Building and Protecting Your Reputation Capital - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Building and Protecting Your Reputation Capital

Description:

... (Canadian Tire, Tim Hortons, MLF, SDM) Canadian owned and publicly traded Beta = 0.783 Difference with Market Beta = -0.217 Rate of Return (1 year) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:166
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: DylanB2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Building and Protecting Your Reputation Capital


1
Building and Protecting Your Reputation Capital
BC TRANSIT 2012 WORKSHOP
  • Dr. Terence (Terry) Flynn, APR, FCPRS
  • April 3, 2012

2
Todays Game Plan
  • What is Corporate Reputation
  • Group Exercise
  • CR as your ICA
  • Conditions and Attributes
  • Safeguarding your Reputation

3
At Your Table
  • Five things that are important to you when you
    think about an organizations CR
  • Three (3) organizations that have a good
    reputation
  • Three (3) organizations that have a bad reputation

4
Some of The Drivers/Attributes of Reputation Are
5
What Philosophers Think
  • The way to gain a good reputation is to endeavor
    to be what you desire to appear.
  • Socrates
  • It is easier to cope with a bad conscience than
    with a bad reputation.
  • Nietzsche

6
What Business Leaders Think
  • You cant build a reputation on what you are
    going to do.
  • Henry Ford
  • If you lose dollars for the firm, I will be
    understanding. If you lose reputation for the
    firm, I will be ruthless.
  • Warren Buffett

7
A Conceptualization of Reputation
  • Identity
  • The internal traits of the firm that are critical
    to its distinctiveness and longevity
  • Image
  • The perceptions and associations that are
    constructed by the purchaser of the
    product/service
  • Brand
  • The constructed visualization of the companys
    value proposition
  • Reputation
  • The holistic viewpoint in which an organization
    is internalized by its stakeholders

8
Putting Reputation Into Perspective
  • A concept held in the minds or cognitions of
    stakeholders.
  • A set of attributes ascribed to a firm, inferred
    from past actions.
  • Perceptions, attitudes and/or beliefs of
    stakeholders
  • A corporate reputation is a perceptual
    representation of a companys past actions and
    future prospects that describe the firms overall
    appeal to all of its key constituents when
    compared with other leading rivals (Fombrun,
    1996).

9
Creating the Business Case for Reputation
Management
10
The Competitive Context of the 21st Century
  • An intensely competitive, global marketplace
  • 24/7 media and internet environments
  • The drive for Inimitable advantages
  • commoditization
  • Vocal consumerism/stakeholder centric
  • Increased focus on corporate governance
  • The rise of intangible assets

11
RM as ICA
  • A strategic management process should result in a
    distinct competitive advantage
  • Strategy how to gain competitive advantages
  • SMP sequential set of analyses and choices that
    can increase the likelihood that a firm will
    choose a good strategy that is, a strategy that
    generates competitive advantages

12
The Growing Importance of Intangible Assets
13
The Reputation Capital Pipeline
14
Why Reputations Matter
  • Reputation
  • A resilient asset to some companies in a
    difficult marketplace
  • Stakeholders perceptions of reality
  • Customers, employees, investors, media, financial
    analysts
  • Influence investment decisions (herd mentality),
    prospective
  • A good one acts like a magnet
  • Create differentiation and competitive advantage
  • Affect strategic positioning
  • Mirror that reflects company success

15
What Are Reputations Worth?
  • Reputation and financial value are related in
    three ways
  • Operating performance
  • Profitability affects market perceptions of
    future prospects
  • Operating activities themselves contribute to
    building reputation capital a shadow asset
  • Reputation Affects Operating Performance
  • Stimulates employee productivity
  • Creates reservoir of goodwill
  • Reputation Creates Financial Value That Builds
    Reputation
  • Receive favorable endorsements from stakeholders
    and the media
  • Fortunes most admired
  • Reputation Has Financial Value as a Corporate
    Asset
  • Branding and reputation-building help build a
    companys visibility, familiarity, and fame
    investments in creating reputational assets
  • Crisis costs include loss of reputation capital

