TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURE: ROLE AND CONTRIBUTION OF MULTIDETECTOR CT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURE: ROLE AND CONTRIBUTION OF MULTIDETECTOR CT

Description:

tibial plateau fracture: role and contribution of multidetector ct saidane, a. daghfous, a. ben othmen, s. felah, l. rezgui marhoul – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:662
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: LSDG8
Learn more at: http://strtn.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURE: ROLE AND CONTRIBUTION OF MULTIDETECTOR CT


1
TIBIAL PLATEAU FRACTURE ROLE AND CONTRIBUTION OF
MULTIDETECTOR CT
  • SAIDANE, A. DAGHFOUS, A. BEN OTHMEN,
    S. FELAH, L. REZGUI MARHOUL
  • Radiology service Trauma center, 1007 Tunis,
    Tunisia

MK11
2
INTRODUCTION
  • Tibial plateau fracture occurs mainly in a young
    population
  • Its consecutive to direct trauma of the knee,
    generally secondary to traffic accident.
  • Only explored by the past by plain radiographs,
    it benefits nowadays of an increasing number of
    CT exploration.
  • Our aim is to clarify the role of multidetector
    scanner in its pretherapeutic assessment.

3
MATERIAL METHODS
  • Retrospective study of 23 patients with fracture
    of the tibial plateau.
  • All were explored by plain radiographs of the
    knee and 16 bars CT.
  • The volume of acquisition ranged from 1 cm
    above the
  • patella to 1 cm below the tibial
    tuberosity.
  • No injection of contrast in the all cases.

4
MATERIAL METHODS
  • Bone and soft tissue filters.
  • Reconstruction in the coronal and sagittal plans
  • 3D reconstruction using GE Volume Rendring (VR)
  • Ten patients were operated
  • 13 were followed in externe consultation.

5
RESULTS
  • Average age 35 years
  • Sex ratio (M/W) 5
  • Trauma circumstances traffic accident (n9),
    domestic accident (n6) and accident at work
    (n5)
  • The tibial plateau fractures were classified
    according to Duparc et Ficat method

6
RESULTS
  • We found
  • 9 fractures of the lateral tibial plateau
  • 5 spino-condylar fractures
  • 4 medial tibial fractures
  • 5 bituberosity fractures
  • More than a third of patients has associated
    injuries primarily affecting the fibula
  • 1 case was involved in a polytraumatism           
                      

7
RESULTS
(B)
(A)
Coronal (A) et sagittal (B) reconstructions
Fracture of the lateral plateau with an
enfoncement measured at 3.7 mm ( ) and an
associated fracture of the lateral femoral
condyle ( )
8
RESULTS
3D reconstructions showing the enfoncement (
) and the fracture of the femoral condyle ( )
9
RESULTS
(A)
(C)
(B)
Coronal (A), sagittal (B) and 3D (C)
reconstructionscomminutive medial spino-condylar
fracture
10
RESULTS
(B)
Axial (B) and coronal (C) reconstructions Commin
utive fracture of the medial plateau with
enfoncement.
(A)
(A) Coronal reconstruction Fracture of the
medial plateau Separation measured at 5mm
(C)
11
RESULTS
Comminutive form of bituberosity fractures
12
RESULTS
13
RESULTS
Y form of bituberosity fracture
T form of bituberosity fracture
V form of bituberosity fracture
14
DISCUSSION
  • Tibial plateau fractures are secondary to direct
    trauma on the knee, the more often of a high
    velocity
  • Minor trauma may cause similar lesions in case of
    osteoporosis
  • Functionnal impotence, pain and knee swelling are
    the main clinical findings     
  • 2 classifications are used in both plain
    radiographs and CT
  •            

15
DISCUSSION
  • The first one, used in France and countries
    following the french school, was edicted by
    Duparc and Ficat in 1960 3,4 and distinguish
  • Fractures affecting only one plateau (60),
    generally the lateral one, consequently to a
    direct trauma in valgus (for the lateral plateau)
    or varus (for the medial)
  • Squamous tuberosity fracture (10)
  • Bituberosity fracture (30) in V, Y or T. There
    are also complex and comminutive forms
  •            

16
DISCUSSION
  • The second classification, anounced by Schatzker
    1, divides tibial plateau fractures into 6
    types
  • Lateral tibial plateau fracture without
    depression (I)
  • Lateral tibial plateau fracture with depression
    (II)
  • Compression fracture of the lateral (IIIA) or
    central (IIIB) tibial plateau
  • Medial tibial plateau fracture (IV)
  • Bicondylar tibial plateau fracture (V)
  • Tibial plateau fracture with diaphyseal
    discontinuity (VI)
  •            

17
DISCUSSION
Classification of Schatzker 2
18
DISCUSSION
  • Conflicting data exists regarding the benefit of
    a pretherapeutic CT scan in these
    classifications.
  • Stroet et al2, Chan et al5. et many others
    did show there were no increase in agreement
    between different observers for classification of
    tibial plateau fractures with the addition of a
    CT scan comparing to radiographies performed
    solely.
  • A possible explanation is that CT provides an
    overdose of information, which makes
    classification more difficult.

19
DISCUSSION
  • However, practically, CT has many advantages
  • Easier classification of fractures, especially
    between Schatzker I and II 2
  • Modification of surgical plans based on plain
    radiographic findings after CT in 6 to 60 of
    cases by more precisely demonstrating the
    fracture depression and displacement which are
    the most important factors affecting surgical
    management of standard tibial plateau fractures
    (NB 4 mm depression and 2 mm displacement ?
    surgical levels) 1,4

20
DISCUSSION
  • Diagnosis of associated soft-tissue injuries 1
  • According to Gardner et al 6, only 1 of
    patients with tibial plateau fractures has
    complete absence of soft-tissue injuries and 77
    have cruciate or collateral ligaments lesions
    that may be suspected in CT
  • Moreover, popliteal vessels lesions
    (associated with Schatzker IV) are well
    illustrated by angiographic reconstruction after
    injection of contrast.

21
CONCLUSION
  • Several studies are questioning the superiority
    of CT in the classification of tibial plateau
    fractures
  • However, the scanner offers real practical
    advantages in the choice of treatment modalities
  • Besides, the fact that classification
    methods predate the era of the scanner should
    promote new methods more
  •  more adapted to the scanner

22
REFERENCES
  • B. Keegan Markhardt, Jonathan M. Gross, Johnny U.
    V. Monu, Schatzker Classification of Tibial
    Plateau Fractures Use of CT and MR Imaging
    Improves Assessment. RadioGraphics 2009
    29585597
  • 2) M. Stroet, M. Holla, J. Biert, A. van
    Kampen. The value of a CT scan compared to plain
    radiographs for the classification and
    treatment plan in tibial plateau fractures. Emerg
    Radiol 2011 18279283
  • D. Blin, C. Cyteval, C. Kamba, M. Blondel, FM.
    Lopez.Imagerie des traumatismes du genou. J
    Radiol 2007 88 775-88
  • C. Dubois, JN. Ravey, C. Bittighoffer, M.
    Garelli, T. Delchambre, B. Rubens Duval, N.
    Mercier, L. Pittet Barbier. TDM et traumatisme
    des membres inférieurs. JFR 2010
  • Chan PSH, Klimkiewicz JJ, Luchetti WT et al
    (1997) Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and
    fracture classification of tibial plateau
    fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11(7)484489
  • Gardner MJ, Geller D, Suk M, et al. The
    incidence of soft tissue injury in operative
    tibial plateau fractures a magnetic resonance
    imaging analysis of 103 patients. J Orthop Trauma
    200519(2)7984
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com