Title: Enterprise Risk Management For Insurers and Financial Institutions
1EnterpriseRisk ManagementFor Insurers and
Financial Institutions
- David Ingram
- CERA, FRM, PRM
From the International Actuarial Association
2Course Outline
- 1. INTRODUCTION - Why ERM?
- 2. RISK MANAGEMENT FUNDAMENTALS FIRST STAGE OF
CREATING AN ERM PROGRAM - 3. RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK TREATMENT - ACTUARIAL
ROLES - 4. ADVANCED ERM TOPICS
3INTRODUCTION
- 1. INTRODUCTION - Why ERM?
- 1.1 Enterprise risk management history
- 1.2 What is enterprise risk management?
- 1.3 ERM the Financial Crisis
- 1.4 ERM Adoption in the Insurance Industry
4A Brief History of Risk Management
- 1952 Markowitcz Portfolio Theory Risk
variance - 1973 Black Scholes Derivative Pricing
variance is key driver - 1987 Black Monday Portfolio Insurance
implicated in record 1 day fall in stock market - 1992 Cadbury (UK) Report urges centralized,
comprehensive corporate RM - 1993 First CRO named at GE
5Current Trends in Risk Management
- Dedicated risk management function
- Risk Management decision making remains largely
decentralized - 2. Risk Aggregation / Economic Capital
- in early stages of development
- 3. Regulatory practices encourage ERM
- 4. Regulatory Capital ? Economic Capital
Basel Survey (August 2003)
6Risk Management Failures
- 1973 Equity Funding Fraud
- 1983 Baldwin United Shell Game
- 1986 The ZZZ Best Carpet Scandal.
- 1988 Equitable (NY) GIC losses.
- 1989 The US SL Crisis.
- 1991 Salomon Brothers Bond Scandal.
- 1991 BCCI Scandal.
- 1991 Executive Life / First Capital Life
Failures - 1991 Mutual Benefit Life Failure
- 1994 Orange County Default
- 1994 Kidder Peabody Fiasco.
- 1994 Confederation Life Failure
- 1994 Monarch Life Seizure
- 1995 The Barings Derivatives Scandal.
- 1996 Sumitomo Copper Scandal.
- 1997 The Natwest Hole.
- 1997 The Bre-X Mining Scandal.
- 1997 Smith Barney Investor Fraud.
- 1997 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Derivatives Loss.
- 1997 UBS Derivatives Model Problems.
- 1997 Prudential Insurance US Market Conduct
- 1998 Russian Bond Debacle.
- 1998 The Long-Term Capital Management Model
Failure. - 1999 General American Liquidity Failure
- 1999 Unicover Fiasco
- 2000 Equitable UK Pension guarantees
- 2001 American Express CBO Losses
- 2002 Enron Worldcom
- 2003 Parmalat
- 2003 Allmerica VA reserving
- 2003 Annuity Life Re Overgrowth
- 2004 Marsh Contingent Commissions
- 2005 AIG Finite Re
- 2006 Scottish Re Tax Asset
- 2006 Hurricane Katrina
- 2007 Countrywide Sub Primes
- 2008 Bear Sterns/ Lehman/ AIG Sub Prime
7Risk Management Failures
- Bank / Financial
- Barings Controls Missing, mgt didnt understand
risks - LTCM Models inadequate, overleveraging
- Northern Rock Excessive Growth
- Insurance
- Nissan Mutual ALM mismatch, underpricing
interest credits - Equitable UK underpriced annuities, poor
relationship with regulators - HIH insurance mispricing, underreserving
- Confed Life Over-concentration in illiquid
investments, shell game - General American ALM mismatch, rating
downgrade, downgrade trigger options - American International Group Small Financial
Group brings down Insurance giant
8Barings (UK)
- Venerable UK Bank
- Trading losses in Singapore
- Exceeded value of bank
- Problems
- Management didnt understand what the trader was
doing - Trades were not the hedged transactions they were
supposed to be - Trader did all reporting of trades
- No separation of duties
9Long Term Capital Management (US)
- Private Investment Fund
- Very highly Leveraged portfolio of investments
- Highly sophisticated risk management
- Capital was insufficient to withstand market
movement - Problems
- Risk Model was inadequate to predict 1998
international financial problems - Counterparties did not know the extant of their
full exposure
10Northern Rock (UK)
- Mortgage lender grew rapidly to become one of the
top 5 mortgage lenders in the UK - Had used securitization to fund mortgage lending
growth - Encountered liquidity problems when mortgage
securitization markets froze in Aug 2007 - Problem
- Request for help with liquidity from Bank of
England triggered first run on UK bank in over
100 years
11Nissan Mutual (Japan)
- Savings product guaranteed high interest rates
- High sales growth of this product
- Investment losses inadequate yield
- 200 billion net losses covered by Life
Association of Japan - Problem
