Title: Will a Wealthier India be a Healthier India?
1Will a Wealthier India be a Healthier India?
- Jishnu Das, Shanta Devarajan, Jeff Hammer, Lant
Pritchett
2India has been growing rapidly since the 1980s
3And increases in income have translated into
4Higher life-expectancy (population sized circles,
India is big blue, China big red
5Lower child-mortality
6And lower fertility
7And yet
8There are three good reasons to worry
9Reason 1 Improving health outcomes further may
require substantially higher investments in
public health services
10where our performance is not stellar (not even
lunar)
Source WDI Indicators Database
11Reason 2 Morbidity is taking a toll on Indias
productive capabilities
12Reason 3 and the poorest 20 are not doing that
well at all (worse than BGD)
13But we have known this for 60 years
- If it were possible to evaluate the loss, which
this country annually suffers through the
avoidable waste of valuable human material and
the lowering of human efficiency through
malnutrition and preventable morbidity, we feel
that the results would be so startling that the
whole country would be aroused and would not rest
until a radical change has been brought about. - Bhore Committee Report 1946
14A Roadmap
- Three things you should know about the Indian
health system (and are fairly well known by now) - Four more things you should know about the Indian
health system (and are fairly new) - What doesnt work (but is often done)
- What might work
15The Indian health system according to The
Mindset (at least on record)
The system is Pyramidal
Basic Care is universally given by the state
- Most people use public facilities
- The private sector is just quackery and
crookery
- Sub center for every 5,000 people
- PHC for every 30,000 people etc. etc.
- Integrated referral chain
16Mindset (at least on record)
Poor people rely on the public system the
benefits of public care mostly accrue to them
17In Reality(and this is well known)
18Fact 1 Most spending is private the fraction
on genuine public goods is tiny
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
2375 Boxes on Private Care!
24In factIndia is one of the most private systems
of health care in the world
25And its becoming even more private
- The public share of institutional deliveries (of
babies) fell from 57.3 to 48.2 between 1992 and
1998 (NFHS I, II) - The public share of all deliveries fell between
1998 and 2001 (RCH I, II) as the private
sectors share rose from 9.4 to 21.5 - Recall Pay commission raises of 1997 makes this
unlikely to be due to lack of money health
ministries are very labor intensive
26Fact 2 The poor use private care as much as the
rich
27Fact 2 The poor use the private system as much
as the richeven of hospitals there is
substantial private use
28Fact 3 More public money on health goes to the
rich than the poor (because hospital use is
regressive)
29One Reason that is often given to explain why the
poor have worse health outcomes
30But this perceived wisdom is wrong
31Recent data show that
- Households in Rajasthan visit doctors more than
in the U.S. - And the differences between rich and poor in
visits to health providers is small - In Delhi, the poor go to doctors more than the
rich - Click here to see a table looking at doctor
visits from Delhi
32Despite the frequent use of health care providers
- There is no relationship between the presence of
health facilities and health outcomes -
33One important questionWhy dont the poor use
public health facilities more?
344 Reasons based on 4 lesser known facts
35Reason 1 Public Doctors in India are among the
most absent in the world
Absenteeism among health workers
36Reason 1 (cont) Absences are never below 30
percent!
37Reason 2 When public doctors do show up for
work, the exert very little effort
What they do
What they know
Effort deficit
38What does very little effort mean? 2, 1, 0
39Fact 3 And public doctors in PHCs are not
particularly competent to begin with
40Reason 4 And you still have to bribe public
doctors to do their work
41A summary of why poor people may not be using the
PHC system
- The doctors are low on competence
- They dont show up for work
- When they do show up, they dont work to the
level of their knowledge - And patients have to pay bribes anyway
42The visible hand Example 1
- Public Doctors are
- paid by salary
- not monitored by supervisors
- cannot be fired or have pay reduced under
virtually any circumstances - have higher social status and have much greater
political power than your clients complaints
dont touch you - have lucrative alternative work in the private
sector - What would you do?
-
43One oft-advocated solution
- That probably does not work
- Training Doctors
44Training and the Invisible Hand
- With public doctors, problem is NOT that they
dont know what to do, its that they dont do it! - No public doctor needs training to know that
he/she should come to work! - Yet
45Training and the invisible hand (II)
- The percentage of essential care given by a
doctor with 6 months training in the private
sector the percentage of essential care given
by a doctor with 5 years training in the public
sector
46(No Transcript)
47The losses from low effort
48Training and the invisible hand (III)
- If we train doctors in the private sector, what
guarantees that they will practice in ways
commensurate with their training?
49(No Transcript)
50Approaches to a solution
- Indias public health system bundles five
potentially separate components - Hospital-based curative care
- Ambulatory curative care
- Prevention and health promotion
- Health-sector-based public health (disease
surveillance, etc.) - Non-health-sector based public health (safe
water, sanitation)
51Each of these is subject to a different market
failure
Sub-system Market failure
Hospital-based curative care Insurance-market failure
Ambulatory curative care
Prevention and health promotion Merit goods, some externality
Health-sector based public health Pure public goods
Non-health-sector based public health Externalities
52and to a different government failure
Sub-system Government failure
Hospital-based curative care Political capture by elites
Ambulatory curative care Monitoring of effort/quality, asymmetric information
Prevention and health promotion Monitoring of effort/quality, logistics
Health-sector based public health
Non-health-sector based public health No middle-class support for reforms
53Matching the sub-system to the market and
government failure
Sub-system Institutional arrangement
Hospital-based curative care Health insurance with autonomous hospitals
Ambulatory curative care Money follows the patient
Prevention and health promotion Devolve to local governments
Health-sector based public health
Non-health-sector based public health
54The solution is the problem
- The mindset of universal, hierarchical, poor
oriented public production of health care is now
only the planners fantasy - Deer in the headlights of reform
- System reform cannot work as there is no
coherent system - Must be broken to be reset.
55Indias drugs are cheap(Example 1)
56Indias drugs are cheap(Example 2)
57Training and the Invisible Hand (IV)
- And what guarantees that they will remain in the
place they were trained? - (Invisible hand will allocate better private
doctors to richer areas)
58Doesnt matter what data or method
- NFHS I no regression effect (nothing)
- NFHS II (kucch bhi nahin)
- Reproductive and Child Health survey (kicchu na)
1998 - RCH 2001 ditto
- Torture the data as much as you like and it still
wont talk (in contrast education, income
proxies, water source, sanitation habits, pucca
roads, etc., etc. all squeal at the slightest
provocation samples are very large)
59Delhi doctor visits
Click here to return to the main presentation