16
Value of Corporate Reputation
  • Operational Value
  • Increasing employee satisfaction
  • Ability to recruit retain talent
  • Help customers to choose between products (when
    little functional difference exists)
  • Supports new product introductions
  • Provides a second chance during crises
  • Arguably, the internal benefits are the most
    valuable, especially for companies that rely on
    employees to support external positioning

17
Value of Corporate Reputation
  • Financial Value
  • Based on work Dowling conducted in conjunction
    with the Fortune 500 Most Admired Companies
  • Good Corporate Reputations increase the length of
    time that firms spend earning superior financial
    returns (a carry-over effect)
  • Good Corporate Reputations may reduce the length
    of time that firms spend earning below-average
    financial returns (a lead indicator effect)

18
Worth In Progress
  • 26 Companies from 2006 Leger Top 100 Reputation
    Companies (Canadian Tire, Tim Hortons, MLF, SDM)
  • Canadian owned and publicly traded
  • Beta 0.783
  • Difference with Market Beta -0.217
  • Rate of Return (1 year) 25.09
  • Total Expected Rate of Return 10.7
  • Reputational Difference 15.02
  • 5 year rate of return (annualized) 16.31
  • DOES Reputation Matteryou bet!

19
Reputation is a Differentiator of Value
  • Employees
  • Attracts and keeps talent
  • Builds pride
  • Makes jobs more attractive and motivates
    employees
  • Customers
  • Attracts new customers
  • Encourages repeat purchases
  • Builds market share
  • Opens new market opportunities
  • Investors
  • Lowers cost of capital
  • Attracts new investments
  • Media
  • Generates more positive coverage
  • Government
  • Enhances support
  • Minimizes chance of enhanced scrutiny
  • Communities
  • Builds support
  • Minimizes concerns

The key is to develop mutually beneficial
relationships with these stakeholder groups
resulting in continued supportive behavior!
20
Determinants of Reputation
  • Visibility
  • Authenticity
  • Transparency
  • Consistency
  • Distinctive
  • Effective
  • Resilent

21
Determinants of Reputation
22
Relationship Intelligence
23
Stakeholder Engagement Index
  • Identify priority stakeholders
  • Influence/power
  • Interest/involvement
  • Measuring relationship variables
  • Trust, commitment, satisfaction, transparency,
    mutuality
  • Create scorecard metric
  • Track the delta (change over time)

24
Analyze and engage stakeholders
Interest High Low Keep informed Key Player
Interest High Low Minimal efforts Keep satisfied
Interest Low High Low High
Power Power Power
25
Components of Relationship Management
  • Trust
  • Satisfaction
  • Commitment
  • Transparency (Honesty/Openness)
  • Control Mutuality
  • Exchange Relationship
  • Communal Relationship

26
Its All About Relationships
  • When thinking about the company or organization
    that you like a lot (on a 7-point scale)
    Leger/McMaster March 2010 (N1500)
  • To what extent do you trust this company (M6.0)
  • To what extent do you believe that they are
    honest/transparent (M5.8)
  • To what extent do you believe they are committed
    to meeting your expectations (M5.9)
  • To what extent are you satisfied with this
    company (M6.1)
  • To what extent do you believe that you can
    influence the decisions or direction of this
    organization (M3.8)

27
When You Dont Have A Relationship
  • To what extent do you trust this company (M1.9)
  • To what extent do you believe that they are
    honest/transparent (M2.0)
  • To what extent do you believe they are committed
    to meeting your expectations (M2.1)
  • To what extent are you satisfied with this
    company (M1.9)
  • To what extent do you believe that you can
    influence the decisions or direction of this
    organization (M1.7)

28
How Important is it that a Company
  • Builds trust with people like you (M6.1)
  • Be honest and transparent (M6.2)
  • Commits to meeting your expectations (M6.0)
  • Satisfy people like you (M6.1)
  • Allow people like you to influence their
    decisions (M5.2)

