To provide new information for anyone who is familiar with the former School Improvement process

1
(No Transcript)
2
(No Transcript)
3
Purpose
Overview

• To provide new information for anyone who is
  familiar with the former School Improvement
  process
• To discuss the information that has been added
  to, deleted, or changed from the original School
  Improvement process

3
4
Overview
Overview

• The following have been added to the Overview
  portion of the Tools for Success document
• Federal Law (NCLB)
• School Improvement Plan Crosswalk
• Louisiana State Legislature Statute Regarding
• School Improvement Planning
• Systemic change is a cyclical process in which
  the impact of change on all parts of the whole
  and their relationships to one another are taken
  into consideration

3
5

• Comprehensive Needs Assessment
• Data Analysis
• Louisiana Needs Analysis
• (LANA)

6
Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Overview

• Data Analysis Template
• Created new charts for analyzing Percent
  Proficient Trend Data (Reading, Science, and
  Social Studies)
• Added graduation index and graduation rate
• Created new worksheets for LEAP/GEE, iLEAP Data
  Analysis

5
7
Louisiana Needs Analysis (LANA)
Overview

• Allows Faculty Needs Assessments to be entered by
  faculty
• Choice of Full LANA, Petit LANA, or
  Questionnaires only
• Added a Parent Questionnaire link on Team Tools

6
8
8
9
7
10

• Best Practices
• Scientifically Based Research Strategies
• Innovation Configuration

11
Scientifically Based Research Strategies
Overview

• Updated the Best Practices book
• There are now five strategies
• Created Innovation Configurations for Strategies
• Updated Resources

10
12
Innovation Configuration
Overview
Response to Intervention Innovation Configuration Response to Intervention Innovation Configuration Response to Intervention Innovation Configuration Response to Intervention Innovation Configuration Response to Intervention Innovation Configuration Response to Intervention Innovation Configuration
High Fidelity 4 Satisfactory 3 Needs Improvement 2 Low Fidelity 1 Rating
Universal Screening Early screening of all students to identify those at risk for academic and/or behavior difficulties Screening of all students to identify those at risk for academic and/or behavior difficulties Screenings are completed on students identified at risk for academic and/or behavior difficulties Screenings are completed on students who have a history of academic and/or behavior challenges
Progress Monitoring Student performance data is collected on a weekly basis and used to identify trend data Student performance data is collected on a monthly basis and used to identify trends Student performance data is collected on a quarterly basis and used to identify trend data Student performance data is collected on an annual basis and used to identify trends
Student performance is used to determine primary, secondary and tertiary preventions Student performance is used to determine primary and secondary preventions Student performance is used to determine secondary and tertiary preventions Student performance is used to determine interventions
Tiered Instruction/Interventions The instruction delivered to students varies on several dimensions that are related to the nature and severity of a students difficulties and allows for consistent progress Tiered Instruction/Interventions The instruction delivered to students varies on several dimensions that are related to the nature and severity of a students difficulties and allows for consistent progress Tiered Instruction/Interventions The instruction delivered to students varies on several dimensions that are related to the nature and severity of a students difficulties and allows for consistent progress Tiered Instruction/Interventions The instruction delivered to students varies on several dimensions that are related to the nature and severity of a students difficulties and allows for consistent progress Tiered Instruction/Interventions The instruction delivered to students varies on several dimensions that are related to the nature and severity of a students difficulties and allows for consistent progress Tiered Instruction/Interventions The instruction delivered to students varies on several dimensions that are related to the nature and severity of a students difficulties and allows for consistent progress
11
13
Tools for Success - Action Plan - Goals and
Objectives - Louisiana Measure of Progress
(LAMP) - Professional Development - Family and
Community Involvement - Curriculum -
Coordination of Resources - Degree of
Implementation (DIG)
14
Action Plan
Overview

• The SIP template has been streamlined and
• made more user friendly for schools.
• The Action Plan has been redesigned to include
• goal and objective.
• The Action Plan will include strategy, indicator
  of
• implementation, and desired outcomes.

12
15
Screen Shot of Action Plan

Overview
GOAL 1                                    
Research-Based Strategy 1 RTI JEPD DDD MEL CA SIM UDL Research-Based Strategy 1 RTI JEPD DDD MEL CA SIM UDL Research-Based Strategy 1 RTI JEPD DDD MEL CA SIM UDL Research-Based Strategy 1 RTI JEPD DDD MEL CA SIM UDL Research-Based Strategy 1 RTI JEPD DDD MEL CA SIM UDL Research-Based Strategy 1 RTI JEPD DDD MEL CA SIM UDL Research-Based Strategy 1 RTI JEPD DDD MEL CA SIM UDL
Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters)       Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters)       Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters)       Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters)       Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters)       Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters)       Indicator of Implementation (250 Characters)      
Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters)       Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters)       Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters)       Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters)       Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters)       Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters)       Procedures for Evaluating Indicators of Implementation (250 Characters)      
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES DESIRED OUTCOMES DESIRED OUTCOMES
1.1                                    
1.2                                    
Activity (500 Characters) Activity (500 Characters) Responsible Person (100 Characters) Start Date Completion Date Estimated Cost Funding Source
                  date date cost
                  date date cost
                  date date cost
Summative Evaluation (250 Characters)       Summative Evaluation (250 Characters)       Summative Evaluation (250 Characters)       Summative Evaluation (250 Characters)       Summative Evaluation (250 Characters)       Summative Evaluation (250 Characters)       Summative Evaluation (250 Characters)      
Implementation Issues (250 Characters) Date Presented Resolution(s) (250 Characters) Date Resolved
      date       date
      date       date
FCI-Indicates Family Community Involvement
Activities C-Indicates Curriculum
Activities N-Indicates Numeracy Activities D-
Indicates Discipline Support Activities L-Indicat
es Literacy Activities T-Indicates K12
Transition Activities
13
16
Action Plan
Overview

