Research Involving Human Subjects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Involving Human Subjects

Description:

Research Involving Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB) Judette Haddad, PhD, CIP Where Do I Find Information? Most information on guidelines, procedures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:166
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Marys95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Involving Human Subjects


1
Research Involving Human Subjects
  • Institutional Review Board
  • (IRB)
  • Judette Haddad, PhD, CIP

2
History and Ethical principles
  • Nuremberg Code 1947
  • Declaration of Helsinki 1964
  • National Research Act 1974
  • Belmont Report 1979
  • Respect for person- Informed consent
  • Beneficence- Favorable benefit-risk ratio
  • Justice- Selection of subjects
  • Public Heath Services Act 1985

3
Human Subject Protection Regulations
  • DHHS Regulations
  • 45 CFR part 46- Subparts A, B, C, D, E
  • FDA Regulations
  • 21 CFR part 50, Protection of Human Subjects
  • 21 CFR part 56, Institutional Review Boards
  • 21 CFR part 312, Investigational New Drug
    Application
  • 21 CFR part 812, Investigational Device
    Exemptions

4
OU Federal Wide Assurance
  • All research involving the participation of human
    subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB
    (Institutional Review Board for the Protection of
    Human Subjects).

5
DHHS Definition
  • 45 CFR 46.102(d)
  • Research means a systematic investigation,
    including research development, testing and
    evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to
    generalizable knowledge.

6
DHHS Definition (cntd)
  • 45 CFR 46.102(f)
  • Human subject means a living individual about
    whom an investigator (whether professional or
    student) conducting research obtains
  • (1) Data through intervention or interaction
    with the individual, or (2) Identifiable private
    information.

7
DHHS Definition (cntd)
  • Private Information
  • Information about behavior that occurs in a
    setting in which the individual can reasonably
    expect that no observation or recording is taking
    place
  • information that has been provided for specific
    purposes, other than research, where the
    individual can reasonably expect that it will not
    be made public (e.g., a medical record.) 45 CFR
    46.102(f).
  • Protected Health Identifiers (PHI)

8
DHHS Definition (cntd)
  • Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens
  • DHHS Office of Human Research Protection (OHRP)
    policy considers private information or specimens
    to be individually identifiable when they can be
    linked to specific individuals either directly or
    indirectly through coding systems.
  • DHHS OHRP guidance states that only a
    knowledgeable person or entity is authorized to
    determine if coded specimen or data constitute
    research. An investigator cannot make that
    determination.

9
Institutional Review Board
  • IRB is a review committee established to help
    protect the rights and welfare of human research
    subjects.
  • Authority of the IRB
  • Approve, disapprove, or modify research
  • Conduct continuing reviews
  • Observe and verify changes
  • Suspend or terminate approval
  • Observe the consent process and research
    procedures

10
Review Categories
  • Exempt
  • Expedited Review
  • Full board Review
  • Depends on the Risk Level (physical,
    psychological, social and economic risk)

11
What is minimal risk?
  • Minimal risk means that the probability and
    magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in
    the research are not greater in and of themselves
    than those ordinarily encountered in daily life
    or during the performance of routine physical or
    psychological examinations or tests.

12
Review Categories (cntd)
  • May be Exempt
  • Projects that present no more than minimal risk
    to the participants and do not compromise the
    privacy of the participants or confidentiality of
    the data
  • Fits 1 of 6 categories
  • Reviewed by IRB Chair or a designated member
  • Common in Educational Research- No identifiers

13
Review Categories (cntd)
  • May be Expedited
  • Projects that present no more than minimal risk
    to the participants, and for minor changes in
    approved research
  • Has to fit 1 of 7 categories
  • Reviewed and approved by 1 or 2 IRB Committee
    Members
  • Common in Educational Research for data
    collection methods that use audio/visual data
    collection- Retain identifiers

14
Review Categories (cntd)
  • Full Board Review
  • Projects involving more than minimal risk
  • Full Committee meets once per month (Applications
    must be received at least 10 days before the next
    meeting date)
  • Researcher are invited to present the research
  • Committee members ask the researcher questions
    regarding the research and participation of human
    subjects
  • Vote is taken (in the absence of the researcher)
    and recommendations are made

15
Review Categories (cntd)
  • Continuing Review
  • Annually for Expedited or Full Board approved
    applications.
  • Email notifications sent two month prior to
    approval expiration date.
  • Must complete the Continuing Review Form and
    attach a copy of the consent form.
  • Same type of review as the original application
    with some exceptions.