- Asset Liability Mismatch
- Underpricing (over crediting) of interest
12Equitable (UK)
- Guaranteed payout annuity product sold to pension
plans - Improvement in mortality decline in interest
rates - Management tried to force solution on
regulators - Problem
- Underpricing poor Asset Liability matching
- Poor relationship with regulators lead to company
demise rather than workout
13HIH (AUS)
- Second largest General Insurer suddenly found
to be insolvent - Problem
- Total control failure at all levels
- Company, Auditor, Regulator
- Ultimate problem was fundamental underpricing and
overspending - Hidden by systematic underreserving
14Confederation Life (Can)
- Company invested over 70 of assets in Real
Estate - Company failed following valuation and liquidity
crunch - Concentration hidden by accounting
- Problem
- Lack of Diversification, Liquidity
- Limited oversight from regulators, rating
agencies due to accounting gimmicks
15General American Life (US)
- Funding agreement product sold to banks and
mutual funds with 7-day put option - Investments were made in 1 to 2 year maturity
securities - Partner handled large share of funds
- Downgrade of partner gttriggered downgrade of
company gt triggered calls - Company unable to raise cash for multi billion
calls - Problem
- Asset Liability Mismatch
- High dependency of business on ratings
- Huge Counterparty exposure
16American International Group
- In late 2006, AIG claimed to have 16B of excess
capital - In early 4th Quarter 2008, AIG needed over 100B
of funds from US government to meet obligations - Problem
- Small Financial Products unit has written
Trillions of CDS, some on sub prime CDOs - MTM losses lead to downgrade which leads to
collateral call
17Reasons for Current Interest in Risk Management
- World Markets Interdependent
- Chaos Theory Butterfly Effect
- Wide Use of Derivatives
- Financial WMD Warren Buffett
- Accelerated Pace of Business
- Recent Experiences of Losses
- 1998 International Currency Crisis
- 2001/2002 Terrorism Investment Losses
- Tsumani and Hurricanes
- Financial Crisis
18Reasons
- Tools for Risk Mgt are getting better and better
- Success of RM in banking over the past down cycle
(view in 2004) - No Major Bank Failures
- Insurance Companies in Europe fared much worse
with less Risk Mgt - Extreme over exposure to equities
- Insurance regulators are getting interested
- In many jurisdictions same regulators for banking
insurance
19Does the Global Financial Crisis prove that ERM
is Ineffective?
20Frequently Asked Question. ..
21- Study of 11 major banks in 2007
- Found differences in ERM Practices
22Better Risk Management Practices
- Four main differences in practices.
- Better-performing banks
- Shared risk and exposure information both quickly
and broadly among business unit staff, risk
management staff and top management. - Used rigorous internal practices and models,
consistent across all business units, to evaluate
their risk positions. - Coordinated cash planning centrally, avoiding or
limiting activities that created large contingent
liquidity needs and setting incentives to make
such activities unattractive to business unit
management. - Used multiple risk assessment tools and metrics
and generally had very adaptive risk models.
23Insurers should be concerned if
- Business Units are empowered to add significantly
to risk concentrations without frequent
disclosures to Top Management - Business Units apply different risk models
- Risk sign-off sometimes relies totally on the
presumption that someone else is doing good
analysis - Contingent risks are not usually identified
- Risk models are inflexible, requiring changes to
be planned out a year in advance - Nobody believes those stress tests anyway, so we
dont put much time into them
24Insurers should be encouraged if
- Open communications among Business Units, Risk
Management staff and Top Management - Enterprise level decision-making about major risk
accumulations - Systematic internal evaluation of risks
- Low reliance on third party risk evaluations
- Identification of and plans for contingent risks
- Incentives for business units to minimize
contingent risks - Multiple risk management tools and metrics
- Flexible and adaptive risk models
- Aggregation of net and gross exposures in
addition to expected losses - Stress testing that is credible to Top Management
25ERM Seatbelts
- They only work if you use them!
