New Nuclear at Darlington Environmental Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

New Nuclear at Darlington Environmental Assessment

Description:

... Enhanced site security Additional lands for construction lay down Storage for excavated rock and soil Potential wildlife near ... in Cumulative Effects ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: opgCompow
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Nuclear at Darlington Environmental Assessment


1
New Nuclear at Darlington Environmental
Assessment
WELCOME TO Ontario Power Generations New
Nuclear at Darlington Community Information
Session Environmental Assessment Fall 2008
2
Contents
Contents
1
  • Tonights presentation will cover
  • The Project
  • Roles, Responsibilities, Milestones
  • Environmental Assessment
  • Project Assumptions Layouts
  • Project Environment Interactions
  • Environmental Assessment (continued)
  • Cumulative Effects
  • Significance Criteria
  • Feedback
  • What We Are Hearing
  • Input on Our Current Work

3
Describe the ProjectPhases
The Project - Roles and Responsibilities
2
  • The Project
  • To construct and operate a new nuclear power
    plant at the existing Darlington site to meet the
    base-load electricity requirements of Ontario
  • Ontario Power Generation (OPG)
  • Is responsible for the federal approvals - an
    environmental assessment (EA) site preparation
    licence
  • The EA and licence application are for
  • Up to four nuclear units
  • Up to 4,800 MW of electrical capacity
  • The EA must be completed before the site
    preparation licence can be issued
  • A federally appointed joint review panel will
    review the EA and licence application

OPG will be the operator for the new nuclear
units at the Darlington site
4
Describe the ProjectPhases
The Project - Roles and Responsibilities
3
  • Infrastructure Ontario
  • Leading a competitive process to select a nuclear
    reactor vendor to construct two units and
    potentially additional units
  • Three internationally recognized vendors
    participating
  • Areva NP - US Evolutionary Pressurized Reactor
    (1600 MW)
  • Atomic Energy of Canada Limited ACR1000
    Advanced CANDU Reactor (1200 MW)
  • Westinghouse Electric Company AP1000 nuclear
    power plant (1000 MW)
  • End of 2008 Deadline for Phase 2 Submission
  • 2009 Preferred Vendor Selected
  • The Vendor will
  • Be responsible for construction, including
    hiring, purchasing, etc.
  • Turn the reactors over to OPG when they are ready
    to begin operations

5
Upcoming Community Information Sessions
The Project Roles and Responsibilities
4
  • OPG asked to begin federal approvals process for
    new nuclear
  • Initial Site Preparation Licence submitted
    Sept. 2006
  • Project Description submitted April 2007
  • Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency/Canadian
    Nuclear Safety Commission
  • Determined that a Joint Review Panel will be
    established to review the documents
  • Released for public review on September 4, 2008
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
    Guidelines
  • Draft Panel Agreement and Terms of Reference
  • Comments due November 19, 2008
  • OPG
  • Submits EIS and Site Preparation Licence
    Application, once guidelines are finalized
  • Joint Review Panel
  • Undertakes Public/Technical Review Holds Public
    Hearing
  • Issues Report to Federal Minister of the
    Environment

6
Darlington New Build Project Description
Major/Indicative Milestones
5
7
Elements in the Environmental Assessment
  • OPG has completed baseline data collection for
    most of the areas of study
  • ?
  • We are currently looking at project environment
    interactions
  • ?
  • All of this will be documented in the
    environmental assessment

6
8
The Project Principle Buildings Structures
9
The Project - Conceptual Plant Layouts
  • Conceptual layouts developed to provide for
    principle buildings and structures
  • All provide for
  • Site access
  • Switchyard Expansion
  • Parking, Construction Facilities
  • Soil Stockpiles, Lake fill, Land fill
  • Used Fuel Nuclear Waste Storage
  • Layout 1 Four reactors and once through lake
    water cooling

10
Conceptual Site Layouts
  • Layout 2 has mechanical draft cooling towers and
    two reactor units
  • Mechanical draft cooling towers
  • Main heat transfer to atmosphere
  • Structure minimally visible off-site
  • Very large land area required
  • ?
  • ?
  • Layout 3 has natural draft cooling towers and two
    reactor units
  • Natural draft cooling towers
  • Main heat transfer to atmosphere
  • Structure highly visible off-site
  • Large land area required

11
Lake Fill
  • Potential Lake Fill
  • Lake Ontario shoreline along Darlington property
  • From intake channel to Easterly limit of
    Darlington site
  • EA Bounding Assumptions
  • Approximately 100 metres into the lake on west
    side
  • Approximately 450 metres on east side
  • Approximately three million cubic metres,
    covering 40 hectares
  • Provides
  • Enhanced site security
  • Additional lands for construction lay down
  • Storage for excavated rock and soil
  • Potential wildlife near shore habitat post
    construction

12
Project DescriptionBounding EA
Timelines/Temporal Boundaries
The dates shown are for EA study purposes.
Actual start and in service dates have yet to be
determined
13
Site Preparation
  • Timeline
  • Approximately two years
  • Workforce
  • Up to 400 (100 on-site 300 off-site)
  • Activities Include
  • Mobilization
  • Vegetation Removal/Earthmoving
  • Soil/Rock Management
  • up to 12 million cubic metres
  • Infrastructure installation

