Using assessment to improve learning: why, what and how? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Using assessment to improve learning: why, what and how?

Description:

... health For society Lower criminal justice costs Lower health ... quality requires teacher professional ... competence challenge Flow ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:143
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: dylanwili
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using assessment to improve learning: why, what and how?


1
Using assessment to improve learningwhy, what
and how?
  • Dylan Wiliam
  • Institute of Education
  • Cambridge Assessment Network seminar on
    Assessment for Learning
  • Cambridge, UK September 2006

2
Overview of presentation
  • Why raising achievement is important
  • Why investing in teachers is the answer
  • Why assessment for learning should be the focus
  • How we can put this into practice

3
Raising achievement matters
  • For individuals
  • Increased lifetime salary
  • Improved health
  • For society
  • Lower criminal justice costs
  • Lower health-care costs
  • Increased economic growth

4
Wheres the solution?
  • Structure
  • Small schools
  • Big schools
  • Alignment
  • Curriculum reform
  • Textbook replacement
  • Governance
  • Specialist schools
  • Vouchers
  • Technology

5
Its the classroom
  • Variability at the classroom level is up to 4
    times greater than at school level
  • Its not class size
  • Its not the between-class grouping strategy
  • Its not the within-class grouping strategy
  • Its the teacher

6
Teacher quality
  • A labour force issue with 2 solutions
  • Replace existing teachers with better ones?
  • No evidence that more pay brings in better
    teachers
  • No evidence that there are better teachers out
    there deterred by certification requirements
  • Improve the effectiveness of existing teachers
  • The love the one youre with strategy
  • It can be done
  • We know how to do it, but at scale? Quickly?
    Sustainably?

7
Learning power environments
  • Key concept
  • Teachers do not create learning
  • Learners create learning
  • Teaching as engineering learning environments
  • Key features
  • Create student engagement (pedagogies of
    engagement)
  • Well-regulated (pedagogies of contingency)

8
Why pedagogies of engagement?
  • Intelligence is partly inherited
  • So what?
  • Intelligence is partly environmental
  • Environment creates intelligence
  • Intelligence creates environment
  • Learning environments
  • High cognitive demand
  • Inclusive
  • Obligatory

9
Motivation cause or effect?
high
arousal
Flow
anxiety
challenge
control
worry
relaxation
apathy
boredom
low
low
competence
high
(Csikszentmihalyi, 1990)
10
Why pedagogies of contingency?
  • Several major reviews of the research
  • Natriello (1987)
  • Crooks (1988)
  • Kluger DeNisi (1996)
  • Black Wiliam (1998)
  • Nyquist (2003)
  • All find consistent, substantial effects

11
Cost/effect comparisons
Intervention Effect (sd) Cost/yr/classroom
Class-size reduction (by 30) 0.1 20k
Increase teacher content knowledge by 1 sd 0.1 ?
Formative assessment/ Assessment for learning 0.20.3 2k
12
Five key strategies
  • Clarifying and understanding learning intentions
    and criteria for success
  • Engineering effective classroom discussions that
    elicit evidence of learning
  • Providing feedback that moves learners forward
  • Activating students as instructional resources
    for each other
  • Activating students as the owners of their own
    learning

13
and one big idea
  • Use evidence about learning to adapt instruction
    to meet student needs

14
Keeping Learning on Track (KLT)
  • A pilot guides a plane or boat toward its
    destination by planning a route, taking constant
    readings and making careful adjustments in
    response to wind, currents, weather, etc.
  • A KLT teacher does the same
  • Plans a carefully chosen (possibly
    differentiated) route ahead of time (in essence
    building the track)
  • Takes readings along the way
  • Changes course as conditions dictate

15
Formative assessment Assessment for Learning
  • Assessment for learning is any assessment for
    which the first priority in its design and
    practice is to serve the purpose of promoting
    pupils learning. It thus differs from assessment
    designed primarily to serve the purposes of
    accountability, or of ranking, or of certifying
    competence. An assessment activity can help
    learning if it provides information to be used as
    feedback, by teachers, and by their pupils, in
    assessing themselves and each other, to modify
    the teaching and learning activities in which
    they are engaged.
  • Such assessment becomes formative assessment
    when the evidence is actually used to adapt the
    teaching work to meet learning needs.
  • Black et al., 2002

16
Types of formative assessment
  • Long-cycle
  • Focus across units, terms
  • Length four weeks to one year
  • Medium-cycle
  • Focus within and between teaching units
  • Length one to four weeks
  • Short-cycle
  • Focus within and between lessons
  • Length
  • day-by-day 24 to 48 hours
  • minute-by-minute 5 seconds to 2 hours

