Lecture 7: Behavioral Finance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 7: Behavioral Finance

Description:

Yale University Other titles: Times New Roman Default Design Lecture 7: Behavioral Finance Questionnaire, Part I Give 90% Confidence Interval Questionnaire, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:309
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: rober158
Learn more at: http://www.econ.yale.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 7: Behavioral Finance


1
Lecture 7 Behavioral Finance
  • The Role of Psychology

2
Questionnaire, Part IGive 90 Confidence
Interval
  1. How much does the Statue of Liberty weigh, in
    tons? (entire steel-reinforced copper figure)
  2. What is the 2000 population of Turkey?
  3. How many square miles in Sahara Desert?
  4. Endowment of Yale University as reported in
    1998-9 Support of Education Survey?
  5. How much, in dollars, does one receive if one
    wins the Pulitzer Prize (2001)?

3
Questionnaire, Part IIGive 90 Confidence
Interval
  • 6. US Population in first census (1790)
  • 7. US Traffic fatalities New Years Day 1/1/98
  • 8. Connecticut land area, square miles
  • 9. Height of Mount Everest
  • 10. 100-meter dash winner, time in seconds, 1896
    Olympics

4
Overconfidence
  • From my October, 1987 Investor Survey
  • Did you think at any point on October 19, 1987
    that you had a pretty good idea when the market
    would rebound?
  • Institutional 29 yes, Individual 28 yes
  • Among buyers 47, 48
  • If yes, what made you think you knew when a
    rebound would occur?
  • Answers intuition, gut feeling, common
    sense

5
Prospect Theory
  • Kahneman and Tversky, Econometrica 1979
  • Two elements, value function and weighting
    function
  • Elements replace utility function and
    probabilities in expected utility theory

6
(No Transcript)
7
Samuelsons Lunch Colleague
  • Paul Samuelson offered two-to-one odds to his
    colleague colleague wins 200 if heads, loses
    100 if tails. Colleague refused bet.
  • Samuelson asked him if he would take 100 such
    bets. Colleague said yes.
  • Samuelson proved mathematically that his
    colleague was not rational (from expected utility
    theory). Scientia 98108-13, 1963

8
(No Transcript)
9
Allais Paradox
  • Which do you prefer 25 chance of winning 3000
    and a 20 chance of winning 4000? 35,65
  • Which do you prefer 100 chance of winning 3000
    or an 80 chance of winning 4000? 80,20

10
Regret Theory
  • Prospect of regret pain generates avoidance
    behavior
  • People avoid selling stocks that have gone down
    in value, rush to sell those that have gone up
    (disposition effect).

11
Cognitive Dissonance
  • Mental conflict that occurs when one learns ones
    beliefs are wrong, avoidance behavior
  • Ads for recently purchased cars
  • Disposition effect

12
Wishful Thinking Bias
  • People exaggerate probability that their team
    will win.
  • People exaggerate probability that the candidate
    they favor will win.

13
Attention Anomalies
  • Attention is fundamental aspect of human
    intelligence and its limits
  • Social basis for attention
  • Inability to account for ones attention
  • No arbitrage assumption of financial theory No
    ten-dollar bills lying around. Does not require
    everyone is paying attention.

14
Anchoring
  • Kahneman Tversky wheel of fortune experiment
  • Subjects unaware of their own anchoring behavior
  • Examples stock prices anchored to past values,
    or to other stock prices in same country.

15
Mental Compartments
  • Shefrin Thaler Compartments current wage,
    asset, and future.
  • Shefrin Statman Investors have a safe part
    of their portfolio that they will not risk, and a
    risky part of their portfolio that they can
    have fun with

16
Representativeness Heuristic
  • People judge by similarity to familiar types,
    without regard to base rate probabilities
    (sensitive, artistic woman, sculptress or bank
    teller)
  • Tendency to see patterns in what is really random
    walk

17
Disjunction Effect
  • Inability to make a decision that is contingent
    on future information
  • Shafir Tversky People who took one of
    Samuelsons lunch colleague bet were asked if
    they would take another. Most took the second bet
    whether or not they won the first. But most would
    not take second bet before outcome of first was
    known.
  • Reaction of stock market to news

18
Gambling Behavior
  • 61 of US adults gambled in 1974.
  • 1.1 of men and 0.5 of women are compulsive
    gamblers
  • Gamblers Anonymous
  • Gambling associated with self esteem and
    competence
  • Generates an aroused state that chases away cares

19
Magical Thinking
  • B. F. Skinner 1948, fed hungry pigeons
    mechanically at 15-second intervals. Pigeons
    developed superstitions
  • Stock market responses to events may have similar
    origins

20
Quasi-Magical Thinking
  • Newcombs Paradox (named after William Newcomb of
    Livermore Labs by Robert Nozick, 1969,
    reformulated by Shafir Tversky) Subject plays
    a game with a computer, and is told that the
    consumer can predict from his behavior what he
    will do. Two boxes appear on computer screen.
    Subject is told that computer knows pretty well
    whether subject will choose box A or both box A
    and B. Computer puts 1000 in box A, and
    1000,000 in box B if it thinks subject will
    choose box B alone, otherwise puts nothing in box
    B.

21
Quasi Magical Thinking II
  • Langer People bet more on coin not yet tossed.
  • People pay more for lottery ticket in which they
    choose the number

22
Culture and Social Contagion
  • Social cognition, collective memory
  • Durkheim, 1897, suicide rates differ across
    countries for no more reason than different
    cultural themes
  • A global culture in todays world
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com