14
Construction
  • Workforce
  • Up to 3,500 peak workforce for two units
  • On-site parking
  • Off-site parking may be used within five km of
    Darlington site, bus shuttles to transport
    workers
  • Activities Include
  • Installation
  • Reactor block, turbine generator, cooling system
  • Construction Waste Management
  • Marine/Road/Rail Considerations
  • Concrete Supply
  • Timeline
  • Approximately six to eight years for two units

15
Operations
  • Workforce Procurement
  • Up to 1,400 per year for each set of two units
  • Mid-Life Replacement or Refurbishment - peak
    workforce approximately 2,000
  • Procurement patterns similar to current
    Darlington
  • Activities Include
  • Reactor Commissioning
  • Safe plant operations
  • Waste/Used Fuel transfer
  • Mid-life major component replacement and/or
    refurbishment
  • Timeline
  • Approximately 60 operating years for each set of
    reactors (2016-2100)

16
Project Environment Interactions Matrix
Component Potential Interaction Potential Interaction Potential Interaction Potential Interaction
Component Site Preparation Construction Operation Decom- missioning
Aboriginal Interests
Aquatic Biota, Surface Water
Atmosphere
Geology, Hydrogeology, Seismicity
Human Health
Hydrology Surface Water
Land Use and Transportation
Physical Cultural Heritage
Radiation and Radioactivity
Socio-economic Conditions
Terrestrial
17
Potential Environment Effects Atmospheric
Environment
  • Atmospheric Environment
  • Air quality noise
  • Examples of Potential Effects
  • During site preparation construction phases
  • Off-site dust and vehicle exhaust emission
  • Increased noise from traffic and equipment
  • Dust and noise levels return to low levels during
    plant operation
  • Localized fogging and icing from mechanical draft
    cooling towers (if used)

18
Potential Mitigation Measures Atmospheric
Environment
  • Potential Mitigation Measures
  • Dust management plan for site preparation and
    construction phases, assumed to include
  • Watering for dust control
  • Paved versus unpaved roads
  • Different aggregate grades for road construction
  • Slope stabilization (e.g. hydro seeding)
  • Noise
  • Ensure construction equipment is well maintained
  • Proactive communication with community
  • Vehicle operating restrictions
  • Off-site dust / vehicle exhaust/ noise effects
  • Routine monitoring and notification

19
Potential Environmental Effects Socio-Economic
Conditions
  • Socio-economic environment
  • Community character, economic studies,
    recreational users, municipal finance, etcetera
  • Examples of Potential Effects
  • Nuisance effects to adjacent neighbours
  • Disruption of some on-site recreational
    facilities
  • Increased demand for municipal services and
    housing
  • Creation of direct, indirect and induced
    employment opportunities
  • Increased municipal revenue

20
Potential Mitigation Measures Socio-Economic
Conditions
  • Potential Mitigation Measures
  • Monitor neighbouring properties for nuisance
    effects
  • Replace or offset loss of recreational uses on
    and off the Darlington site
  • Support construction and trades recruitment and
    training initiatives
  • Enhanced apprenticeship programs

21
Projects to Consider in Cumulative Effects
Projects to Consider in Cumulative Effects
Cumulative Effects Assessment
20
22
Cumulative Effects Assessment
  • Projects
  • 407 East Extension
  • Region of Durham Energy from Waste Facility
  • Development within Clarington Energy Park
  • Oshawa Ethanol plant
  • St. Marys Alternative Fuels Project
  • Pickering Airport
  • Refurbishment of existing Darlington Nuclear
    Generating Station
  • Future 401 widening
  • Studies and Plans
  • Durham Region Water and Wastewater Master
    Servicing Strategy

23
Significance of Residual Environmental Effects
  • Criteria typically include
  • Magnitude of effect
  • Geographical extent of the effect
  • Timing, duration, and frequency of the effect
  • Degree to which effects are reversible or
  • mitigable
  • Ecological and social/cultural context
  • Probability of occurrence
  • Existing regulatory and industry standards are
    used as points of reference.
  • Professional expertise and judgment are also
    applied.

24
Feedback Weve Received
  • Community Information Sessions
  • 600 visitors to date
  • Most Important Environmental Features are
  • Drinking and lake water quality
  • Atmospheric environment, air quality
  • Human health considerations
  • Nuclear emergency infrastructure and preparedness
  • Transportation system safety and road traffic
    volumes safety


25
Feedback Weve Received
  • Community Kiosk
  • 500 visitors
  • Benefits the project will bring to the area
  • How to secure employment
  • Importance/Value of the Kiosk
  • Timing of Key Events
  • When will construction, operations start?
  • When will decisions be made?

  • Community Events/Displays
  • 5,000 visitors
  • 50 of the comments
  • Nature of the EA studies, Strong project support
  • 50 beyond OPGs responsibility
  • Vendor selection, Ontarios electricity system,
    etcetera

26
Upcoming Community Information Sessions
Thank you for participating!
25
  • Were here to answer your questions.
  • We want your input on
  • Mitigation measures to address potential effects
    of the project
  • Project to consider for the cumulative effects
    assessment
  • Criteria to assess significance of effects
  • Comment and evaluation forms are available
    please take a minute to fill them out before you
    leave!

27
Contact Us
Contact Us
26
www.opg.com/newbuild 1-866-487-6006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com