16
Review by Institution
  • Research that has been approved by an IRB may be
    subject to further appropriate review and
    approval or disapproval by officials of the
    institution.
  • However, institutional officials may not approve
    the research if it has not been approved by an
    IRB.

17
Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
  • 1. Risks to subjects are minimized
  • sound research design which do not unnecessarily
    expose subjects to risk,
  • using procedures already being performed on the
    subjects for diagnostic or treatment purposes.
  • 2. Risks to subjects are reasonable in relation
    to anticipated benefits, and the importance of
    the knowledge that may result.
  • 3. Selection of subjects is equitable.

18
Criteria for IRB Approval of Research (cntd)
  • 4. Informed consent is sought.
  • 5. Informed consent is appropriately documented.
  • 6. Plans for monitoring the data collected to
    ensure the safety of subjects.
  • 7. adequate provisions to protect the privacy of
    subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of
    data.
  • 8. additional safeguards to protect vulnerable
    population (children, prisoners, pregnant women,
    mentally disabled persons, or economically or
    educationally disadvantaged persons).

19
IRB Requirements
  • IRB must review
  • Qualification of the PI and collaborators
  • Full description about conflicts of interest
  • A complete description of the proposed research
  • Provisions for the adequate protection of rights
    and welfare of subjects
  • Compliance with pertinent federal and state
    laws/regulations and institutional policies

20
HIPAA Requirements
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability
    Act
  • Mandated standards for storage and transmission
    of healthcare information
  • HHS- The Privacy Rule Security Rule
  • The research must be HIPAA compliant
  • HIPAA language requirement in consent form
  • PHI- Protected Health Information- 18 identifiers
  • Authorization, Limited Data Set (16 ids) and Data
    Use Agreement
  • De-identified Health Information- No restrictions

21
Informed Consent Process
  • It is a process and not just a form.
  • It includes
  • Recruitment materials
  • Verbal instructions (in person or via video, DVD)
  • Written materials
  • Q A session(s)
  • Documentation of consent by signature

22
Informed Consent Process (cntd)
  • Participants must understand the nature of the
    research.
  • Participants must be able to knowledgeably and
    voluntarily decide whether or not to participate.
  • Participants must understand the risks and
    benefits of participation.
  • The IRB must determine that informed consent will
    be properly obtained.

23
Elements of Informed Consent
  • Eight Basic Elements
  • Research, Purpose, Procedures (experimental),
    Expected duration
  • Risks and discomfort
  • Benefit
  • Alternatives procedures (Treatments)
  • Confidentiality of records
  • Medical treatment in case of research related
    injury
  • Contact Info Research Qs, Rights Qs, Injury Qs
  • Participation is Voluntary

24
Elements of Informed Consent (cntd)
  • Additional elements, as appropriate
  • Unforeseeable Risk (embryo or fetus)
  • Participation may be terminated by researcher
  • Additional cost to subjects
  • Consequences of early withdrawal by subjects
  • Significant new findings that may affect wiliness
    to continue participation
  • Approximate number of participants

25
Elements of Informed Consent (cntd)
  • Voluntary
  • Consent if voluntary, free of coercive elements
  • Right to refuse or withdraw with no penalty
  • Unjustifiable pressures occur when persons in
    authority urge a course of action for a subject
  • Coercion is likely whenever possible sanctions
    are involved (implied or actual)
  • Undue influence occurs through an offer of an
    excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper
    reward
  • Consent process may not involve the use of
    exculpatory language

26
Elements of Informed Consent (cntd)
  • Comprehension
  • Organized
  • Ample time for consideration
  • Opportunities for questions
  • Lay language appropriate for subject

27
Waiver or Alteration of Consent
  • The IRB may approve a waiver or alteration of the
    consent process provided
  • The research involves no more than minimal risk
    to the subjects
  • The waiver or alteration will not adversely
    affect the rights and welfare of the subjects
  • The research could not practicably be carried out
    without the waiver or alteration and
  • Whenever appropriate, the subjects will be
    provided with additional pertinent information
    after participation.

28
Important Components of Protection
  • Minimizing Risk
  • Maintaining Confidentiality
  • Maintaining and Destroying Records
  • Maintained for at least 3 years after the
    completion of the study and then destroyed in a
    manner that will protect the identity of human
    subjects.
  • Reporting Adverse Events Related to Research

29
Approved Research
  • Research must be conducted as approved by the
    IRB.
  • Any changes to original application must also be
    approved before implementation.
  • Report changes to IRB through e-mail message to
    Dr. Haddad haddad_at_oakland.edu
  • IRB approval is valid for a maximum of one year
    a Continuing Review Form must be submitted to
    extend the research beyond one year.

