MIMOSA: Enabling E-Maintenance Through Open MRO Integration Standards November 2001

1
MIMOSAEnabling E-MaintenanceThrough Open MRO
Integration Standards November 2001

• Peter Hills
• General Manager Affiliate Companies
• Rockwell Automation - Entek
• Chester UK

2
Problem Today In e-Maintenance / e-Service
Islands of Information
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems
Control Systems Production Schedulers
Engineering Product Data Mgmt. Systems
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Condition Monitoring Systems
Maintenance Scheduler (EAM/ CMMS) Systems
Predictive Reliability Systems
3
Problem Today In MRO / e-Maintenance / e-Service
Islands of Information
4
Problem Today In MRO / e-Maintenance / e-Service
Islands of Information

• Information islands -- specialized, proprietary
  systems, optimized for a specific task or tasks,
  provide best results and value
• Each island speaks a different data language

5
Integration Option 1 Avoid Bridge-Building

• Purchase as many systems as possible from one
  vendor
• Advantages
• Single-source to resolve problems /
  incompatibilities
• Low risk
• Disadvantages
• Not possible to get a complete off-the-shelf
  solution from one supplier
• Possibly dependent on proprietary interfaces
• Each product may not be the best-of-breed
  solution
• Less customization

6
Integration Option 2 Buy a Custom Bridge

• Buy a Pre-designed Gateway Offered By A Supplier
• Advantages
• Lower cost Cost shared among all who purchase
  the gateway
• Lower risk than using internal IS resources to
  build a gateway
• Disadvantages
• Possibly dependent on proprietary interfaces
• If relationship between the two suppliers sours,
  then gateway is in jeopardy
• Must continually buy/fund updates to the gateway
  for new system versions
• Less customization

7
Integration Option 3 Build a Custom Bridge

• Build Your Own Gateway Through Integration
  Company or Internal IT Group
• Advantages
• Highly customizable to plant needs
• Short-term strategic benefit to company
• Disadvantages
• High risk due to unforeseen incompatibility
  issues
• High cost due to lack of multiple users
• Difficult to resolve problems -- finger-pointing
  possible with suppliers
• Possibly dependent on proprietary interfaces
• High annual software maintenance cost (estimated
  20 of original cost)
• 1 Million Integration Project (200,000 annual
  maintenance cost)

8
Integration Option 4 Use an Open System Bridge

• Build or Buy an Industry-Standard Gateway
• Advantages
• Engineered Plug-and-Play System Capability
  Designed Up-front Into System
• Saves You From Burden of On-going Integration
  Efforts
• More Freedom to Choose Best Technology From
  Information Supplier (Plug Play)
• Forms the Information Backbone of e-Maintenance
• Disadvantages
• Suppliers Must Support Industry Standard
• Standard Gateway May Have Some Performance
  Degradations from Custom Interface

9
Why is the Open Systems Approach Preferable?

• End-user Perspective
• Plug-and-Play System Capability Designed Up-front
  Into System
• Saves End-User Burden of On-going Integration
  Efforts
• More Freedom to Choose Best Technology From
  Information Supplier (Plug Play)
• Supplier Perspective
• Concentrate Resources on Highest Value,
  Core Competency Instead of Low Value
  Platform and Custom Interface Requirements
• Stimulate New Markets Expansion of Industry

10
Problem Today In e-Maintenance / e-Service
Whats the Solution to the Islands of
Information?
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems
Control Systems Production Schedulers
Engineering Product Data Mgmt. Systems
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Condition Monitoring Systems
Maintenance Scheduler (EAM/ CMMS) Systems
Predictive Reliability Systems
11
The Solution To e-Maintenance / e-Service
Utilize Open System Gateways
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems
Control Systems Production Schedulers
Engineering Product Data Mgmt. Systems
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Equipment e-Maintenance Information Bus
Gateway
Gateway
Gateway
Condition Monitoring Systems
Maintenance Scheduler (EAM/ CMMS) Systems
Predictive Reliability Systems
12
The Solution To e-Maintenance / e-Service
Utilize Open System Gateways
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems
Control Systems Production Schedulers
Engineering Product Data Mgmt. Systems
OAGI
OPC / ISA S95
STEP
Equipment e-Maintenance Information Bus
MIMOSA
MIMOSA
MIMOSA
Condition Monitoring Systems
Maintenance Scheduler (EAM/ CMMS) Systems
Predictive Reliability Systems
Technical Committee 108
13
What Is The Machinery Information ManagementOpen
Systems Alliance (MIMOSA)?

