Title: Biometrics and The Privacy Paradox
1Biometrics and The Privacy Paradox
- Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D.
- Information Privacy Commissioner/Ontario
- Privacy Identity
- The Promise Perils of the Technological Age
- DePaul University, Chicago
- October 14, 2004
2Privacy What are the Issues?
- Expanded surveillance
- Diminished oversight
- Absence of knowledge/consent
- Loss of control
3Privacy Defined
- Informational Privacy Data Protection
- Personal control over the collection, use and
disclosure of any recorded information about an
identifiable individual - An organisations responsibility for data
protection and safeguarding personal information
in its custody or control
4OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and
Transborder Flows of Personal Data
- Collection Limitation Principle
- Data Quality Principle
- Purpose Specification Principle
- Use Limitation Principle
- Security Safeguards Principle
- Openness Principle
- Individual Participation Principle
- Accountability Principle
5Growth of Biometrics
- U.S. Border Security Enhancement Act
- International Civil Aviation Organization
approved facial recognition for travel documents - EU to implement biometrics in passports and visas
- CANPASS and INSPASS programs
- AAMVA Unique Identifier Working Group
6The Myth of Accuracy
- The problem with large databases containing
thousands (or millions) of biometric templates - False positives
- False negatives
7Biometric Applications
- Identification
- one-to-many comparison
- Authentication
- one-to-one comparison
8Biometric Identification False Positive
Challenge
- Even if you have a 1 in 10,000 error rate per
fingerprint, then a person being scanned against
a million-record data set will be flagged as
positive 100 times. And thats every person. A
system like that would be useless because
everyone would be a false positive. -
- Bruce Schneier, quoted in Ann Cavoukians
Submission to the Standing - Committee on Citizenship and Immigration,
November 4, 2003 - http//www.ipc.on.ca/docs/110403ac-e.pdf
9Biometric Identification
- False Negative Challenge
- Attackers could fool the system
- Pay-offs high for compromising the system
- Increased vulnerability to a target once a
terrorist succeeds in obtaining a false negative
threat escalates considerably
10Biometric Strength Authentication
- The strength of one-to-one matches
- Authentication/verification does not require the
central storage of templates - Biometrics can be stored locally, not centrally
on a smart card, passport, travel document, etc.
11Designing Privacy Into Biometrics
- The Privacy Challenges
- Central template databases
- Unacceptable error rates
- Unrelated secondary uses
12Facial Recognition the Dream
- Khalid Al-Midhar came to the attention of
federal law enforcement about a year ago. As the
Saudi Arabian strolled into a meeting with some
of Osama bin Ladens lieutenants at a hotel in
Kuala Lumpur in December 1999, he was videotaped
by a Malaysian surveillance team. The tape was
turned over to U.S. intelligence officials and,
after several months, Al-Midhars name was put on
the Immigration and Naturalization Services
watch list of potential terrorists. The
videotape of Al-Midhar also could have been
helpful. Using biometric profiling, it would have
been possible to make a precise digital map of
his face. This data could have been hooked up to
airport surveillance cameras. When the cameras
captured Al-Midhar, an alarm would have sounded,
allowing cops to take him into custody. - - Business Week, Sept. 13, 2001, p. 39
13Facial Recognition the Reality
- Test results in place show less than stellar
results - - Logan Airport pilot had a 50 error rate in
real world conditions - - U.S. State Department has stated that facial
recognition has unacceptably high error rates - - U of Ottawa tests this summer resulted in
accuracy rates between 75 to more than 90 - - National Institute for Standards and
Technology, under ideal lighting and controlled
environment conditions reported 90 accuracy - - Superbowl facial recognition no longer
considered useful by subsequent Superbowl
organizers -
- Biometrics Benched for Super Bowl
- By Randy Dotinga, Wired Magazine
14Comparison of Accuracy Rates
- NIST Studies show for single biometrics
- Facial recognition
- - 71.5 true accept _at_ 0.01 false accept rate
- - 90.3 true accept _at_ 1.0 false accept rate
- Fingerprint
- - 99.4 true accept _at_ 0.01 false accept rate
- - 99.9 true accept _at_ 1.0 false accept rate
15Facial Recognition and Privacy Research
- Confounding Facial Recognition systems
- Creating visual noise through
- - Disguises, obstructions, light sources, face
paint - Objective
- - Creating a framework for facial recognition
countermeasures - Results
- - Research by James Alexander, U. Pennsylvania
16Biometrics Can BePrivacy-Enhancing, if they
- Have privacy hard-wired into the deployed
technology - Authenticate personal credentials without
necessarily revealing identity - Do not facilitate surveillance or tracking of an
individuals activities avoid the use of
template-based central databases - Put control of the biometric in the hands of the
individual - Provide excellent security without compromising
privacy
17Final Thoughts on Biometrics
- Current off-the-shelf biometrics permit the
secondary uses of personal information - The Goal Technology that allows for
informational self-determination and makes good
security a by-product of protecting ones
privacy - Using the biometric to encrypt a PIN or a
standard encryption key will meet that goal
Biometric Encryption - Dr. George Tomko
18I am not a number, I am a free man
I am not a number, I am a human being. I will
not be filed, stamped, indexed or numbered. My
life is my own. The Prisoner TV series, 1968
19How to Contact Us
Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D. Information Privacy
Commissioner of Ontario 80 Bloor Street West,
Suite 1700 Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S
2V1 Phone (416) 326-3333 Web
www.ipc.on.ca E-mail commissioner_at_ipc.on.ca