Analysis of MHD in high density ITB discharges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis of MHD in high density ITB discharges

Description:

Internal Transport Barriers and Rotational Shear P.C. de Vries JET-EFDA Culham Science Centre Abingdon OX14 3DB UK Introduction Why Internal Transport Barriers? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: deV147
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis of MHD in high density ITB discharges


1
Internal Transport Barriers and Rotational Shear
P.C. de Vries JET-EFDA Culham Science
Centre Abingdon OX14 3DB UK
2
Introduction
  • Why Internal Transport Barriers?
  • ITBs may play a role in advanced tokamak scenario
    for ITER1.
  • Studying ITBs may improve our understanding of
    transport physics
  • Scope of this presentation
  • Present experimental observations on ITBs at JET
  • Especially focussing on the role of rotation(al)
    shear
  • How do these relate to turbulence and transport
    physics?
  • Present results on other recent transport studies
    at JET
  • Provide a reference to various experimental
    papers
  • Start a discussion

3
Turbulence and Transport
  • Transport in Tokamak plasma is predominantly
    driven by turbulence.
  • Temperature gradient driven turbulence ? stiff
    profiles
  • Non-diffusive behaviour ? ?T does not change with
    Heat Flux

4
Internal Transport Barriers
  • Profile stiffness locally broken in the presence
    of and Internal transport barrier (ITB).
  • Studying ITBs may improve our understanding of
    transport physics

5
How to make an ITB
  • Empirical recipe to form strong ion internal
    transport barriers
  • Optimised q-profiles with low or negative
    magnetic shear (q/q)
  • Often significant Neutral Beam Injection (NBI)
    heating
  • Similar recipe used in various Tokamaks (JT-60U,
    DIII-D, AUG )

6
How to make an ITB
  • In plasmas with negative magnetic shear a
    specific class of ITBs are triggered when qmin
    reaches an integer value1,2,3
  • Confirmed by the onset of an Grand-Cascade of
    Alfven waves4.

1JOFFRIN, E., Nucl. Fusion 43 (2003)
1167 2AUSTIN, M.E., Phys. Plasmas, 13 (2006)
082502 3WALTZ, R.E., Phys. Plasmas 13 (2006)
052301 4SHARAPOV, S.E. Nuclear Fusion 46 (2006)
S868
7
ITBs and plasma rotation
  • How important is the NBI ingredient? ?? rotation?
  • Can we make strong ITBs without fast plasma
    rotation?
  • Experiments on ITBs at JET were carried out,
    where the plasma rotation was changed by
  • Replacing the NBI by ICRH ion heating1,2
  • Not easy to keep the heat flux unchanged
  • Applying smaller or larger toroidal field
    ripples2,3
  • Change rotation independent from heat flux

1HAWKES, N.C., et al., Contribution to the th EPS
Conference (Warsaw) 2008. 2DE VRIES, P.C., et
al., Nucl. Fusion 49 (2009) 075007. 3DE VRIES,
P.C., et al., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 50
(2008) 065008.
8
TF ripple and Plasma Rotation
  • JET has the unique capability to alter its
    toroidal field ripple.
  • This has a significant effect on the plasma
    rotation1.
  • But less on the heat deposition by NBI and ICRH

1DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Nucl. Fusion 48 (2008)
035007.
9
ITBs and plasma rotation
  • Increasing the TF ripple amplitude and reducing
    the rotational shear
  • has a detrimental effect on the growth of the
    ITB.
  • Nevertheless, an ITB triggering event is still
    visible!

2DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
Fusion 50 (2008) 065008. 3DE VRIES, P.C., et al.,
Nucl. Fusion 49 (2009) 075007.
10
ITB and Rotation
  • ITB growth is limited in plasmas with a larger TF
    ripple, i.e. a smaller rotation/less rotational
    shear

11
Rotational shear and ITBs
  • The rotational shear or shearing rate ?ExB has
    been calculated under the assumption of
    neo-classical poloidal rotation.
  • The rotational shear at the time the ITB is
    triggered varied with TF ripple

1DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Nucl. Fusion 49 (2009)
075007.
12
Rotational shear and ITG turbulence
  • At the time the transport barrier forms/triggers
  • for high TF ripple or a larger ICRH fractions
    ?ExB1-2104 s-1
  • almost one order of magnitude below the ITG
    growth rate ?ITG
  • for low TF ripple and high NBI fractions
    ?ExB6104 s-1
  • of the order of ITG growth rate ?ITG
  • Detailed modelling with the GYRO code showed that
    in the second case the ITG growth rate is
    affected but not yet fully stabilised.
  • The triggering of ion ITBs in JET are usually not
    predicted from theory based transport models1,2

