicate that they would be less likely
    to procrastinate as a deadline approaches

22
Theory of Procrastination
  • Big findings
  • Impulsiveness, Self-Discipline, Task delay
  • Indicates time a factor
  • Energy, Need for Achievement, Task Aversiveness
  • Indicates value/valence a factor
  • Self-Efficacy, Self-Confidence
  • Indicates expectancy a factor

23
Theory of Procrastination
  • Any one of these variables can exacerbate
    procrastination
  • This includes having an alternative course of
    action nearby that is evaluated more favorable

24
(No Transcript)
25
Treatment
  • Need for a diagnostic procedure.
  • There are many possible causes of procrastination
    and then many different supporting factors
  • It may be expectancy, impulsiveness, task
    aversiveness, or some combination
  • For any specific factor, we need to learn why
  • For example, if task aversiveness is driving the
    procrastination for one individual, we still need
    to learn why he or she finds it unpleasant
  • For some, though not many, it will be because
    they are rebellious or have specific irrational
    beliefs

26
General Treatment Goals
  1. Reduce the aversiveness of the task
  2. Increase competence with the task
  3. Improve self-regulatory skills (e.g.,
    organization, planning) to decrease impulsiveness
  4. Distance temptations

27
Treatments
  • Techniques that likely will be broadly successful
    are
  • Energy Regulation
  • Goal Setting
  • Specific, Proximal, Challenging
  • Stimulus Control
  • Routine Building

28
(No Transcript)
29
Final Thought Procrastination Rising
  • We have been formally measuring procrastination
    since 1978
  • It has been significantly rising over the last 25
    years, as has debt, obesity and other impulse
    related issues
  • The need for effective treatments has never been
    greater than now
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com