Food for thought - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Food for thought

Description:

Food for thought On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B Managers who complain about lack of motivation in their workers might do well to consider the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:158
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: xzh76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Food for thought


1
Food for thought
  • On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B
  • Managers who complain about lack of motivation
    in their workers might do well to consider the
    possibility that the reward systems they have
    installed are paying off for behavior other than
    what they are seekingand this is what regularly
    frustrates societal efforts to bring about honest
    politicians and civic-minded managers.
  • Steven Kerr (AME, 1995, p.13)

2
Session 3Managing Change at the Individual Level
3
Topics for Today
  • Recap
  • Theme 1 individuals as agents and recipients of
    change.
  • Case study John Smithers.
  • Discussion your own experience in a change
    process.
  • Theme 2 The role of incentives for individual
    behavior.
  • Debate Extrinsic or intrinsic motivation?
  • Summary and takeaways

4
  • 5 targets in managing change in a loosely coupled
    system
  • Sources Solution Strategy
  • Presumptions of logic Doubt produces
    change Attention management
  • Socialization processes Re-socialization
    produces Training programs
  • change
  • Differential participation Equalization
    produces Decision structure
  • rates change
  • Constant variables that Distraction
    produces Organizational slack
  • disconnect units change
  • Corruption of feedback Dependability
    produces Consultant, persistent
  • loops change expert sources

5
The Paradox of strategiesExploration versus
exploitationMarch 1991
  • Exploitation or exploration The strategic
    choice
  • Examples
  • IBM in the 1980s PC or Mainframe?
  • 3M competing through new niche or existing
    markets?
  • The trade-off between the two strategies
  • Exploitation the temptation
  • Political
  • Cultural
  • The need for strategic visionthe trade-off
  • Reinterpreting 3M and Motorola

6
Theme 1.Individuals as agents and recipients of
change
  • Changes start and end with individuals
  • As strategists
  • As implementers
  • As recipients
  • Need to understand the role of individuals in the
    change process
  • The case of John Smithers
  • Some observations
  • The Silicon Valley phenomenon
  • Sun Hydraulics
  • Six Sigma Quality Program in Citibank
  • Questions
  • What motivates individuals to behave this or that
    way?
  • What do you think John Smithers role in the
    change process?

7
Case Study John Smithers
8
Organizational chart at Sigtek
9
The Context of Change
  • The environment
  • Economic recession
  • Market competition
  • Changes in parent company (Telwork)
  • Need for change
  • Organizational structure
  • Tensions between engineering and operation
  • Organizational culture
  • Different managerial styles across departments
  • The introduction of the change program (TQM)

10
Background Total Quality Management
  • Customer focus
  • Emphasis on continuous improvement
  • Problem solving processes with extensive
    tracking, measurement
  • Empowerment
  • Create fit between the social and the technical
    system
  • Focus on crossover or hand-offs.
  • Benchmarking, comparing with norms
  • Ownership across boundaries of output

11
John Smithers
  • Describe the approach to change at Sigtek
  • What was the situation Smithers faced in this
    assignment?
  • barriers to change
  • drivers to change
  • Was Smithers effective?
  • implementation steps
  • why did things get wrong?
  • What should he have done differently?
  • What are the future prospects for this quality
    control initiative? Can TQM be revived?

12
Consider Sigteks chronology of events
  • April Smithers receives assignment paired with
    enemy Murphy
  • May-June Murphy and Smithers (S/M) get 3 week
    TQM training
  • July Senior managers attended 2 day seminar
  • August S/M meet with TQM Team Patricof denies
    one week teaching delay
  • September 25 employees trained excitement
    follow-up action frustrationaccounting
    rejects S charge back
  • October Training continues
  • November Request temporary recoup break denied
    Patricof promoted
  • December Smithers asked to be relieved

13
Change at Sigtek
  • Barriers
  • interdepartmental conflicts
  • philosophical differences with partner Murphy and
    Patricof
  • Inflated employee expectations
  • Cultural resistance to change
  • Imposed, dogmatic program
  • Distraction of business demands
  • Smithers own regular assignment
  • Drivers
  • Opportunity to build bridges and integrate
    multiple businesses
  • Pent-up needs/problems
  • Need to break old habits
  • Excited, participative manager
  • Highly acclaimed program widely known
  • Opportunity to save the business

14
Analysis from the three lenses
15
The lens of Strategic design
  • Strategic issues
  • Timing of change
  • Top-down or bottom-up
  • Incremental or quantum changes?
  • A systematic program for change?
  • Alignments between personnel, incentives,
    structures
  • Identifying problems in training program ?
    resolved at the workfloor.
  • Mismatch between the parent company and Sigtek in
    the change program.

