- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

Photodetachment in Parallel Electric and Magnetic Fields J.N. Yukich, Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina Abstract We investigate photodetachment from negative ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: W34
Category:
Tags: analysis | pulse | wave

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
Photodetachment in Parallel Electric and Magnetic
Fields
J.N. Yukich, Davidson College, Davidson, North
Carolina
Abstract
We investigate photodetachment from negative ions
in a homogeneous 1.0 Tesla magnetic field and a
parallel electric field of 15 V/cm.
Calculations show that an electric field of 10
V/cm or more should considerably diminish the
Landau structure in the detachment cross
section.8 The ions are produced and stored in a
Penning ion trap. We present preliminary results
showing roughly a 30 decrease in the modulation
at the first Landau level with addition of the
electric field. We also discuss future
experiments.
Background
Detachment in Magnetic Fields
Ion trap apparatus, showing UHV vacuum, 2.0
Tesla electromagnet and magnet power supply.
Optical apparatus, showing diode laser MOPA
in foreground and wavemeter electro-optics.
Preliminary data
  • X- photon ? X e-
  • Considered as ½ of an electron-atom collision.
  • Minimum energy needed to detach is called the
  • electron affinity, analogous to photoelectric
    effect.
  • Electron detaches as plane wave into continuum.
  • Departing electron executes cyclotron motion in
    field.
  • Motion in plane perpendicular to B is quantized
    to
  • Landau levels separated by cyclotron ?
    eB/me.
  • For typical B 1.0 Tesla, ? 30 GHz, period
    36 ps.
  • Electron revisits atomic core once every
    cyclotron period.
  • Motion along axis of field is continuous,
    non-quantized.
  • Quantized Landau levels add structure to
    detachment
  • cross section. Structure results from electron
    wave
  • function interfering with itself as it revisits
    core.


Motivation
  • Photodetachment in combined E, B fields has
    received extensive theoretical attention, but
    little experimental attention.8-12
  • Effect of a parallel E field pushes the
    electron away from the atomic core as it executes
    cyclotron motion diminishes
  • or eliminates the wave function interference,
    and thus the Landau structure in the cross
    section.
  • Similar effect found with motional Stark field
    of a thermally energetic ion. Such fields
    diminish resolution of magnetic
  • field structure and spectroscopy.
  • Calculations (both full quantum-mechanical and
    semi-classical) predict 10 V/cm parallel to 1.0
    Tesla should
  • considerably diminish Landau structure, 30
    V/cm should almost completely eliminate Landau
    structure.


Preliminary data showing ratio of S- ions
surviving laser illumination near the 2P3/2 ?
3P2 threshold (electron affinity). Structure
observed at the first Landau level is diminished
when the electric field is added (B 1.0 Tesla).
 
 
Conclusions
  • Modulation structure at the first Landau level
    observed to be diminished by 30 when electric
    field
  • of 14 V/cm is added parallel to the 1.0 Tesla
    field.
  • Observations are consistent with theory
    predictions, but more detailed observations/analys
    is are needed.
  • Motional Stark fields present in the ion trap (
    8 V/cm) may play a significant role in
    diminishing
  • magnetic field structure in the detachment
    cross section.

Experimental technique
  • Ions produced by dissociative attachment from a
    carrier gas, using hot tungsten filament.
  • Ions trapped and stored in Penning ion trap (see
    figures below), with B 1.0 Tesla.3
  • Relative detachment cross section probed with
    highly-tunable, single-mode, amplified diode
    laser (see MOPA below).
  • Parallel electric field achieved by
    superimposing a 1 MHz radio frequency on the
    trap endcaps. On time scale of one
  • cyclotron period, electric field appears
    static to the ions.

Active Layer
Future Work
  • Current and future work will investigate
    identical phenomena in O-, which is easily
    accessible with the
  • diode laser MOPA.
  • To investigate What happens at higher E fields?
    What field is necessary to completely eliminate
    the
  • magnetic field structure? How is this
    condition approached with increasing electric
    field?
  • Evaporative cooling of trapped ion population
    does a reduced motional Stark effect enhance the
    magnetic
  • field structure? Can we improve spectroscopic
    resolution of Landau levels?
  • Replace hot tungsten filament with cold
    field-emission electron source to reduce further
    the trapped ion
  • population temperature.
  • Possible time-domain Ramsey interferometry of
    cyclotron wavepackets, with and without electric
    fields.
  • Possible investigations with THz radiation
    momentum kick given to electron by a half-cycle
    pulse may
  • yield further insight into the detached
    electrons interaction with the neutral core.

Apparatus
References
  1. M.C. Baruch, W.G. Sturrus, N.D. Gibson,
and D.J. Larson, Phys. Rev. A 45, 2825 (1992)
N.D. Gibson, B.J. Davies, and D.J Larson, Phys.
Rev. A 48, 310 (1993) M.C. Baruch, T.F.
Gallagher, D.J. Larson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65,
1336 (1990). 2. C.H. Bryant et al, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 58, 2412 (1987).  3. W.A.M. Blumberg,
R.M. Jopson, D.J. Larson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40,
1320 (1978) W.A.M. Blumberg, W.M. Itano, D.J.
Larson, Phys. Rev. A 19, 139 (1979).  4. I.
Yu. Kiyan and D.J. Larson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73,
943 (1994) J.N. Yukich, C.T. Butler, and D.J.
Larson, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3303 (1997).   5.
H.F. Krause, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 1725 (1990). 6.
C.H. Greene, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4236 (1987), H.
Crawford, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2432 (1988). 7.
M.L. Du and J.B. Delos, Phys. Rev. A 38, 5609
(1988). 8. M.L. Du, Phys. Rev. A 40, 1330
(1989) I.I. Fabrikant, Phys. Rev. A 43, 258
(1991). 9. Q. Wang and A.F. Starace, Phys.
Rev. A 48, R1741 (1993) Q. Wang and A.F.
Starace, Phys. Rev. A 51, 1260 (1995) Q. Wang
and A.F. Starace, Phys. Rev. A 55, 815
(1997). 10. A.D. Peters, C. Jaffe, and J.B.
Delos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2825 (1994) A.D.
Peters, C. Jaffe, and J.B. Delos, Phys. Rev. A
56, 331 (1997).  11. Z.Y. Liu and D.H. Wang,
Phys. Rev. A 55, 4605 (1997) Z.Y. Liu and D.H.
Wang, Phys. Rev. A 56, 2670 (1997).  12. M.L.
Du and J.B. Delos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1731
(1987) M.L. Du and J.B. Delos, Phys. Rev. A 38,
1931 (1988) W.P. Reinhardt, J. Phys. B 16, L635
(1983).  
  • Diode laser master oscillator power amplifier
  • Commercial diode laser seeds a high-gain tapered
    diode amplifier.
  • Highly-tunable, single-mode output.
  • Monitored by Fabry-Perot spectrum analyzer
    measured by
  • traveling Michelson-interferometer wavemeter.
  • Penning ion trap system
  • Trap consists of three hyperbolic electrodes
    coaxial with B field.
  • Biased trap endcaps form nearly-harmonic axial
    potential well.
  • Heterodyne detection system measures relative
    trapped ion
  • population before and after laser
    illumination.

Acknowledgements
  • This work has been supported by
  • Research Corporation
  • Davidson College
  • University of Virginia
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com