Title: Government Price Control Policies and Economic Efficiency
1Government Price Control Policies and Economic
Efficiency
2What we will learn in this class
- Why does the government need price control
policies? - Two price control policies price ceiling and
price floor. - Impacts of government price control policies on
market outcomes. - Lessons that we can learn from government price
policies.
3Why does the government want to regulate market
prices?
- A competitive market free of government
regulations is efficient when it is at
equilibrium. - However, some suppliers or demanders may not be
satisfied with the market equilibriums. - As a result of such dissatisfaction, they may try
to lobby the government to impose price control
policies.
4What kind of price control policies the
government may adopt?
- Price ceiling (if demanders win) is a legally
determined maximum price that sellers may charge. - Price floor (if suppliers win) is a legally
determined minimum price that sellers may receive.
5Impacts of government price control policies on
market
- Price ceiling
- Example Rent control
-
- Price floor
- Example Minimum wage
-
6Price Ceiling Rent Control in New York City
- It dates back to the housing shortage following
World War II and generally applies to buildings
constructed before 1947 in New York City. - Rent control is intended to protect tenants in
privately-owned buildings from illegal rent
increases.
7Price Ceiling Rent Control The Market for
Apartments without Price Ceiling
- Equilibrium without price controls
8Price Ceiling Rent Control The Market for
Apartments with Price Ceiling that is binding
- The eqm price (800) is above the ceiling and
therefore illegal. - The ceiling is a binding constraint on the
price, and causes a shortage.
800
9Effects of A Binding Rent Control
- A binding rent control creates
- a shortage of apartments long waiting lists.
- Non-price rationing more low income families may
not be able to find an apartment to rent. - It also encourages Black Market.
10Summary market outcomes of government price
ceiling policy
- Price ceiling reduces market efficiency
(shortage). - Non-price rationing.
- In contrast, a competitive equilibrium market
without price controls is more efficient.
11Price Floor Minimum Wage
- Minimum wage in Pennsylvania has risen to 6.25
starting Jan. 1, 2007 and will continue to
increase to 7.15 on July 1, 2007. - It has been designed to protect those with low
skills, low education and teenager workers.
12Price Floor Minimum WageUnskilled labor market
without minimum wage
13Price Floor Minimum WageUnskilled labor market
with a binding minimum wage
- The equilibrium wage (6) is below the floor and
therefore illegal. - The floor is a binding constraint on the wage,
and causes a surplus (i.e., unemployment).
14Market Outcomes of A Binding Minimum Wage
- A binding minimum wage creates
- a surplus of unskilled workers. (more
unemployment). - non-price rationing employers may discriminate
certain types of job applicants. - more labor supply from teenagers people in need
may end up losing jobs.
15Summary Market outcomes of government price
floor policy
- Price floor reduces market efficiency (surplus).
- Non-price rationing.
- In contrast, the competitive equilibrium market
without price floor is more efficient.
16Lessons that we can learn from government price
control policies
- Price plays a very crucial role in our economy.
- Controlling price may reduce market efficiency
and may miss the policy intentions. - Alternative government policies.
17Tax
18Content
- Tax
- Tax on buyer side
- Tax on seller side
- Applications
19- Importance of tax
- Tax incidence distribution of tax
- When a new tax is imposed, who will pay it?
- Whats the market outcomes?
20When A New Tax Is Imposed on Buyers
21- Step one
- Tax shift demand curve?
- Step two
- How demand curve shifts?
- Step three
- Compare two equilibriums
22- Implications
- If the government levies a tax on buyers
- Taxes reduce quantity of good sold
- Buyers and sellers share the burden of taxes
- Elasticity and tax on buyers
23When A New Tax Is Imposed on Sellers
- Taxes on oil companies
- BP took in 250 billion revenue last year
24- Step one
- A tax will shift supply curve?
- Step two
- How?
- Step three
- Compare two equilibriums
25- Implications
- If the government levies a new tax on sellers
- A new tax will discourage market activities,
reducing quantity of goods sold. - Sellers and buyers share the burden of taxes
- Elasticity and tax on sellers