Title: PCH Survey of Cultural Information Systems
1PCH Survey of Cultural Information Systems
Summary Report
- Prepared for the Canadian Cultural Observatory of
the Department of Canadian Heritage - March 2006
2(No Transcript)
3Table of Contents
Introduction 4 Background 5 Study Objectives
6 Methodology 7 Top-Line Results 9 General
Profile of Cultural Information
Systems 10 Purpose and Scope of Cultural
Information Systems 18 Funding and Marketing
Structure 26 Editorial Strategy and Technical
Structure 36
4Introduction
5Background
- The International Relations Branch and the
Canadian Cultural Observatory of the Department
of Canadian Heritage will be hosting a two-day
Cultural Information Systems Workshop. This event
will be organized in consultation with the
OEST/OAS, Mexico, Chile, the Convenio Andres
Bello, and the Caribbean Community and Common
Market (CARICOM). This workshop is also organized
with the agreement of the Government through the
Permanent Secretary responsible for Community
Development, Culture and Gender Affairs of
Trinidad and Tobago. - The workshop will take place on March 20 and 21,
2006, in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. In
order to gather information related to the design
of the workshop, PCH commissioned Decima Research
to conduct an online survey. The objective of the
survey is to identify areas that are of interest
to the participants. These areas will function as
a reference point to frame group conversations
and exchanges amongst participants at the
workshop. Analysis of the results will help
compare situations, look at similar challenges,
and share best practices.
6Study Objectives
- The research was designed to collect information
in areas such as - Organization firmographics such as number of
full-time employees, contact information, how are
they constituted, relationship with their
government, etc. - Purpose of the organization in terms of mission
statement, objectives and strategic operational
steps considered to reach these objectives - Nature of the services offered
- Sources of funding and revenue
- Target audience
- Marketing and communications practices and
priorities - Performance indicators
- Editorial strategy who prepares the content and
who contributes and who has ultimate control on
information presented - Technical structure of the organization.
7Methodology
- Survey design
- Decima provided questionnaire design consultation
based on a previous study of a similar nature.
The Canadian Cultural Observatory team
recommended appropriate changes and additions to
the survey questions. - Decima also designed an invitation text that
outlined for the participants the purpose of the
research, and how the information would be used.
This letter also recommended to participants to
involve as much staff as possible in the survey
to ensure the highest degree of information
accuracy possible. - Sampling
- The Canadian Cultural Observatory provided Decima
with contact information of 11 States
participating in the workshop. Ten of these
participants were invited via email, and one via
telephone. - Data collection
- The questions were fielded using an online data
collection methodology (CAWI Computer Assisted
Web Interviewing). - The email invitation was sent by Decima on March
2nd, 2006, and potential respondents were
contacted via telephone to be reminded of the
survey deadline.
8Methodology
- Data collection (contd).
- Data was collected from March 2nd to March 14th,
2006. A total of 9 cultural organisations
accessed and completed the survey during this
period of time. These were considered the final
sample for analysis and reporting purposes,
resulting in an overall response rate of 81.
All surveys returned were completed in English. - Verbatim reporting
- A number of free field, or open-ended questions
were included in the survey. In addition, Decima
has provided the client the raw, verbatim
comments provided by the respondents for their
own use.
9Top-Line Results
10General Profile of Cultural Information Systems
11General Information
- Results over the next six slides provide
detailed profiling information on the CIS who
participated in the study. These results can
best be summarized as follows - The majority of CIS are either governmental or
not-for-profit. Most of them indicate their
organisation has a direct relationship with the
government. - A vast majority say their CIS is engaged in
commercial partnerships, mainly in the form of
sponsoring deals. - On average, 9 full-time employees and 1 part-time
employee work for the CIS. - Half of the survey participants have an
operational CIS. All of those who are not
operating indicate they have encountered
challenges that have delayed their CIS launch.
12Geographic Distribution of CIS
Please provide the mailing address for the
organisation that manages your CIS - Country
P Antigua and Barbuda
P Barbados
P Belize
P Grenada
P Guyana
P Saint Kitts and Nevis
P Saint Lucia
P Saint Vincent and Grenadines
P Trinidad and Tobago
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
13Operational Stage of CIS
At what phase is your CIS now?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n8)
14Challenges to Launch CIS
Are there any specific challenges or obstacles
that have stopped or delayed the launch of your
CIS?
Base Respondents whose CIS is not operational
yet (n5) / Valid responses (n5)
15CIS Status and Government Relationship
What is the governance of your CIS?
Does your organisation have a direct relationship
to the government?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
16Commercial Partnerships
Is your organization engaged in partnerships with
commercial partners? These could involve the
selling of products and/or services to commercial
organisations, exchange of deals, sponsorship of
deals, etc.
What kind of partnerships are these?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
Base CIS with commercial partners (n7) / Valid
multiple responses (n13)
17Full-Time and Part Time Staff Profile
How many full time employees work for the CIS you
represent?
How many part time employees work for the CIS you
represent?