• A Maintain, Repair, Operate (MRO) Industry Trade
  Association Organized
• Focus is on Open Maintenance, Reliability, and
  Logistic System Interfaces
• Non-profit Corporation
• 50 Sponsors Members in 9 Countries
• MRO Solution Technology Vendors
• Condition Monitoring / Condition-based
  Maintenance (CBM) Solution Vendors
• Computerized Maintenance Management System
  (CMMS)/Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Vendors
  - (Maintenance Logistics System Vendors)
• Capital Equipment OEMs
• Systems Integrators
• Equipment Operators Maintainers
• MRO Solutions Consultants

14
MIMOSA Sponsors
15
The Purpose of MIMOSA
To promote and enable the use of open MRO
information systems
16
The Vision of MIMOSA
To enrich and simplify complex MRO information
systems solutions by creating open, defacto
integration interoperability standards.
17
The Vision of MIMOSA

• Open MRO Information System Integration Enables
• Multi-Vendor Solutions
• Cross Platform Solutions
• Cross Industry Solutions
• Comprehensive Maintenance Repair Solutions
  Properly Incorporating Corrective Maintenance
  (CM), Preventive Maintenance (PM) Condition
  Based Maintenance (CBM)
• Asset Registry Information Facilitates
• Integration with Operating Information for
  Complete MRO Solutions
• Service-Segments and Assets can be tracked over
  their life-cycles for Asset Management
  Requirements

18
The Value of MIMOSA

• Specifications - Open, Industry-Built, Robust MRO
  Information Integration Specifications
• Enabling end-to-end, vertical horizontal
  information integration
• XML-based specifications are true enabler for
  multi-vendor e-maintenance initiatives
• Faster, better cheaper solutions
• Trade Association Cooperative MRO Market
  Development
• Value Added Network MIMOSA Information Network
  (MIN)
• MRO Industry Forum Subject Matter Experts in
  the Cross Disciplinary Technologies, Products
  Services needed to enable Complex MRO Solutions
  for
• Heavy Equipment OEMs
• Equipment operators maintainers
• CBM vendors subject matter experts
• EAM/CMMS vendors subject matter experts
• IS/IT subject matter experts
• Advocacy- MRO Industry-Sponsored Advocate for
• The capture, use reuse of consistently defined
  MRO information
• Open, industry-driven collaboration on the needed
  solutions

19
Government-Related MIMOSA MRO Initiatives

• Partnership with the OSA-CBM Program
• Strategic Relationship with Army PM-TMDE
• At Platform Commitment
• Fleet Management Project
• Project with Army CECOM/TMDE/TACOM/CASCOM
• Telemaintenance Architecture Development
• Concept Prototype Demonstration Project
• NAVSEA-TOSA Program
• MIMOSA Member
• Joint Services Demonstration Project
• National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS)
• Reciprocal Memberships
• Facilities Management Standard Development
• Joint Demonstration Project Under Discussion

20
Military Industrial Supply ChainProposed MRO
Extranet Macro Schema
XML Client
MIMOSA Compliant XML Interfaces provide a basis
for Open MRO Collaboration
Oversight/Regulatory Agencies
XML Server
XML Server
XML Client
GCSS-Air Force Maintenance Logistics System
3rd Party Maintenance Support
GCSS-Army Maintenance Logistics System
XML Client
XML Server
XML Server
XML Client
MFG Supply Chain
XML Server
XML Client
XML Client
GCSS-Marines Maintenance Logistics System
PMM System
Platform Integrator Customer Support
XML Platform Interface
XML Server
XML Server
XML Client
XML Client
XML Client
OEM Product Support
At Platform Diagnostic System
XML Server
XML Server
XML Server
GCSS-Navy Maintenance Logistics System
STD MRO Information Flows
XML Client
Component MFG Product Support
XML Client
XML Server
21
MIMOSA Standard Information Content

