Sida

1
Sidas Humanitarian Work
2
Sidas Strategy for Humanitarian Work 2008-2010

• Based on the Governments Humanitarian Policy
  (2005).
• Aim Save lives, alleviate suffering and maintain
  human dignity.
• Guided by international law and humanitarian
  principles (humanity, independence, impartiality
  and neutrality).
• Stresses GHD (quick, predictable, flexible,
  needs-based).
• Projects through the UN, Red Cross, NGOs and
  relevant authorities.
• Appropriation can be used for Disaster
  Preparedness and should support transition to
  recovery and longer-term development.
• Promote the international humanitarian system
  through contributions to research, method
  development and capacity development
  (secondments).
• Assist the MFA in advancing the development of
  international humanitarian policy.

3
The Humanitarian Team
Policy Specialist Human Security
Controller
ATHA Project Leader

• 15 persons
• 16 languages
• 77 years of field experience
• From the Red Cross, UN, NGOs, private sector

4
Swedish Humanitarian Assistance
GREENLAND
ALASKA (USA)
SWEDEN
ICELAND
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
FINLAND
NORWAY
CANADA
ESTONIA
LATVIA
DENMARK
LITHUANIA
BELARUS
REPULIC OFIRELAND
UNITEDKINGDOM
POLAND
GERMANY
NETHERLANDS
BELGIUM
CZECHREPUBLIC
UKRAINE
KAZAKHSTAN
SLOVAKIA
AUSTRIA
HUNGARY
MONGOLIA
SWITZ.
FRANCE
ROMANIA
ITALY
UZBEKISTAN
BULGARIA
GEORGIA
GEORGIA
KYRGYZSTAN
SPAIN
NORTHKOREA
PORTUGAL
UNITED STATES of AMERICA
GREECE
TURKEY
TURKMENISTAN
TAHKISTAN
CHINA
SOUTHKOREA
JAPAN
SYRIA
AFGHANISTAN
IRAN
IRAQ
MOROCCO
TUNISIA
PAKISTAN
ALGERIA
NEPAL
LIBYA
EGYPT
WESTERN SAHARA
SAUDIARABIA
MEXICO
TAIWAN
UAE
INDIA
OMAN
VIETNAM
CUBA
MYANMAR
MAURITANIA
LAOS
MALI
NIGER
CHAD
SUDAN
THAILAND
YEMEN
HONDURAS
GUATEMALA
SENEGAL
PHILIPPINES
NICARAGUA
CAMBODIA
BURKINA
GUINEA
NIGERIA
COSTA RICA
ETHIOPIA
VENEZUELA
PANAMA
GHANA
SRILANKA
COTEDIVOIRE
CENTRALAFRICAN REPUBLIC
LIBERIA
GUYANA
FRENCHGUIANA
CAMEROON
COLOMBIA
MALAYSIA
SURINAME
SOMALIA
UGANDA
KENYA
GABON
CONGO
ECUADOR
DEMOCRATICREPUBLIC OFCONGO
TANZANIA
PAPUANEW GUINEA
INDONESIA
BRAZIL
PERU
ANGOLA
ZAMBIA
BOLIVIA
MOZAMBIQUE
MADAGASCAR
ZIMBABWE
NAMIBIA
BOTSWANA
PARAGUAY
AUSTRALIA
REPUBLICOF SOUTHAFRICA
URUGUAY
CHILE
ARGENTINA

• Countries with humanitarian projects 2007
• Sida field presence
• SIda field presence with humanitarian profile

NEWZEALAND
5
Geographical division
GREENLAND
ALASKA (USA)
SWEDEN
ICELAND
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
FINLAND
NORWAY
CANADA
ESTONIA
LATVIA
DENMARK
LITHUANIA
BELARUS
REPULIC OFIRELAND
UNITEDKINGDOM
POLAND
GERMANY
NETHERLANDS
BELGIUM
CZECHREPUBLIC
UKRAINE
KAZAKHSTAN
SLOVAKIA
AUSTRIA
HUNGARY
MONGOLIA
SWITZ.
FRANCE
ROMANIA
ITALY
UZBEKISTAN
BULGARIA
GEORGIA
GEORGIA
KYRGYZSTAN
SPAIN
NORTHKOREA
PORTUGAL
UNITED STATES of AMERICA
GREECE
TURKEY
TURKMENISTAN
TAHKISTAN
CHINA
SOUTHKOREA
JAPAN
SYRIA
AFGHANISTAN
IRAN
IRAQ
MOROCCO
TUNISIA
PAKISTAN
ALGERIA
NEPAL
LIBYA
EGYPT
WESTERN SAHARA
SAUDIARABIA
MEXICO
TAIWAN
UAE
INDIA
OMAN
VIETNAM
CUBA
MYANMAR
MAURITANIA
LAOS
MALI
NIGER
CHAD
SUDAN
THAILAND
YEMEN
HONDURAS
GUATEMALA
SENEGAL
PHILIPPINES
NICARAGUA
CAMBODIA
BURKINA
GUINEA
NIGERIA
COSTA RICA
ETHIOPIA
VENEZUELA
PANAMA
GHANA
SRILANKA
COTEDIVOIRE
CENTRALAFRICAN REPUBLIC
LIBERIA
GUYANA
FRENCHGUIANA
CAMEROON
COLOMBIA
MALAYSIA
SURINAME
SOMALIA
UGANDA
KENYA
GABON
CONGO
ECUADOR
DEMOCRATICREPUBLIC OFCONGO
TANZANIA
PAPUANEW GUINEA
INDONESIA
BRAZIL
PERU
ANGOLA
ZAMBIA
BOLIVIA
MOZAMBIQUE
MADAGASCAR
ZIMBABWE
NAMIBIA
BOTSWANA
PARAGUAY
AUSTRALIA
REPUBLICOF SOUTHAFRICA
Sudan 251 645 000 (12) DRC 171 368 000
(8) oPt 128 796 000 (6) Somalia 115 368 000
(6) Uganda 105 275 000 (5)
URUGUAY
CHILE
ARGENTINA
NEWZEALAND
6
Allocations 2001 2008 (MSEK)
Year AllocationDisbursed 2001 1 077 1 306 2002
930 1 222 2003 1 100 1 262 2004 1 530 1
610 2005 1 942 1 877 2006 1 970 2 012 2007 2
045 2 064 2008 2 010
7
10 largest partner organisations 2007
8
Våra uppdrag

• Sidas humanitarian support separate allocation
• CAP Flash Appeals
• Red Cross Minor hum. frames
• SRSA Single projects
• Early recovery with delegated funds
• Disaster Risk Reduction and prevention
• Counselling in humanitarian affairs

9
Guiding Principles
Good Humanitarian Donorship
Save lives, reduce suffering, maintain
dignity. Humain, impartial, neutral and
independent.
Non-political assistance in politicised
environment. Based on needs, no concentration to
countries. Sida presence in fewer countries
requires new methods.
10
The Humanitarian VIsion
Competence
Strengthen the Swedish humanitarian competence
through strategic recruitment, secondment and
training.

Capacity
Increase Swedens joint humanitarian capacity
through strengthening humanitarian competence in
the field.

Effectiveness
Quick and competens processing of humanitarian
projects, i e no reduction of capacity at HQ in
Sweden.

• Ascertaining the quality of Swedish humanitarian
  assistance through
• Knowledge and understanding
• Presence and follow-up
• Speed and predictability

Quality