17
Putting it into practice
18
A model for teacher learning
  • Content (what we want teachers to change)
  • Evidence
  • Ideas (strategies and techniques)
  • Process (how to go about change)
  • Choice
  • Flexibility
  • Small steps
  • Accountability
  • Support

19
Content strategies and techniques
  • Distinction between strategies and techniques
  • Strategies define the territory of AfL (no
    brainers)
  • Teachers are responsible for choice of techniques
  • Allows for customization/ caters for local
    context
  • Creates ownership
  • Shares responsibility
  • Key requirements of techniques
  • embodiment of deep cognitive/affective principles
  • relevance
  • feasibility
  • acceptability

20
Design and intervention
Our design process
cognitive/affective insights
synergy/ comprehensiveness
set ofcomponents
Teachers implementation process
set of components
synergy/ comprehensiveness
cognitive/affective insights
21
Techniques for embeddingthe strategies in
practice
22
Questioning in Science
  • What can we do to preserve the ozone layer?
  • Reduce the amount of carbon dioxide produced by
    cars and factories
  • Reduce the greenhouse effect
  • Stop cutting down the rainforests
  • Limit the numbers of cars that can be used when
    the level of ozone is high
  • Properly dispose of air-conditioners and fridges

23
Questioning in English
  • Which of these is a good thesis statement?
  • The typical TV show has 9 violent incidents
  • There is a lot of violence on TV
  • The amount of violence on TV should be reduced
  • Some programs are more violent than others
  • Violence is included in programs to boost ratings
  • Violence on TV is interesting
  • I dont like the violence on TV
  • The essay I am going to write is about violence
    on TV

24
(No Transcript)
25
Practical techniques
  • Feedback
  • Not giving complete solutions
  • Three-fourths-of-the-way-through-a-unit test
  • Sharing learning intentions
  • Annotated examples of different standards to
    flesh out assessment rubrics (e.g. lab reports)
  • Opportunities for students to design their own
    tests
  • Students as owners of their own learning
  • Red/green discs
  • Students as instructional resources for one
    another
  • Pre-flight checklist

26
Putting it into practice
27
Why research hasnt changed teaching
  • The nature of expertise in teaching
  • Aristotles main intellectual virtues
  • Episteme knowledge of universal truths
  • Techne ability to make things
  • Phronesis practical wisdom
  • What works is not the right question
  • Everything works somewhere
  • Nothing works everywhere
  • Whats interesting is under what conditions
    does this work?
  • Teaching is mainly a matter of phronesis, not
    episteme

28
Knowledge transfer
After Nonaka Tageuchi, 1995
29
Supporting Teachers and Schools to Change through
Teacher Learning Communities
30
Implementing AfL requires changing teacher habits
  • Teachers know most of this already
  • So the problem is not a lack of knowledge
  • Its a lack of understanding what it means to do
    AfL
  • Thats why telling teachers what to do doesnt
    work
  • Experience alone is not enoughif it were, then
    the most experienced teachers would be the best
    teacherswe know thats not true (Hanushek, 2005)
  • People need to reflect on their experiences in
    systematic ways that build their accessible
    knowledge base, learn from mistakes, etc.
    (Bransford, Brown Cocking, 1999)

31
Thats what TLCs are for
  • TLCs contradict teacher isolation
  • TLCs reprofessionalize teaching by valuing
    teacher expertise
  • TLCs deprivatize teaching so that teachers
    strengths and struggles become known
  • TLCs offer a steady source of support for
    struggling teachers
  • They grow expertise by providing a regular space,
    time, and structure for that kind of systematic
    reflecting on practice
  • They facilitate sharing of untapped expertise
    residing in individual teachers
  • They build the collective knowledge base in a
    school

32
The synergy
  • Content assessment for learning
  • Process teacher learning communities
  • Components of a model
  • Initial workshops
  • Support for TLC leaders
  • Monthly TLC meetings
  • Peer observations
  • Drip-feed resources
  • Web-site
  • Writings
  • New ideas

33
Summary
  • Raising achievement is important
  • Raising achievement requires improving teacher
    quality
  • Improving teacher quality requires teacher
    professional development
  • To be effective, teacher professional development
    must address
  • What teachers do in the classroom
  • How teachers change what they do in the classroom
  • AfL TLCs
  • A point of (uniquely?) high leverage
  • A Trojan Horse into wider issues of pedagogy,
    psychology, and curriculum

34
Questions?Comments?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com