30
How to Apply
  • Submit an application at http//www.oakland.edu/re
    search
  • All sections of the form must be completed.
  • An endorsed hard copy of the signature page must
    be forwarded to the Research Office, 530 Wilson
    Hall.
  • All research must be conducted or sponsored by an
    Oakland faculty member.
  • Non-tenured track professors and staff members
    may obtain a Special Permission to sponsor
    research.

31
What Happens?
  • For research falling within the categories of
    exempt or expedited review, maybe reviewed and
    approved within 2-3 weeks.
  • For research review by the full committee, you
    will be sent a written invitation to attend the
    committee meeting at which it will be discussed.
  • Investigator will provide explanations and
    rationale for all procedures, discuss the risks
    and benefits, and information about informed
    consent procedures.
  • If approved by the majority of IRB members
    attending the meeting, you will be notified in
    writing within a few days.

32
Faculty Responsibilities
  • All investigators conducting research involving
    human subjects need to be familiar with Oakland
    University IRB Guidelines http//www.oakland.edu/?
    id9074sid177
  • Complete CITI Training.
  • Faculty training is available periodically
    throughout the year.
  • Faculty must inform students with whom they are
    working to read OU Guidelines and complete CITI
    training.

33
Faculty Responsibilities (cntd)
  • Faculty must approve student application before
    it is submitted to the IRB.
  • All research must be exempted or approved before
    it can be conducted.
  • Research must be conducted as described in the
    approved or exempted application.
  • Research applications must be submitted through
    the Research Application Manager (RAM 2.0).

34
Where Do I Find Information?
  • Most information on guidelines, procedures, and
    submitting research applications can be found at
    http//www2.oakland.edu/research
  • Contact Dr. Judette Haddad (Compliance Officer)
    at haddad_at_oakland.edu or 370-4898.
  • Contact Dr. Chris Stiller (IRB Chair) at
    cstiller_at_oakland.edu or 370-4047.

35
Tips Before you Apply
  • Get a login and password for the RAM 2.0.
  • Be familiar with the questions that are asked on
    the application.
  • Write the major components of the application
    (Abstract, Protocol, Consent Form(s),
    Instruments).
  • Use the suggested language on the checklist
    within the consent form.
  • Attach other items given to subjects such as
    survey questionnaire or advertisements.
  • Allow ample time for the review process to take
    place.

36
CITI Training
  • Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative
  • https//www.citiprogram.org
  • Register- Choose OU as Participating Institution
  • Four Routes
  • Undergraduate Student
  • Graduate Students
  • Faculty and Staff
  • IRB Members
  • Mandatory Starting January 2011

37
CITI Course in Basic Human Subject Research
  • Undergraduate Students
  • 1. Oakland University
  • 2. Research Misconduct 1-1215
  • 3. Students in Research SBR

38
CITI Course in Basic Human Subject Research- OU
Maters Final Projects or Theses, and Doctoral
Dissertations
  • Oakland University
  • Belmont Report and CITI Course Introduction
  • Defining Research with Human Subjects SBR
  • Assessing Risk in Social and Behavioral Sciences
    SBR
  • Informed Consent SBR
  • Privacy and Confidentiality SBR
  • Records-Based Research
  • Internet Research SBR
  • Research and HIPAA Privacy Protections
  • Research Misconduct 1-1215
  • Data Acquisition, Management, Sharing and
    Ownership 1-1308
  • Conflicts of Interest and Commitment 1-1622
  • If Applicable
  • Research with Children SBR
  • Research with Prisoners SBR
  • Vulnerable Subjects - Research Involving Pregnant
    Women and Fetuses in Utero

39
CITI Course in Basic Human Subject Research-OU
Faculty Modules
  • Oakland University
  • Belmont Report and CITI Course Introduction
  • Defining Research with Human Subjects SBR
  • Assessing Risk in Social and Behavioral Sciences
    SBR
  • Privacy and Confidentiality SBR
  • HIPAA and Human Subjects Research
  • Data Acquisition, Management, Sharing, and
    Ownership
  • Informed Consent SBR
  • Conflicts of Interest in Research Involving Human
    Subjects
  • Records-Based Research
  • Internet Research SBR
  • If Applicable
  • Research with Children SBR
  • Research with Prisoners
  • Vulnerable Subjects Research Involving Pregnant
    Women and Fetuses in Utero

40
Questions?
  • haddad_at_oakland.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com