Popper and Wittgenstein

1
Popper and Wittgenstein

• the so-called principle of verification

2
Popper

• The criterion of falsifiability.Differentiate
  between a scientific theory it offers to the
  risk of refutation and an unscientific theory
  that escapes it.

3
Current neutrinos of the LHC.

• For example. The theory of relativity is offered
  to the risk of refutation. The speed of light is
  the maximum possible speed. That's why the
  scientific world has been put into turmoil by the
  CERN Neutrinos.
• In a sense Popper is right no scientific theory
  is definitely true. It is reliable because it has
  resisted attempts to refute

4
Wittgenstein -Popper

• But according to the theory of the representation
  of Wittgenstein. As you can tell that if I have a
  table in front of brown and say "this table is
  brown" I do a check?.
• In any case, the criterion of falsification
  falsified theories are no longer considered
  usable. So who is forced to remove the concept of
  probability. Because the concept of probability
  must assume the existence of thruth. But in this
  way seems to go down the idea of ?progress.

5
likely

• For Popper, we can not now say that Einstein's
  theory is more likely than Newton or more real
  fact Both are false. Moreover, the truth is
  infinite. So 1 infinity infinity just like
  1000 infinity infinity.

6
progress

• For Popper, you can not even speak of progress,
  since all theories giving false and falsified the
  truth has never been touched by them. This means
  that we must have a concept of limited and not
  infinite truth. Otherwise, progress could be seen
  as a departure from the origin.A journey implies
  a departure and an arrival. For Popper, we know
  only the start and progress is only a step away
  from starting.