J. Ludwig - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

J. Ludwig

Description:

Title Comparision of safety aspects: oil versus gas pipelines J rg Ludwig Den Haag, March 2006 Structure Preliminary remarks Hazard, safety, risk Risk management ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: RainerR2
Learn more at: https://unece.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: J. Ludwig


1
Title
  • Comparision of safety aspects
  • oil versus gas pipelines

Jörg Ludwig Den Haag, March 2006
2
Structure
  • Preliminary remarks
  • Hazard, safety, risk
  • Risk management
  • Measures to avoid hazards basic design
  • Summary and recommendations

3
  • The risks from crude oil pipelines are primarily
    those relating to environmental pollution.
  • Risks from product pipelines affect both public
    safety and the environment.
  • Risk from flammable and toxic volatile liquids
    pipelines as well as gas and liquefied gas
    pipelines primarily concern public safety and
    risk prevention.

4
Safety and hazard as complementary terms
5
  1. There is no such thing as absolute safety in the
    sense of zero risk (even the renunciation of
    non-controllable risks bears the risk of lost
    benefits).
  2. Different technical products, processes, plants
    and events should preferably not represent
    different risk levels for the objects protected
    by law and regulation (risk equivalence).
  3. The scale for the largest and acceptable risk is
    not governed solely by the level of protection
    that the object to be protected needs rather, it
    is derived from the process of weighing up
    between the opportunities (chances) and the risks
    that are linked to the introduction of
    technical/scientific developments (risk
    adequacy).

6
  • Risk R can be expressed by a statement of
    probability that links firstly the expected
    frequency of occurrence F (likelihood) of an
    event that leads to damage and, secondly, the
    ex-tent of the damage to be expected when the
    event takes place (L consequence).
  • In its most simple form it can be defined as
  • R C F

7
Risk-management
Scope Definitions Pipeline, System
Hazard and Failure Identifications

Initial Risk Evaluation Basic Design
Frequency Analysis
Consequence Analysis
Risk Estimation
Pipeline System Related Measures
Substance Related Measures
Risk Acceptance Tolerability Decision
Initiation, Realization Control, Review
8
  • Risk analysis attempts to answer three
    fundamental questions
  • What can go wrong (by hazard identification)?
  • How likely is this to happen (by frequency
    analysis)?
  • What are the consequences (by consequence
    analysis)?

9
Simplified scheme for the determination of
potential hazards (deductively determined
hazards)
10
Comment
  • The potential hazard of liquified pressurized gas
    is greater than the potential hazard of liquids,
    at all.
  • Environmental aspects, particular hazards (e.g.
    earthquake), increasured catastrophe potentials
    etc. have to be taken into account.
  • These hazards are not covered by existing
    regulations, in principle.

11
Modalities of transport Aspects and procedures
related to service conditions
  • system design
  • pipe design
  • design of terminal and intermediate stations
  • materials and coatings
  • corrosion management
  • construction
  • testing
  • commissioning (prior to operation/on the job)
  • operation, maintenance, shut-down, scrapping
  • supervision procedures
  • alarm planning and emergency planning
  • reports and documentation

12
Modalities of transport Non-quantifiable
additional conditions I
  • batch operation (e. g. gas/liquid)
  • particular corrosion conditions caused by the
    substances
  • under ground/above ground modes of operation
  • special construction and operation conditions
  • guarantee of access to pipeline route
  • possible working width
  • provision of auxiliary material/energy
    requirements
  • access to and storage of test water

13
Modalities of transport Non-quantifiable
additional conditions II
  • consideration of junctions and narrowing
  • difficulties due to geotechnical conditions
  • instable conditions (ground faults, fissuring)
  • soft, swampy underground
  • rocky underground
  • flood areas
  • earthquake zones
  • permafrost zones
  • landslide zones

14
Modalities of transport Non-quantifiable
additional conditions III
  • areas of cultivation and sanitary fills
  • difficulties due to hydrographic conditions
  • activities of third parties
  • land use
  • mining activities
  • additional safety aspects
  • public safety
  • environmental protection
  • protection of assets (properties)

15
Kind of quantity to be respected
  • total amount transported per unit time
  • total quantity within the pipeline (stationary)
  • quantity in each closable section
  • worst-case amount that can be released

16
Chemical properties to be respected I
  • explosive
  • inflammable
  • oxidising
  • self reacting
  • decomposing
  • polymerising
  • toxic
  • corrosive
  • environmentally polluting
  • suffocating
  • carcinogenic

17
Chemical properties to be respected II
  • These properties may affect
  • directly
  • indirectly
  • short-term
  • long-term
  • the physical integrity of human beings, and may
    damage the environment and properties

