Monitoring an endangered plant species at Wilson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Monitoring an endangered plant species at Wilson

Description:

270.31 0.00 109.89 25734.29 2.00 132.87 18889.63 2.00 8.00 66.00 25.00 Grand total (9m2) 22.00 Grand total (9m2) 8510.00 0.00 Grand total (9m2) Grand total (9m2) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: PlantEc7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Monitoring an endangered plant species at Wilson


1
Monitoring an endangered plant species at
Wilsons Creek National BattlefieldThe
importance of spatial data
  • John R. Boetsch
  • Brian Witcher
  • Lisa Thomas

2
Missouri bladderpodLesquerella filiformis Rollins
photo NPS archive
3
(No Transcript)
4
Missouri bladderpod
  • listed Federally Endangered in 1987
  • narrow endemic - 62 populations in 5 counties of
    sw Missouri and nw Arkansas
  • threatened by habitat alteration development
  • winter annual
  • germinates in fall, flowers following spring
  • population size fluctuates from year to year

5
Local concerns
  • five populations at WICR
  • encroaching woody vegetation
  • exotic species establishment
  • largest population at a site of great historical
    significance
  • how to manage for species and interpretive value
    simultaneously?

6
Monitoring objectives
  • How does abundance fluctuate over time?
  • Which factors are driving abundance changes?
  • How is limestone glade habitat changing?

7
(No Transcript)
8
Annual abundance estimates
9
Missouri bladderpod abundance
10
Grid-based survey
  • sampling grid covers large portion of glade
  • visit every 5 x 5 meter grid cell
  • estimate number of individuals in each cell
  • simultaneous collection of habitat data for each
    grid cell
  • collection at 1-m scale in core habitat

11
Grid-based survey
1997
1998
Missouri bladderpod
12
Grid-based survey
1997
1998
Annual brome grass
13
Grid-based survey - 1998
Annual brome
Hop clover
Missouri bladderpod
14
Grid-based survey - 1998
Decid. tree shrub
Eastern red cedar
Missouri bladderpod
15
Grid-based survey - 1998
Pebbles gravel
Native forbs
Missouri bladderpod
16
Grid-based survey - analysis
17
Grid-based survey - analysis
Annual brome grass
Hop clover
18
Grid-based survey - analysis
Spearmans rank correlations
19
1-meter data for Bloody Hill glade
20
1-meter data for 1998
.576
Pebbles and gravel
Missouri bladderpod
-.375
Deciduous trees shrubs
21
Scale of observation influences correlations
22
Scale of observation influences correlations
23
Spatial autocorrelation of abundance
24
Habitat is variable at small scales
photo K. Mlekush
25
Extensive versus intensive monitoring?
  • fine-scale data important for detecting
    meaningful patterns
  • habitat management across broad area
  • must balance sample grain and extent

26
Utility of correlations
Competitive displacement?
27
Advantages of spatial census
  • snapshot of spatial abundance patterns
  • identify core areas, map monitor habitat change
  • detect expansion in extent
  • spatial correlation analyses
  • stratification of small-scale monitoring

28
Demographic monitoring
photo K. Mlekush
29
Demographic monitoring
photo K. Mlekush
30
Understanding Missouri bladderpod life cycle
viability
Seed bank
germination
reproduction
Mature plants
Germinated seedlings
survival growth
31
Most transition rates depend on microhabitat
viability
Seed bank
germination
reproduction
Microhabitat
Mature plants
Germinated seedlings
survival growth
32
Unfinished business
  • develop analytical methods in a monitoring
    context
  • improved synthesis and reporting
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com