• Asset Identification
• Universal asset birth tag
• Allows birth to death asset tracking
• Nameplate and anatomy specification data
• Service Segment Identification
• Universal functional location tag
• Allows tracking of where an asset was in use over
  time
• Condition/Operating Measurement Location
• Universal measurement location tag
• Facilitates integration of multiple monitoring
  technologies
• Current/Historical Measurement Data
• Dynamic (Vibration/Sound) FFT, Time-waveforms
• Scalar (Process)
• BLOB (Documents / Image / Thermographic)
• Sampling (Fluid / Air / Gas)
• Diagnostic/Health/Prognostic Information
• Maintenance Work Requests / Work Histories
• Reliability/FMECA/Root Cause Data

22
MIMOSA Open XML-based Architecture
Supplier MIMOSA Tech-Server
Supplier/End-user MIMOSA Tech-Client Application
MIMOSA Site Zero Database Reference Entries
MIMOSA Tech-XML Client/Server Function Definition
MIMOSA Common-XML Client/Server Function
Definition
MIMOSA Common-XML Message Vocabulary
MIMOSA Common Relational Information Schema (CRIS)
MIMOSA Common-XML CRIS XML Vocabulary
eXtensible Markup Language (XML)
HTTP
TCP
IP
Ethernet
23
MIMOSA XML Sample Transaction Implementation
Request Generator

• HTTP/CGI

• Req. Initiation

• HTTP/CGI

• HTTP/CGI

24
MIMOSA XML Based Application Program Interface
(API) Conventions
MIMOSA 2.1 XML Server Specifications
MIMOSA 2.1 XML Client Specifications
Information Integration APIs
Supported Technologies REG (Asset Register
Management) TREND (Static Trends/Alarms) DYN
(Dynamic Vibration/Sound) BLOB/THERM
(Thermography) SAMPLE (Oil/Fluid/Gas/Solid
Tests) REL (Reliability / Data) DIAG (Diagnostics
/ Recommend) WORK (Request For Work)
Any MIMOSA 2.1 XML Server can support a
functional dialog with any MIMOSA 2.1 XML Client
if they support the same technologies (See
Descriptions at right).
25
MIMOSA As A Standards Safe Harbor

• ISO 13374 Standard Being Finalized by ISO
  TC108/SC5/WG6
• TC108--Shock Vibration
• Subcommittee 5 (Machinery Condition Monitoring
  Analysis)
• Working Group 6 (Data Processing, Communication
  Format, and Presentation Requirements).
• MIMOSA Specifications will be ISO Compliant and
  will be an Appendix to the ISO Specifications as
  an Informative Reference .

26
MIMOSA Information Network Schema
27
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
28
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
29
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
30
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
31
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
32
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
33
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
34
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
35
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
36
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
37
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
38
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
39
MIN-Viewer Demonstration
40
For More Information On MIMOSA
Corporate Information Alan Johnston President MIMO
SA 1738 Ridgemont Dr. Tuscaloosa, AL 35404 TEL
205-553-8104 FAX [phone] EMAIL
atjohn_at_attglobal.net WEB www.mimosa.org
Membership Information Tom Bond Executive
Director MIMOSA 4259 Niagara Avenue San Diego, CA
92107-2909 TEL [phone] FAX
619-223-8531 EMAIL tbond_at_mimosa.org WEB
www.mimosa.org
Technical Information Ken Bever Technical
Director MIMOSA 1707 Old Farm Dr. Loveland, OH
45140 TEL [phone] FAX [phone] EMAIL
kbever_at_mimosa.org WEB www.mimosa.org
41
Conclusion

• Comprehensive information is the key to
  e-Maintenance
• Open systems reduce the cost of integrating
  systems
• Open systems reduce the cost of ownership and
  allow a plug-and-play environment for
  reliability asset health systems
• MIMOSA-based Standards Offer a Solid Path Forward