A Comparison of the Effects of Foods of Various Glycemic Index on Academic Performance of Students 13 and 14 Years of Age - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A Comparison of the Effects of Foods of Various Glycemic Index on Academic Performance of Students 13 and 14 Years of Age

Description:

Significance Optimal glycemic index level for School Breakfast Programs Optimal glycemic index level for improved academic performance Hypothesis Low glycemic index ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:329
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: Clareloui6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Comparison of the Effects of Foods of Various Glycemic Index on Academic Performance of Students 13 and 14 Years of Age


1
A Comparison of the Effects of Foods of Various
Glycemic Index on Academic Performance of
Students 13 and 14 Years of Age
  • University of Texas at El Paso

2
Literature Review
  • Government involvement in child nutrition
    programs since 1946, National School Lunch
    Program
  • (Kennedy Cooney, 2001)
  • Recently, introduction of No Child Left Behind,
    encouraged interest in enhancing academic
    performance

3
Literature Review
  • Diet has been found to correlate to the academic
    success of student
  • (Galal Huylett, 2003)
  • Improved academic performance with proper
    nutrition
  • (Glewwe, Jacoby, King, 2001)

4
Literature Review
  • Benton Parker (1998) concluded that breakfast
    consumption positively influences tasks requiring
    memory
  • -This is as a result of an increase in blood
    glucose
  • Correlation found between a low glycemic meal and
    better cognitive processes in the morning
    (Benton, Ruffin, Lassel, Nabb, Messaoudi, Vinoy,
    Desor, Lang, 2003)

5
Major Definitions
  • Glycemic index
  • The rate at which carbohydrates are processed
    resulting in changes of blood glucose levels
    (Goscienski, 2003).
  • Low glycemic index foods avoid the sudden
    increase in blood glucose levels (Goscienski,
    2003).
  • A high glycemic food has a rating of 70 or more
  • A low glycemic index food has a rating of 55 or
    less (www.glycemicindex.com, 2004).

6
Purpose Statement
  • The purpose of this study is to compare the
    effects of foods, differing in glycemic index, on
    the academic performance of grade 7 and grade 8
    students in El Paso County, a school district
    that is mainly Hispanic.

7
Research Questions
  • Does eating compared to fasting result in higher
    academic performance?
  • Can a low or high glycemic food improve academic
    performance?
  • Do foods of varying glycemic index result in
    differing academic performances?

8
Significance
  • Optimal glycemic index level for School Breakfast
    Programs
  • Optimal glycemic index level for improved
    academic performance

9
Hypothesis
  • Low glycemic index foods consumption results in
    higher TAKS math exam scores

10
Major Variables
  • Independent variable is foods of varying glycemic
    index levels
  • Dependant variable is the resulting scores on the
    released versions of the TAKS math exams
  • Control variable is the baseline score on the
    released version of the TAKS math exam score

11
Subjects
  • 90 summer school students
  • Grade 7 Grade 8 (12-15 years of age)
  • Ysleta Independent School District, Alicia R
    Chacon Intermediate School
  • Equal amount of both genders from all ethnicities
  • Excluding diabetics, children with allergies,
    restricted diets

12
Instruments
  • High Glycemic Index
  • Cheerios (GI74 1 cup)
  • white bread (GI73 1 slice)
  • honey for the bread (GI72)
  • cranberry juice cocktail (GI68 ½ cup)
  • Low Glycemic Index
  • All Bran cereal (GI38 1 cup)
  • course wheat kernel bread (GI52 1 slice)
  • orange marmalade for the bread (GI48)
  • unsweetened apple Juice (GI40 ½ cup)

13
Procedure
  • 1st Tuesday normal breakfast routine
  • 800 am arrival
  • One hour following consumption complete a
    released version of TAKS math exam
  • Next 3 Tuesdays 3 groups
  • Fasting
  • High glycemic index food
  • Low glycemic index food

14
Limitations
  • Ages of the participants
  • Academic performance in math
  • Type of food
  • Students attending summer school

15
Delimitations
  • Participants who are late, absent, or withdraw
  • Time of year set for the study during-July
  • Vacation

