From Colliding Atoms to Colliding Galaxies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

From Colliding Atoms to Colliding Galaxies

Description:

From Colliding Atoms to Colliding Galaxies The Complex Dynamics of Interacting Systems T. P. Devereaux Students: C. M. Palmer, M. Gallamore & G. McCormack – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: ThomasDe2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Colliding Atoms to Colliding Galaxies


1
From Colliding Atoms to Colliding Galaxies The
Complex Dynamics of Interacting Systems
  • T. P. Devereaux
  • Students C. M. Palmer, M. Gallamore G.
    McCormack

2
Many-Body Physics at Many Length Scales
1026 - 1015 m
102 10-4 m
Universe evolve? Galaxy formation? Cosmic
strings?
Phases of matter? Neural networks?
10-4 10-8 m
1015 - 108 m
Cell dynamics? Protein folding? Magnetic vortices
in superconductors?
Black holes? Star formation? Are orbits stable?
108 - 102 m
10-8 10-16 m
Global warming? Predict weather? Population
biology?
Electron transport? Ultra-cold atoms? Forces
inside the nucleus?
3
The Many-Body Problem
  • What cannot be explained in terms of
    non-interacting particles
  • Collective behavior of many particles (galaxies,
    proteins, metals, etc.).
  • Phase transitions (e.g. solid-liquid,
    ferromagnet-paramagnet).
  • Structures and conformations (crystals, polymers,
    biopolymers, etc.).
  • Instabilities of particles or fields (1D
    Luttinger liquid, black holes, cosmic strings).

Solving for a particles path
  • Start out with 1 particle
  • Fma or
  • -ih??/?t H ?
  • - determines particles path.
  • Add another particle
  • add V(r1-r2)
  • - path of particle 1 depends on path of
    particle 2.
  • Add one more particle
  • NOT EXACTLY SOLVABLE! (except in special cases)

PROBLEM How can we approach real systems?
4
What is Computational Physics?Computation v.
Experiment v. Theory in Physics
  • The goal of computational physics is not to
    replace theory or experiment, but to enhance our
    understanding of physical processes.
  • Create experiments.
  • Visualize physics in action.
  • Multi-disciplinary.
  • Cost effective research.
  • Very accessible.

5
Different Computational Approaches
  • Enumeration (e.g. Monte Carlo).
  • Simulation (molecular dynamics).
  • Algebraic manipulations (Maple, Mathematica).
  • Solution of approximate equations (dynamical mean
    field theory).

6
Enumeration Monte Carlo methods
  • Enumerate all the states of a system and
    determine their energy.
  • Evolve towards a ground state.
  • Used widely in chemistry, materials physics, and
    biophysics
  • Example Simulated Annealing, Lattice Melting

Low Temperature
High Temperature
7
Simulation N-Body Tree Codes
  • Fma for all coupled particles (106).

Widely used in astronomy and condensed matter
Example Galaxy merger
C. Mihos, CWRU

8
Approach to Modeling Real Systems
  • Work on either exact problems or toy models.
  • Do experiments with basic fundamental ideas.
  • Determine dynamics macroscopic behavior
    reproduced?
  • Determine essential physics ingredient.

9
Lets Look at a Specific Problem
1026 - 1015 m
102 10-4 m
Universe evolve? Galaxy formation? Cosmic
strings?
Phases of matter? Neural networks?
10-4 10-8 m
1015 - 108 m
Cell dynamics? Protein folding? Magnetic vortices
in superconductors?
Are orbits stable? Star formation? Black holes?
  • How do structures order?
  • How are they affected by defects?
  • How do they respond to external forces?

What are magnetic vortices in superconductors?
Dynamics of Extended Floppy Objects
108 - 102 m
10-8 10-16 m
  • Lipids, proteins
  • DNA
  • Magnetic vortices

Predict weather? Global warming? Population
biology?
Electron transport? Ultra-cold atoms? Forces
inside the nucleus?
10
Real applications of superconductors
Mag-lev
Transmission lines
Biomedical applications
  • Further applications?
  • peta-flop supercomputer?
  • nanoscale devices?
  • quantum computation?

11
Vortices in Superconductors
  • Electrons pair to lower their energy when cooled
    to superconducting state.
  • Electrons carry current without resistance and
    expel magnetic fields.
  • Electrons swirl in magnetic field gt KE kills
    superconductivity.
  • SOLUTION Rather than kill superconductivity
    altogether, let magnetic field penetrate in
    isolated places -gt VORTICES (tubes of swirling
    electrons).

EXTENDED FLOPPY OBJECT (you can choose another if
you like)!
12
Visualization of Increasing Applied Magnetic
Field B
B
Now if an external current J is applied
More and more vortices appear as the magnetic
field increases
and the vortices begin to order into a lattice.
J
F
Lorentz force causes vortices to move -gt EMF
produced and we get resistance! NO LONGER A
SUPERCONDUCTOR!
13
Solution Create defects to pin vortices
  • Krusin-Elbaum et al (1996).

Vortices lower their energy by sitting on defects.
  • Critical current enhanced over virgin
    material.
  • Splayed defects better than straight ones.
  • Optimal splaying angle 4 degrees.

14
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Vortices
  • Vortices elastic strings under tension.
  • Vortices repel each other.
  • Temperature treated as Langevin noise.
  • Solve equations of motion for each vortex.
  • Calculate current versus applied Lorentz force,
    determine critical current.

15
Animation Pinning of Vortices
  • Different types of pinning
  • straight
  • stretched
  • collective

would be missed if vortices were treated
individually.
16
Pinning Principles (fixed field)
At low T, a few pins can stop the whole lattice.
At larger T, pieces of lattice shear away.
Columnar defects
17
Pinning principles (fixed temperature)
For small fields, pinned vortices may trap others.
But channels of vortex flow appear at larger
fields.
18
Depinning lt-gt vortex avalanches
  • STRATEGY
  • Use defects to pin, block channel flow.
  • Take advantage of repulsion.
  • So we must pin all vortices.
  • Identified main ingredient blocking channel
    flow.

19
A Wall of Defects?
A wall of defects can stop channel flow
but causes too much damage to sample.
20
Splaying (tilting) Defects
Vortices stuck on tilted defects.
But vortices have difficulty accommodating to
defects for large angles of splay.
  • Stuck vortices block interstitials.
  • Channels of flow eliminated.

21
Reproducing Experiments
  • Two-stage depinning for columnar defects
    (squares) channel flow and onset of bulk flow.
    Splayed defects (circles) eliminate channels of
    flow.
  • Used our simulations to identify main physical
    ingredient (blocking channel flow) to reproduce
    experimental behavior.

22
Ending the story
Computational many body physics is diverse and
applicable to many important problems across many
fields.
23
Summary
  • Many-body problem touches all length scales, many
    areas of physics.
  • Computational physics is a powerful and
    cost-effective tool to complement
    theory/experiment.
  • Many roads to follow
  • Use N-body tree codes to simulate galaxies and
    larger scale systems.
  • Unzipping transitions in DNA Pathways of protein
    folding -gt Raman (light) scattering.
  • Onset of avalanches.
  • Behavior as a qubit (quantum computing).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com