1BARANOV, Y.F., et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
Fusion 46 (2004) 1181. 2TALA, T, et al., Nucl.
Fusion 46 (2006) 548.
13
ITB growth
  • The ITB will enhance the gradient in toroidal
    rotation
  • Thus the ITB itself may be able to push up
    ?ExB/?ITG.
  • As long as this ratio is high enough at the time
    of triggering
  • GYRO modelling1,2
  • Without rotation to gITG6-7 104 s-1

During growth phase
ITG fully stabilised
Before triggering
1DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Nucl. Fusion 49 (2009)
075007. 2 CANDY, J., and WALTZ, R.E, Phys. Rev.
Lett. (2003) 045001
ITG growth rate reduced to gITG1.5 104 s-1
14
Other devices
  • Similar/near identical results have been obtained
    in other devices
  • JT-60U using NBI balancing1
  • DIII-D using NBI balancing3

1SAKAMOTO, Y., et al., Nucl. Fusion 41 (2001) 865
2DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
Fusion 51 (2009) 124050. 3SHAFER, M.W, et al.,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 075004.
15
JET and JT-60U comparison
  • JT-60U and JET ITB identity experiments showed
    that differences in ITBs between both devices
    could be explained (partly) by rotation
    differences1
  • JT60U ?
  • ? at time of strongest ITB
  • o at time of ITB triggering
  • JET ?
  • ? at time of strongest ITB
  • o at time of ITB triggering

1DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
Fusion 51 (2009) 124050.
16
Turbulence and Profile Stiffness
  • Profile stiffness locally broken in the presence
    of and Internal transport barrier (ITB).

ITB growth
17
Turbulence and Profile Stiffness
  • But what about plasmas without ITBs? Does the
    rotation affect turbulence too?

?Tcrit usually set by ITG growth rate Stiffness
factor cs

?Tcrit
?Tcrit
Normalised Heat Flux, qi
?eff
Normalised Gradient R/LT
Neo-classical
18
Turbulence and Profile Stiffness
  • But what about plasmas without ITBs? Does the
    rotation affect turbulence too?

?Tcrit usually set by ITG growth rate Stiffness
factor cs
cs

cs
19
Stiffness and rotation(al shear)
  • Detailed experiments at JET indicate that the
    stiffness is affected by the plasma
    rotation/rotational shear
  • from power balance and modulation experiments

1 MANTICA, P. , et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102
(2009) 175002
20
Stiffness and rotation(al shear)
  • Latest analysis in suggest that the impact of the
    rotation on the profile stiffness may depend on q
    or q/q
  • Question Does a flat q profile enables the
    rotation(al shear) to affect the ion stiffness?

Core region (R3.33 m) lower q/q
Outer region (R3.60 m) higher q/q
Stiffness high for any rotation
Stiffness decreases with rotation
1 MANTICA, P. , JET Science Meeting (2009)
21
Conclusions/Discussion
  • Ion ITBs are triggered independent of the
    rotation
  • Strong player in the triggering process is the q
    profile
  • The ITB growth is strongly affected by the
    rotational shear
  • ITBs do not grow after triggering if the
    rotational shear is too low
  • Note that these results do not excluded other
    mechanisms that aid the growth of ITBs
  • such as fast-particles, etc.
  • The physics of electron ITBs differ all together
    (q-profile).
  • GYRO modelling suggest that ITG turbulence is
    suppressed in strong ITBs
  • Rotational shear affects the growth rate/critical
    gradient
  • Or is it the stiffness that is affected by the
    rotational and q?

22
List of Publications
  • Experimental observations of ITBs
  • CONNOR, J.W.,et al. 2004 Nucl. Fusion 44 R1
  • WOLF, R.C., Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 45
    (2003) R1-R91
  • CHALLIS, C.D.Plasma Phys. Control Fusion (2004)
    46 2004
  • CHALLIS, C.D., et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
    Fusion 43 (2001) 861
  • JOFFRIN, E., Nucl. Fusion 43 (2003) 1167
  • AUSTIN, M.E., Phys. Plasmas, 13 (2006) 082502
  • WALTZ, R.E., Phys. Plasmas 13 (2006) 052301
  • ...
  • ITBs and Plasma Rotation
  • BURRELL, K.H.,et al., Phys. Plasmas 4 (1997) 1499
  • DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
    Fusion 50 (2008) 065008.
  • DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Nucl. Fusion 49 (2009)
    075007
  • SAKAMOTO, Y., et al., Nucl. Fusion 41 (2001) 865
  • DE VRIES, P.C., et al., Plasma Phys. Control.
    Fusion 51 (2009) 124050.
  • SHAFER, M.W, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009)
    075004.
  • Gyro code
  • CANDY, J., and WALTZ, R.E, Phys. Rev. Lett.
    91(2003) 045001 (and refs. Therein)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com