Proposing Research: From Mind to Paper to Action - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Proposing Research: From Mind to Paper to Action

Description:

Proposing Research: From Mind to Paper to Action 9310019A Nancy 9310025A Paula 9310029A Shelly A dissertation proposal has four substantive functions 1. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: spacesIs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Proposing Research: From Mind to Paper to Action


1
Proposing Research From Mind to Paper to Action
  • 9310019A Nancy
  • 9310025A Paula
  • 9310029A Shelly

2
  • A dissertation proposal has four substantive
    functions
  • 1. To plan
  • 2. To communicate
  • 3. To establish a contract
  • 4. To earn a doctorate

3
Research proposals as rites of passage
  • Becoming an academic is like joining a club
  • The audiences understand the proposal is very
    important
  • As the gatekeepers
  • The relationship between candidate and doctoral
    advisor

4
Commitment
  • bring about some sort of new orientation, some
    interest in new areas, some growth in the
    candidates outlook. If not, the candidate is
    looking backward instead of forward.
  • Planning function is one of the underlying
    reasons for writing a proposal

5
From thought to language
  • Get troubles because of audience
  • Preliminary ideas fleeting, predicated, unstable
  • Clear
  • Meaningful

6
What is to be done?
  • Focused free-writing
  • start on topics
  • continue for a period of
    time
  • dont stop
  • repeat the last word

7
  • Free-writing
  • Write quickly
  • Select most important ideas
  • Revise than from first draft

8
Questions to structure the proposal
  • Proposal writers need to ask themselves some
    simple questions. These can be divided into
    several groups.
  • What?
  • Why? in Context
  • How?
  • Who? When? Where?

9
  • What?
  • Begin with an interest in a particular area.
  • Research has autobiographical roots.

10
  1. identify the source of their interest
  2. Minimize the distortion
  3. Identify the connection with the subject of the
    interview

11
  • Why? in Context
  • Why the subject is important to others
  • 1. meaningful or not
  • 2. beneficial or not
  • John Rowan suggested
  • researchers consider how their own personal
    interests are served by their research and who
    elses interest is served.

12
  • How?
  • How can researchers adapt the structure of
    in-depth interviewing to their subject study?
  • Interview one When did you get teacher feedback
    at the first time?
  • Interview two What should teachers notice when
    they give students teacher feedback?
  • Interview three Do you like teacher feedback?
    Why or why not?

13
  • Who? When? Where?
  • Who are the participants in this research?
  • Qualitative research emergent
  • Doesnt begin with a set of hypotheses to
    test, its not necessary to strict control of
    variables.

14
  • Overemphasizing the emergent nature of research
    design in qualitative research.
  • --looseness, lack of focus, and misplaced
    nonchalance about purpose, method, and procedure

15
Rationale
  • Some are still dominated by experimentalism or
    other forms of quantitative research
  • Should
  • 1. grapple firsthand with the issues
  • 2. inform a significant body

16
Working with the material
  • describe how researchers intend to work with,
    analyze, describe, and share the material they
    gather.
  • Its difficult for them to make a project if they
    never done before.
  • Theory
  • 1. an issue to analyze and interpret the
    material they gather
  • 2. discern and forge relationships
  • 3. emanate

17
Piloting your work
  • Pilot to guide along strange paths or through
    dangerous places
  • 1. alert elements of their own interview
    techniques
  • 2. detract from those objectives
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com