Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and

Description:

$24,886 $8,832 $8,000 $69,000 Construct Measure Author Scale & Reliability Family $32,976 $12,826 $6,000 $83,4000 Husbands Traditionality – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: jillw45
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and


1
Husbands' Traditionality and Wives' Marital and
Personal Well-being in Mexican American
Families Yuliana Rodriguez, Jill K. Walls,
Heather M. Helms, Monsy Bonilla The University
of North Carolina at Greensboro
Sample Characteristics (N 125 Couples)
Abstract
Sample
Variables M SD Range
Age
Wives 27.66 5.81 16 47
Husbands 29.91 6.04 18 48
First born 5.66 3.93 .08 13.64
Years in US
Wives 8.74 4.44 0 22
Husbands 11.20 5.26 2 27
Nuclear family size 4.02 .93 3 7
Total household size 4.79 1.38 3 10
Marital duration (years) 6.66 3.99 1 15
Education (years)
Wives 9.72 3.14 0 16
Husbands 9.06 3.17 1 18
Work hours (per week)
Wives 38.24 6.30 16 60
Husbands 43.55 8.37 20 80
Income (annual)
Wives 15,028 6,564 2,500 31,600
Husbands 24,886 8,832 8,000 69,000
Family 32,976 12,826 6,000 83,4000
  • Marital Status 69.6 married, 30.4 cohabiting
    (but living as married)
  • Child Gender 58.4 male, 41.6 female
  • Firstborns Generational Status 7.2 1st
    generation, 90.4 2nd generation, 2.4 3rd
    generation
  • Ethnicity
  • Wives 96 Mexican, 1.6 Puerto Rican, 2.4 other
    Latin origin
  • Husbands 93.6 Mexican, .8 Puerto Rican, 5.6
    other Latin origin
  • Parents Birth Place
  • Wives 93.6 Mexico, 4 US, 2.4 other Latin
    country
  • Husbands 91.2 Mexico, 3.2 US, 5.6 other Latin
    country
  • Employment Status
  • Husbands 98.4 employed, 1.6 non-employed
  • Wives 52 employed, 48 non-employed
  • Acculturation Status
  • In this investigation, we examined the link
    between husbands traditionality and their wives
    marital and personal well-being in 125 Mexican
    American couples with young children. During 2- 3
    hour home interviews with couples recruited via
    cultural insiders and snowball sampling methods,
    husbands and wives described themselves and their
    marriages, the extent to which they ascribed to
    gendered views about marriage and parenting, and
    their familiarity with and acceptance of various
    dimensions of Anglo and Latino culture. Analyses
    were conducted to 1) examine the link between
    husbands traditionality and wives reports of
    marital quality and personal well-being, and 2)
    examine whether or not this link varied based on
    wives level of acculturation. Post-hoc analyses
    addressed how more vs. less acculturated wives
    differed on a number of background
    characteristics.
  • Is husbands traditionality related to wives
    marital quality and personal well-being?
  • 2) Does the association between husbands
    traditionality and wives marital quality and
    individual well-being vary as a function of
    wives acculturation status?
  • 3) How do more acculturated wives differ from
    less acculturated wives?

Research Questions
Measures
Construct Measure Author Scale Reliability
Husbands Traditionality Gender Roles Attitude Scale Marital roles childrearing subscales 10 items Hoffman Kloska, 1995 5 point scale, higher scores indicate more traditional attitudes a .84 husbands
Wives Acculturation Status Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans- II Anglo orientation 13 items Mexican orientation 17 items Groups for analyses Less acculturated Mexican More acculturated Mexican/bicultural slightly Anglo Cuellar, Arnold, Maldonado, 1995 5 point scale, higher scores indicate more Mexican orientation (i.e., less acculturated) Anglo orientation a .87 Mexican orientation a .81
Wives Marital Quality Marital Love and Conflict Love subscale 9 items Conflict subscale 5 items Braiker Kelley, 1979 9 point scale, higher scores indicate greater levels of love and conflict Love a .86 Conflict a .59
Wives Personal Well-being Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) 12 items (shortened version) Radloff, 1977 4 point scale, higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms, a .79
Results Conclusions
Correlations Between Husbands Traditionality and
Wives Marital and Personal Well-Being
Wives Acculturation Group Comparisons
Variables Less Acculturated (N 105) More Acculturated (N 20)
Age 28.55 23.00
Education 9.35 11.63
Childs generational status 1.92 2.08
Family size 4.10 3.60
Years in US 8.13 11.90
Marital duration 7.14 4.06
Bivariate Correlations Entire Sample (N 125) Less Acculturated Wivesa (n 105) More Acculturated Wivesa (n 20)
HUSBANDS TRADITIONALITY Wives Marital Love Wives Depression Wives Marital Conflict -.22 .16t -.01 -.18t .12 -.12 -.42t .39t .41t
Note a Less Acculturated Mexican status More
Acculturated bicultural slightly Anglo. p
lt .10. p lt .05.
Note All comparisons are significant at the p lt
.05 level
  • Overall, the more traditional husbands are, the
    less love wives report in their marital
    relationships. However, the consideration of
    wives acculturation status further qualifies
    this finding and suggests that the negative
    association between husbands traditionality and
    wives love is more pronounced for more vs. less
    acculturated wives.
  • A positive association exists between husbands
    traditionality and wives depression and conflict
    for more acculturated wives only suggesting that
    the more traditional their husbands are, the more
    depression and marital conflict these wives
    report.
  • A mismatch between husbands traditionality and
    wives acculturation status has negative
    implications for wives personal well-being and
    marital quality.

Acknowledgements This research was funded by a
UNCG Regular Faculty Grant, the HES Grant
Incentive Program, and an Agricultural Research
Service Award (P.I. Dr. Heather Helms). Many
thanks to participating couples, project manager
Mary Julia Moore, and Darlene Pitaluga, Ashley
Valezquez, and Diana Escobar for their assistance
with data collection. Correspondance concerning
this poster should be directed to Monsy Bonilla
at mybonill_at_uncg.edu.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com