dual federalism 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

dual federalism 1

Description:

tyler larson christian gibbons morgan powell josh wendell branden mackinnon kayla delahoussaye what is federalism Definition- theory that two different governments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: pknockCom
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: dual federalism 1


1
dual federalism 1
  • tyler larson
  • christian gibbons
  • morgan powell
  • josh wendell
  • branden mackinnon
  • kayla delahoussaye

2
what is federalism
  • Definition- theory that two different governments
    share power over a certain region or people
  • Concept of balancing the scales of power between
    a large, sweeping government and a more local,
    centralized one
  • Involves federal authority and state regime
  • Theory works as type of check to ensure
    corruption doesnt impact either government
  • Designed to create tension between two forces
  • Federal government mandates certain rules that
    cover magnitude of smaller governments
  • State and local authorities responsible for
    everything else
  • Maintains balance of powers
  • the supremacy clause keeps federalism in motion

3
McCollloch V. Maryland 1819
  • Facts
  • Maryland (P) enacted a statute imposing a tax on
    all banks operating in Maryland not chartered by
    the state. The statute provided that all such
    banks were prohibited from issuing bank notes
    except upon stamped paper issued by the state.
    The statute set forth the fees to be paid for the
    paper and established penalties for violations.
  • The Second Bank of the United States was
    established pursuant to an 1816 act of Congress.
    McCulloch (D), the cashier of the Baltimore
    branch of the Bank of the United States, issued
    bank notes without complying with the Maryland
    law. Maryland sued McCulloch for failing to pay
    the taxes due under the Maryland statute and
    McCulloch contested the constitutionality of that
    act. The state court found for Maryland and
    McCulloch appealed.

4
  • Issues
  • Does Congress have the power under the
    Constitution to incorporate a bank, even though
    that power is not specifically enumerated within
    the Constitution?
  • Does the State of Maryland have the power to tax
    an institution created by Congress pursuant to
    its powers under the Constitution?
  • Holding and Rule
  • Yes. Congress has power under the Constitution to
    incorporate a bank pursuant to the Necessary and
    Proper clause (Article I, section 8).
  • No. The State of Maryland does not have the power
    to tax an institution created by Congress
    pursuant to its powers under the Constitution.

5
Gibbons V. Ogden 1824
  • Facts
  • New York granted Robert R. Livingston and Robert
    Fulton the exclusive right of steam boat
    navigation on New York state waters. Livingston
    assigned to Ogden the right to navigate the
    waters between New York City and certain ports in
    New Jersey.
  • Ogden (P) brought this lawsuit seeking an
    injunction to restrain Gibbons (D) from operating
    steam ships on New York waters in violation of
    his exclusive privilege. Ogden was granted the
    injunction and Gibbons appealed, asserting that
    his steamships were licensed under the Act of
    Congress entitled An act for enrolling and
    licensing ships and vessels to be employed in the
    coasting trade and fisheries, and for regulating
    the same. Gibbons asserted that the Act of
    Congress superseded the exclusive privilege
    granted by the state of New York.

6
  • Issues
  • May a state enact legislation that regulates a
    purely internal affair regarding trade or the
    police power, or is pursuant to a power to
    regulate interstate commerce concurrent with that
    of Congress, which confers a privilege
    inconsistent with federal law?
  • Do states have the power to regulate those phases
    of interstate commerce which, because of the need
    of national uniformity, demand that their
    regulation, be prescribed by a single authority?
  • Does a state have the power to grant an exclusive
    right to the use of state waterways inconsistent
    with federal law?
  • Holding and Rule
  • No. A state may not legislation inconsistent with
    federal law which regulates a purely internal
    affair regarding trade or the police power, or is
    pursuant to a power to regulate interstate
    commerce concurrent with that of Congress.
  • No. States do not have the power to regulate
    those phases of interstate commerce which,
    because of the need of national uniformity,
    demand that their regulation, be prescribed by a
    single authority.
  • No. A state does not have the power to grant an
    exclusive right to the use of state navigable
    waters inconsistent with federal law.

7
Dred Scott V. Sandford 1857
  • Facts
  • Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to
    1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and
    in an area of the Louisiana Territory, where
    slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise
    of 1820. After returning to Missouri, Scott sued
    unsuccessfully in the Missouri courts for his
    freedom, claiming that his residence in free
    territory made him a free man. Scott then brought
    a new suit in federal court. Scott's master
    maintained that no pure-blooded Negro of African
    descent and the descendant of slaves could be a
    citizen in the sense of Article III of the
    Constitution.

8
  • Issue
  • 1. Was Dred Scott free or slave?
  • Holding and Rule
  • 7 votes for Sandford, 2 vote(s) againstUS Const.
    Amend. 5 Missouri Compromise
  • Dred Scott was a slave. Under Articles III and
    IV, argued Taney, no one but a citizen of the
    United States could be a citizen of a state, and
    that only Congress could confer national
    citizenship. Taney reached the conclusion that no
    person descended from an American slave had ever
    been a citizen for Article III purposes. The
    Court then held the Missouri Compromise
    unconstitutional, hoping to end the slavery
    question once and for all.

9
works cited
  • http//negative-spring.blogspot.com/2012/03/memori
    al-sitesactiveactivist-voids.html
  • http//www.dipity.com/cuongluong/Era-Of-Good-Feeli
    ngs/
  • http//www.familycourtservices.org/resources-for-p
    arents/tips-to-prepare-for-court/
  • http//rationalpreparedness.blogspot.com/2012/02/w
    hat-was-so-amazing-about-america.html
  • O'Connor, Karen, and Larry Sabato. American
    Government Continuity and Change. New York
    Pearson Longman, 2006. Print.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com