16
The Political Lens
  • Tensions between engineering and operation groups
  • The failure of building a political coalition
  • Support from top managers?
  • Competition of interests and resources
  • Multitasking
  • Attention allocation
  • Different interests versus a common cause for
    change?
  • Managers use the six sigma quality program to
    pursue their own agenda.
  • Why didnt Patricof allow a break in the training
    process?

17
The cultural lens
  • Empowerment as the key to TQM
  • Autocratic, unresponsive to workers feedbacks
  • Ill fitted for the Six Sigma Quality Program
  • More on culture in the next session

18
Involving the whole organization for change
  • Three change constituencies
  • strategists (declare the need for change, but no
    support or direction)
  • the implementers (mandate a new way of doing
    without considering internal customers needs)
  • the recipients (meeting felt needs)
  • Sigtek problems
  • limited parent support Patricof negative talking
    the talk
  • Smithers self-righteousness and lack of EI
    alienates internal customers
  • the recipients needs are disregarded, not aired

19
Takeaways for Smithers
  • Have emotional intelligence to register
    resistance to change and coopt adversaries. Do
    not dig your own (TQM) grave.
  • Use group composition to build bridges between
    engineering-operation department.
  • Develop some small successes Take some
    measurements. Grab the power that comes with
    empowerment!
  • Build political capital manage Patricof and
    Bradley, even Telwork.

20
Take aways for Telwork
  • Signal support for TQM. Identify strategists,
    implementers and recipients
  • Provide milestones and other support
  • Empower people by giving them a sense of
    ownership
  • Create incentives for TQM team. Create customer
    awareness
  • Need to motivate change agents, need to
    understand their aspirations, goals, and needs.
  • Need a systematic change program timinglayoffs,
    cutbacks, etc.

21
Theme 2 On Motivating People
  • Management is about managing people
  • The mission of business school training
  • The cases of Silicon Valley and Morgan Stanley
  • Is incentive an indispensable managerial tool?
  • What is incentive?
  • Do people respond to incentives?
  • The folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B
  • What kinds of incentives?
  • Incentive pay or intrinsic motivation?
  • Individual-based or collective-based
  • Short-term based or long-term based?
  • Types of jobs (professional versus
    nonprofessional)

22
Debate Extrinsic or Intrinsic Motivation?
23
Extrinsic motivation
  • For
  • The bottom line economic rewards have to be
    competitive
  • Economic rewards are indicators of achievement
    and status
  • Incentive pay (to induce higher level of efforts)
  • Labor costs versus labor investment.
  • Against (Kohn)
  • Induces only temporary compliance.
  • Pay is not a motivator.
  • Rewards punish.
  • Rewards rupture relationships.
  • Rewards ignore reasons.
  • Rewards discourage risk-taking.
  • Rewards undermine interest.

24
Intrinsic Motivation
  • For
  • The Hawthorn experiment
  • Individuals enjoy work, collective activities
  • Individuals respond to peer pressures, social
    comparison
  • Socialization, professional training shape
    behaviors
  • Against (?)
  • To what extent?
  • Under what conditions?

25
  • In general, the more cognitive sophistication
    and open-ended thinking that was required, the
    worse people performed when working for a reward.
  • Aflie Kohn (2000, p. 55)

26
Summary and takeaways
  • Motivation and incentive matter.
  • Incentives take different forms
  • Financial, social recognition
  • Individual-based, collective-based
  • Short-term, long-term
  • Motivations vary with
  • Work environments
  • Different types of career lines
  • Stages in the life course
  • A key managerial task is to figure out what
    motivates your employees and design your
    incentive plan accordingly.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com