• The Action Plan pages have been reformatted to
  also include the following
• The Indicator and Procedures for evaluating the
  indicator are listed under each strategy and
  activity.
• The timeline for each activity must be addressed
  with a start date and completion date.
• Summative evaluations are inserted at the end of
  each strategy.

14
17
Mission, Goals, and Objectives
Overview

• Removed Vision, Mission, and Core Beliefs
• Sections
• Moved sample Goals and sample Objectives
• out of the Appendix into the body of the Tools
  
• for Success book
• Updated Resources

9
18
Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP)
Overview

• An optional school evaluation component has been
  added that will assist schools in monitoring
  student progress Louisiana Measure of Progress
  (LAMP)
• The LAMP is an optional tool which can be used by
  the school for frequent review of student
  performance (e.g., progress monitoring, benchmark
  assessments)

15
19
Screen Shot of LAMP
Overview
Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP) Louisiana Measure of Progress (LAMP)
                                 
Perspectives Desired Outcome Measure (Indicator of Progress) BaselineAug 2008 Target June 2009 September October November Qtr 1 Status December January February Qtr 2 Status March April May Qtr 3 Status
Student Performance To improve student reading comprehension skills. of students proficient on XXX reading assessment test in grade____.                      
Student Performance   of students receiving reading intervention in grade____.                      
Student Performance                          
Student Performance                          
Culture and Climate                          
Culture and Climate                          
Culture and Climate                          
Culture and Climate                          
Professional Development                          
Professional Development                          
Professional Development                          
Professional Development                          
Family/Community Involvement                          
Family/Community Involvement                          
Family/Community Involvement                          
Family/Community Involvement                          
StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target) StatusGreen Meets expectations (met at least 67 of 2008 targetYellow Improving but needs focus (between 33 and 66 of target did not meet 2008 target but improved over 2007 target) Red Not meeting expectations (below 33 of target did not meet 2008 target did not improve over 2007 target)
16
20
Professional Development
Overview

• This section includes the updated National Staff
  Development Council definition of Professional
  Development.
• Changes include moving documents from the
  Appendix to this section to provide clarity to
  the guiding questions as well as the general
  concept of professional development.
• Additional resources are added to the Appendix.

17
21
Family and Community Involvement
Overview

• The name has been changed from Family Involvement
  to Family and Community Involvement.
• Family and Community Involvement activity
  examples have been added to the Tools for
  Success.
• An appendix has been added for the Family and
  Community Involvement section.

18
22
Family and Community Involvement
Overview

• The Family and Community Involvement appendix
  will include the following
• 1118 - Parental Involvement
• NCLB, Title I, Part A - Parental Involvement (PI)
  - Calendar of Required Activities

19
23
Curriculum
Overview

• Added Content Literacy Strategy Descriptions to
  the Best Practices book
• Updated Resources

20
24
Coordination of Resources
Overview

• The SIP budget pages have been deleted.
• A column has been added to the new Action Plan
  page which identifies types of resources used and
  the cost.
• This section of the rubric remained the same with
  the exception of the first question being removed.

21
25
Degree of Implementation Guide (DIG)
Overview

• Added to Tools for consistency with other parts
  of School Improvement
• Web-based, quarterly reporting (currently in
  progress, as required by USDOE)
• All documents have been aligned to a 4-point
  rating scale designed to streamline quarterly
  reporting
• Protocols reviewed and edited for clarity

22
26
Screen shot of web-based DIG
Overview
23
27
Degree of Implementation Guide
Overview

• Options included for the use of school and
  district designed protocol
• Brief description of scientifically based
  research strategies added to the training
  document
• Instructions for DIG Team leaders includes more
  specific instructions and clarity to instructions
  where needed
• Thinking Map graphics included to add clarity to
  the process and responsibilities of leaders

24
28
Outcomes
Overview

• Streamlined School Improvement Plan - electronic
• Revised Tools for Success and Best Practices
• More efficient submission and review of School
  Improvement Plans

25
29
Next Steps
Overview

• LEA and School Trainings (April 2010)
• Live on eGrant (April 30, 2010)
• Full Implementation (2010-2011 SY)

25
30
Thank You
Overview

• Questions?
• School Improvement staff
• 225-342-4776
• 877-453-2721 (toll free)
• Rosemary.Enlow_at_la.gov
• Barbara.Foster_at_la.gov
• Georgette.Sterling_at_la.gov
• Tasha.Anthony_at_la.gov, Supervisor

26
31
(No Transcript)