16
Proposed Communication Method Data Analysis
  • Journal of nutrition for publication
  • Statistical Instrument - SPSS version 11.0
  • Statistical Procedure
  • Descriptives of Math Scores will calculated
  • One way ANOVA with values of plt0.5 or greater
    confidence

17
Time Schedule
  • December 1, 2004 IRB submissions
  • University of Texas at El Paso
  • Ysleta School District
  • February 1, 2005 to June 15, 2005
  • Participant screening
  • July 5, 2005 to July 26
  • Testing

18
Ethical Considerations
  • Consent Forms
  • Parent/Guardian signatures
  • Subject number coding
  • Kept in locked cabinet in Office
  • Pre-participation Questionnaire
  • Age, Grade, Math GPA
  • Allergies, Medical Conditions, Medications
  • Breakfast Routine

19
References
  • Scientifically Based
  • Ball, S.D., Keller, K.R., Moyer-Mileur, L.J.,
    Ding, Y., Donaldson, D., Jackson, W.D.
  • (2003). Prolongation of satiety after low versus
    moderately high glycemic index
  • meals in obese adolescents. Pediatrics, 111(3),
    488-495.
  • Benton, D., Parker, P.Y. (1998). Breakfast,
    blood glucose, and cognition. American
  • Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 67, 772-778.
  • Benton, D., Ruffin, M., Lassel, T., Nabb, S.,
    Messaoudi, M., Vinoy, S., Desor, D.,
  • Lang, V. (2003). The delivery rate of dietary
    carbohydrates affects cognitive performance in
    both rats and humans. Psychpharmacology, 166,
    86-90.
  • Donohoe, R.T., Benton D. (1999). Cognitive
    functioning is susceptible to the level of
  • blood glucose. Psychopharmacology, 145, 378-385.
  • Glewwe, P., Jacoby, H. G., King, E. M. (2001).
    Early childhood nutrition and academic
    achievement a longitudinal analysis. Journal of
    Public Economics, 81,
  • 345-368.
  • Green, M.W., Elliman, N.A., Rogers, P.J.
    (1997). The effects of food deprivation and
  • incentive motivation on blood glucose levels and
    cognitive function. Psychopharmacology, 134,
    88-94.
  • Johnson-Down, L., OLoughlin, J., Koski, K.G.,
    Gray-Donald, K. (1997). High
  • prevalence of obesity in low income and
    multiethnic schoolchildren a diet and physical
    activity assessment. Journal of Nutrition, 127,
    2310-2315.
  • Kennedy, E., Cooney, E. (2001). Development of
    the child nutrition programs in the
  • united states. Journal of Nutrition, 131,
    431-436.
  • Kleinman, R. E., Hall, S., Green, H.,
    Korzec-Ramirez, D., Patton, K., Pagano, M. E.,

20
References
  • Sunram-Lea, S.I., Foster, J.K., Durlach, P.,
    Perez, C. (2000). Glucose facilitation of
  • cognitive performance in healthy young adults
    examination of the influence of fast-duration,
    time of day and pre-consumption plasma glucose
    levels. Psychpharmacology, 157, 46-54.
  • Warren, J. M., Henry, J. K., Simonite, V.
    (2003). Low glycemic index breakfast and
  • reduced food intake in preadolescent children.
    Pediatrics, 112, 414-420.
  • Worobey, J., Worobey, H. S. (1999). The impact
    of a two-year school breakfast
  • program for preschool-aged children on their
    nutrient intake and pre-academic
  • performance. Child Study Journal, 29, 113-131.
  • Non-Scientifically Based
  • Galal, O., Hulett, J. (2003). The relationship
    between nutrition and childrens
  • educational performance a focus on the United
    Arab Emirates. British Nutrition
  • Foundation Nutrition Bulletin, 28, 11-20.
  • Goscienski, P. (2003). The Low-down on glycemic
    index. The Saturday Evening Post,
  • 40-41.
  • Natale, Jo Anna. (2000). Free for all. Teacher
    Magazine, 12(3), 7-9.
  • Stordy, J. (2002). Fatty acids for learning
    problems Could learning disabilities in
  • children be related to their diet? Dr Jackie
    Stordy examines a possible link. (pp.
  • 65). Haymarket Business Publications Ltd.
  • Ysleta Independent School District Compensatory
    Education Department. (2003).
  • Summer Program 03, Planning Manual.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com