Average 9
Median 5
Mode 1
Average 1
Median 1
Mode 1
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n6)
Base All respondents (n8) / Valid responses
(n3)
18Purpose and Scope of Cultural Information Systems
19Overview of Purpose and Scope of CIS
- Results over the next six slides provide insight
into the operational stage of participating CIS,
their geographic coverage, and the type of
services and information they provide - Over half of the CIS are national cultural
portals. A few say they are specialized thematic
CIS. - Six of the nine CIS have been operating for 2
years or less. - The geographical coverage is mostly national in
scope. - English is by far the dominant language of
communication among participating CIS. A couple
of CIS are available in French and/or Spanish. - Cultural sectors are mainly heritage, folk
culture, theatre and dance. - The most common types of information offered via
the CIS include educational resources, cultural
calendars for important or local events, and
contact information of individual artists,
performers, or producers. - The most common services offered include an
events calendar, listing guides, and personal
profiles or staff contributions.
20Type and Operational Stage of CIS
How would you best describe your CIS?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
21Age of CIS
When did you launch your CIS online?
Base Respondents with portals at an operational
stage (n9) / Valid responses (n9)
22Geographical Coverage
What is the geographical coverage of the various
audiences your CIS targets?
In what languages is your CIS available?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid multiple
responses (n21)
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid multiple
responses (n9)
23Cultural Sectors Coverage
What cultural sectors does your CIS cover?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
24Types of Information Provided
What type of information does your CIS offer?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
25Types of Services Offered
What type of services does your CIS offer?
Other Registration for educational tours,
volunteering or becoming a member.
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid multiple
responses (n30)
26Fundingand Marketing Structure
27Overview of Funding and Marketing Structure
- Results over the next seven slides provide
details on funding and marketing structure and
activities - Only one respondent was able to provide an
approximate annual turnover of the CIS in 2005
(US345), specifying that 100 of it was from
other types of income (life membership). - Similarly, only one respondent was able to
provide the overall staff time dedicated to
marketing (50), while none of the survey
participants provided a percentage of their
annual budget in 2005 allocated to marketing. - The most common types of target audiences include
cultural experts, and local amateur culture
enthusiasts. - One-third of respondents say they never conduct
market research with their site users, and the
remaining two-thirds were not able to respond to
this question. - Only one respondent promotes his/her CIS online.
Partnering with other cultural sites seems very
common for this CIS, which is more likely to
undertake a variety of activities (online
banners, logo postings, shared links, etc.) with
other cultural sites rather than with
non-cultural sites.
28Overview of Funding and Marketing Structure
- (Contd.)
- The most common methods used for reaching their
target audience offline include cultural events,
print media, or TV or radio. - Cultural events are largely paid through an
exchange use of newspapers, magazines, print
flyers and posters, TV and radio is typically
paid with a combination of money and exchange. - The majority of respondents did not provide an
evaluation of their marketing results against
their expectations. Among those who rated their
marketing results vs. the expected results (3
respondents) 2 indicated their expectations were
not met because of the lack of planning and human
resources to execute them. - None of the survey participants indicated if they
use website metrics. However, some other
performance indicators are used, such as the
number of partnerships with cultural or
commercial partners, membership, public
awareness, and a membership/budget ratio.
29Target Audiences
Indicate how each type of target audience relates
to your CIS
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
30Market Research
How frequently do you carry out market research
with your site users?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
31Online Promotion
Do you promote your CIS online?
How do you promote your CIS online?
Base Respondents indicating they promote their
portal online (n1)
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
32Advertising Methods
How do you reach your target audience offline?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
33Advertising Payment
How do you pay for advertising?
Base All respondents (n9)
34Marketing Efforts Meeting Expectations
Why did your marketing activities not meet your
expectations? What were the main shortfalls?
To what extent did your marketing efforts in 2005
meet your expectations?
Base All respondents (n9)
Base Respondents whose expectations of
marketing results were not met (n2)
35Performance Indicators Used
Does your CIS use any of the following as
additional performance indicators
Base All respondents (n9)
36Editorial Strategy and Technical Structure
37Overview of Portal Editorial Strategy and
Technical Structure
- Results over the next five slides provide
insight into the editorial strategy and technical
structure of the CIS - One-third of respondents say the production of
the main bulk of their CIS content is central and
another third say it is decentral or both central
and decentral. - External contributors can upload content to their
CIS primarily through a database exchange. - Over half of respondents say they do not have
writers and only one indicates that their writers
have journalistic training. - About half of respondents indicate that their CIS
is updated every other month or less frequently,
all of them agreeing this is not sufficiently
frequent to meet their business objectives. - One respondent provides RSS newsfeeds, and 2 say
their portal harvests metadata from others
through OAI, Z39.50 or web services. The majority
of respondents were not able to provide this
information. - About half of respondents indicate that their
CISs existing technical infrastructure presents
management challenges that hinder meeting their
business objectives.
38Editorial Strategy
Who produces the main bulk of the content is it
central or decentral?
How can external contributors upload or add
content to your CIS ?
Base Respondents indicating the main bulk of
the content is decentral or both central and
decentral (n3) / Valid responses (n4)
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
39Editorial Strategy
Do your writers have journalistic training?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
40Editorial Strategy
How often is the CIS updated?
Is the frequency at which your CIS is updated
sufficient to meet your business objectives?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
41Technical Structure
Does your CIS harvest metadata from others
through OAI, Z39.50 or web services?
Do you provide RSS newsfeeds?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)
42Technical Structure
Does your CISs existing technical infrastructure
present any specific management challenges or
constraints when it comes to meeting business
objectives?
Base All respondents (n9) / Valid responses
(n9)