18
Environmental safety
  • Damage to the environment could relate to
  • areas of outstanding natural beauty
  • nature reserves
  • areas of archaeological importance
  • natural resources (reservoirs, usable forest,
    woods, etc.)
  • stratified water, water conservation areas
  • monuments, works of art, cultural possessions

19
Effects related to liquids and gases
  • Liquids
  • Flammable immediate ignition followed by a pool
    fire or evaporation and delayed ignition of a
    vapour cloud, resulting in a flash fire and/or
    explosion
  • Toxic evaporation from pool, formation and
    dispersion of toxic cloud
  • Dangerous to the environment entry into the soil
  • Gases
  • Flammable immediate ignition followed by a
    flare or delayed ignition of the gas cloud,
    resulting in a flash fire and/or explosion
  • Toxic formation and dispersion of toxic cloud
  • Dangerous to the environment nothing available
  • Liquefied pressurised gases
  • Flammable immediate ignition followed by a flare
    or a BLEVE / fireball or delayed ignition of
    the vapour cloud, resulting in a flash
    fireand/or explosion
  • Toxic partial rain-out, and formation and
    dispersion of toxic cloud
  • Dangerous to the environment dispersion in the
    atmosphere, affecting fauna

20
Failure modes and duration
  • The failure modes for different kinds of
    pipelines are significantly different , too.
  • Additional aspects to consider in this respect,
    besides the properties of the inventories of
    pipelines are
  • heavy gas behaviour (cooling down effects)
  • third party interference
  • corrosion behaviour (internal and external)
  • aging (fatigue)

21
Summary I
  • Basic safety can be related to regulations, in
    principle.
  • Additional safety aspects have to be considered
    in relation to different inventories and their
    characteristics and properties.
  • Therefore, initial hazard and failure
    investigation is of fundamental importance for
    the risk management process, regardless if the
    process is of a deterministic or probabilistic
    kind.

22
Morphological box - the Safety Cube

23
  • Pipeline design relates initially to the
    pressure-carrying components such as
  • piping, pipes
  • containers, vessels
  • apparatuses, auxiliary facilities
  • pumps
  • fittings, valves, slide valves (shut-off valves)

24
  • The application of modern standards, sets of
    rules and pressure-vessel codes can provide
  • a conservative limitation of permissible
    stresses
  • avoidance of stress peaks with the help of
    optimised designs
  • favourable material properties
  • largely optimised manufacturing, construction
    and testing technology
  • knowledge of possible damage and its assessment
    (liability)
  • consideration of corrosive effects
  • elevated impact protection
  • leak before break behaviour

25
  • This can lead to improvements with respect to
  • material coefficients and/or safety coefficients
  • increase in safety coefficients generally
  • materials-related increase in safety coefficients
  • more in-depth consideration of corrosion
  • increase in level of welding, manufacturing and
    testing procedures
  • application of similar safety levels for pipes
    and equipment components.

26
  • Transport conditions can be improved by means of
    the application of a two-barrier-priciple
  • underground pipe laying
  • increased earth coverage
  • laying of cover plates
  • provision of double-walled pipes

27
Summary II
  • Measures for reducing the consequences cannot be
    taken, easily.
  • Methods for reducing the consequence are, e.g.
  • limiting the quantity of substances that could be
    released by subdividing the pipeline into
    sections in connection with
  • leak monitoring measures and
  • remote control for shut-off valves,
  • relocation positions of pumping stations etc.,
  • changing the routing of the pipeline.

28
  • By creating, raising and optimising measures for
  • maintenance procedures
  • monitoring and supervision procedures
  • alarm and emergency planning
  • it is also possible to actively or passively
    counteract undesirable events.

29
Conclusion
  • Regulations, standards, pressure vessel codes
    etc. deal with service conditions and are
    applicable unrestricted for liquid pipelines,
    only. In all cases where additional hazards have
    to be mentioned substance related or pipeline
    system related additional requirements have to
    be elaborated respectively met. Hazards and
    failures have to be identified and measures to
    cover these have to be developed as complete and
    systematically as possible because omissions are
    hardly to be recognised later on.

30
Recommendation
  • Because of the importance of the differences of
    characteristics and properties of the pipeline
    inventories in connection with the key role of
    the first steps of each risk preventive strategy
    some recommendations on these items should be
    added to the UN/ECE Draft Safety Guidelines/Good
    Practices for Pipelines.

31
Impressum
BAMDivision III.2 Unter den Eichen 87 D-12205
Berlin Dr.-Ing. Jörg Ludwig Phone 49 (0)
30/8104-1320 Fax 49 (0) 30/8104-1327 E-Mail
joerg.ludwig_at_bam.de
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com