Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training

Description:

Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training A decision today about how much education to acquire will be reflected by future changes in earnings. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: SFredG5
Learn more at: https://ux1.eiu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Investments in Human Capital: Education and Training


1
Chapter 9
  • Investments in Human Capital Education and
    Training

2
A decision today about how much education to
acquire will be reflected by future changes in
earnings.
3
Human Capital
  • skills of an individual which he or she can rent
    out to an employer.
  • How can we analyze the decision of whether or not
    to attend college and get a degree?
  • What's important?

4
COSTS
  • Tuition and fees, foregone earnings, psychic
    costs
  • 15,000 a year minimum.

5
BENEFITS
  • Future earnings in terms.

6
Age-Earnings Profiles
College
High School
7
Direct Costs
8
Indirect costs
Direct Costs
9
Future Benefits
Indirect costs
Direct Costs
10
Human Capital Models Can Explain Why
  • earnings typically increase with age but at a
    decreasing rate.
  • unemployment rates tend to be inversely related
    to the level of skill.
  • younger workers change jobs more frequently and
    tend to receive more on the job training than
    older workers.
  • persons with greater ability receive more
    education and other kinds of training than others.

11
How can we derive a model that explains all of
these?
12
Assume
  • The increased amount of human capital affects
    only the wage rate.
  • Each person produces his own human capital by
    using his own time and goods to attend classes,
    receive on the job training, etc.

13
If the present value of net benefits is greater
than the present value of costs, the individual
will invest in human capital
14
Future Benefits
Indirect costs
Direct Costs
15
Definitions
  • Let Xt earnings with college degree in time
    period t
  • Let Yt earnings with high school degree in time
    period t
  • Let r the discount rate (interest rate)
  • Let R retirement age

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Two methods to use to determine whether or not
the investment in college is worth it or not
  • present value method - specify the discount rate
    and determine if PV(BENEFITS) gt PV(COSTS)
  • internal rate of return method - How large of a
    discount rate is necessary to make college
    profitable?

19
Present Value Method
20
PREDICTIONS
  • what happens when X, Y, C, r and R change?

21
As r rises, the present value of the difference
falls
  • Present oriented people are less likely to go to
    college than future oriented (forward looking)
    people.
  • Being present oriented implies that the discount
    rate is high.
  • Present oriented individuals discount the future
    more heavily.

22
College attendance will increase if costs fall.
23
College attendance will increase if the gap
between earnings of college and high school
graduates increases.
  • Likewise, people with a higher opportunity cost
    of foregone earnings may be less likely to attend
    college, other things equal.

24
College
High School
25
College
High School
26
What happens during a recession?
  • unemployment is less likely for educated workers
  • this implies that Y does not change
  • high school workers are more likely to be
    unemployed
  • this implies that X may become 0
  • thus, (Y-X) increases during recession years

27
Our model predicts an increase in investment in
human capital during a recession.
28
Is education a good investment?
  • Some studies estimate the rate of return to
    education after adjusting for inflation is 5 to
    15 percent
  • This is similar to the return on other
    investments

29
These estimates have biases some of which
overstate the return on education and some which
underestimate the return on education.
30
Overestimating the return on education
  • we cannot separate ability from schooling level
  • this is called a selection bias problem
  • if those who are most able are the ones who go to
    school we could be seeing increased earnings from
    higher ability and not from increased schooling

31
Underestimating the return on education
  • we cannot measure all returns from education such
    as psychic benefits
  • fringe benefits are often not included, but
    generally are higher with higher earnings

32
Education As A Social Investment
  • U.S. spends 7 of GDP on education (if we include
    foregone earnings for college education this is
    10 of GDP)
  • education has social payoffs in some fields
    (i.e., engineers)
  • but education may act as more as a sorting device
    in the labor market

33
The education of workers may make some workers
more productive and employers can then use
education as a screen.
34
Signaling
  • Firms often observe certain indicators that they
    believe are correlated with productivity
  • examples include age, race, sex. experience,
    education, etc.

35
An individual has little control over some
signals (age, race) but some can be changed
  • One of the best examples of a signal which can be
    changed is education
  • This signal can help firms discern which workers
    have higher productivity

36
Even if education does not add to productivity,
it can act as a signal which distinguishes
workers by productivity.
  • How?

37
What type of individual is most likely to get
education?
  • someone for whom the costs are low

38
What type of individual is likely to face low
costs of attending school?
  • someone who learns easily

39
Thus, individuals who learn easily are more
likely to attend college than those who dont.
  • Education level then works well as a signal to
    employers of which workers are most easily
    trained.

40
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com