29
Your Challenge Then Is To
  1. Increase Trust
  2. Demonstrate Transparency
  3. Strengthen Commitment
  4. Enhance Satisfaction
  5. Give your publics/stakeholders a voice

30
Toyotas Accelerated Reputation Decline
31
Toyotas Climb to 1
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Awareness 66 71 80.8 80.8 83.1
Reputation Score 58 66 76 75 77
Good Opinion 62 69 78.6 77.8 80.2
Bad Opinion 4 3 2.2 3 2.9
Global Sales 2 2 1 (tied with GM) 1 1
32
A Reputation Recalled! But
Toyota (Feb 1-3) Toyota (Feb 8-13) Honda GM Ford Nissan Mazda Hyundai Kia Chrysler
Aware 83.5 80.2 79.1 79.9 83.8 62.5 64.9 61.4 48.7 75.8
GO 72.1 59.1 74.1 47.7 57 54.6 57.2 42.5 25.6 38.9
BO 11.4 21.1 5.0 32.2 26.8 7.8 7.8 18.9 23.2 36.9
RS 61 38 69.0 15.5 30.3 46.8 49.4 23.6 2.4 2.0
DKE 11.9 15.5 17.9 16.5 13.8 31.7 29.1 32.2 41.7 20.1
Aware Awareness (G0B0) GO Good Opinion BO
Bad Opinion RS Reputation Score (GO BO) DKE
Dont know this company enough to have an opinion
33
90 Days Later
Toyota (Feb 8-13) Toyota (May 1-6) Honda GM Ford Nissan Mazda Hyundai Kia Chrysler
Aware 80.2 84 82.5 78.7 83.5 67.5 68.7 63 51.6 75.6
GO 59.1 61.4 77.3 48.8 60.7 59.5 62.9 45.6 28.7 42.1
BO 21.1 22.6 5.2 29.9 22.8 8 5.8 17.4 22.9 33.5
RS 38 38.8 (.8) 72.1 (3) 18.9 (3.4) 37.9 (7.6) 51.4 (4.6) 57.2 (4.6) 28.2 (4.6) 5.9 (3.5) 8.6 (6.6)
DKE 15.5 12 14.3 17 13.5 27.5 24.5 31.3 39.6 20.2
Aware Awareness (G0B0) GO Good Opinion BO
Bad Opinion RS Reputation Score (GO BO) DKE
Dont know this company enough to have an opinion
34
But its a different relationship story
Relationship Factors Canadians (n1273) Toyota Owners (n204) Benchmark (n1506)
To what extent do you trust Toyota 4.2 5.3 6.1
To what extent do you believe Toyota is honest/transparent 4.0 4.8 6.2
To what extent do you believe Toyota is committed to meeting their customers expectations 4.6 5.5 6.0
To what extent are you satisfied with Toyotas response to the recalls 4.2 4.9 6.1
To what extent do you believe that customers can influence the decisions or direction of Toyota 4.9 3.7 5.2
35
SR OR RR MR ICA
  • Relationships
  • Your role is to develop and strengthen mutually
    beneficial relationship with your priority
    publics
  • Reputation
  • Your role is to enhance and leverage reputation
    to strengthen priority relationships
  • Risks
  • Your role is to identify, assess and mitigate
    (where possible) risks to corporate reputation
  • Results
  • Your role is to measure how your contributions
    strengthen relationships and enhance the overall
    reputation.

36
Questions/Comments?
  • Contact Information
  • Dr. Terence (Terry) Flynn, APR, FCPRS
  • Assistant Professor
  • Department of Communication Studies Multimedia
  • McMaster University
  • Hamilton, ON L8S 4M2
  • (905) 525-9140 ext. 26977
  • Email tflynn_at_mcmaster.ca
  • Twitter terryflynn
  • Blog terryflynn.ca
  • Linkedin
  • www.mcm.mcmaster.ca
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com