26Risk Management is
- Setting enforcing limits for all firm risks
that are appropriate for the capital of the firm. - Increasing rewarding activities with superior
risk adjusted return and fixing or limiting
activities with inferior risk adjusted return. - Identifying preparing for special events that
could significantly impair the earnings \or the
solvency of the firm.
27Benefits of Risk Management(James Lam)
- Market Value Improvement
- Due to decreased volatility
- 2. Early Warning of Risks
- Risk management replaces
- Crisis Management
- 3. Reduction of Losses
- 4. Rating Agency Capital Relief
- 5. Risk Transfer Rationalization
- Reinsurance cost/benefit
- 6. Corporate Insurance Savings
28ERM Framework
Change Risk Management
Value optimization
Strategic
Strategic integration
Risk measurement
Risk Controlling
Risk management
Risk Steering
Loss minimization
Risk Trading
Compliance
Tactical
Value creation
Balance sheet protection
Risk/return optimization
Risk control
29Scope of ERM
- Risk Controlling
- Limit exposures and therefore losses
- ERM adds Aggregate approach to risk tolerance
- Risk Trading
- Getting paid for risks taken
- ERM adds consistent approach to risk margins
- Risk Steering
- Strategic choices to improve value
- ERM adds risk vs. reward point of view
- Change Risk Management
- Managing the risks from new projects, products,
territories, - ERM adds fitting into the risk profile ERM
program
30Potential Benefits of Effective Risk Management
Better able to take advantage of new business
opportunities.
Reduction in management time spent fire-fighting
Higher share price
- Increased likelihood of change initiatives being
achieved.
Potential Benefits (ICA)
Fewer sudden shocks and unwelcome surprises.
More focus internally on doing the right things
properly.
Lower cost of capital.
Competitive advantage.
Better basis for strategy setting.
31Moodys View of Risk Management
- Environment More Risky
- More complex products
- Higher regulatory scrutiny
- Reinsurers leaving markets
- Insurers Response
- Stress Testing
- Risk Management Committee/CRO
32What is the difference between Risk Management
and ERM?
- An ERM Program comprehensively applies Risk
Management - across ALL of the significant risks of the
Enterprise - Consistently across the risks
- Consistently with the fundamental objectives of
the enterprise - Standard Poor's
33Full Benefits of an ERM Program
- Once a firms enterprise wide risks are
identified and objectives are set, an ERM Program
should - Develop and maintain systems to periodically
measure the capital needed to support the
retained risks of the company - Reflect the risk capital in
- strategic decision making,
- product design and pricing,
- strategic and tactical investment selection
- financial performance evaluation
- The product of a fully-realized ERM Program is
the optimization of enterprise risk adjusted
return - Standard Poor's
34Benefits of Integrated Risk Management Strategy
- Avoid land mines and other surprises
- Improve Stability Quality of Earnings
- Enhance growth and shareholder return
- By more knowledgeably exploiting risk
opportunities - Identify specific opportunities such as natural
synergies risk arbitrage - Reassure stakeholders that the business is well
managed
Life Office Management Association (USA)
35Management Level 1 Planning
36Management Level 2 Scenario Testing
37Management Level 3 Scenario Analysis
Average Scenario
Confidence Interval
38Management Level 4 Risk Management
Average Scenario
Confidence Interval
39ERM Benefits Uses
- Insurance Risk Taking
- Risk Management Management
- for Insurance Companies
- Risk Management gt systematic risk selection
- as more insurance companies adopt risk management
they will select the better risks - companies without RM will not know
40ERM Benefits Uses
- Communicating with Rating Agencies
- Risk Management can provide language for dialogue
with RA - Communicating with Board
- Markets become more volatile
- as more financial institutions use Risk Management
41(No Transcript)
42Solvency 2 ERM
- Pillar 2
- Article 43 requires firms to have an effective
risk management system. - Requires firms to consider all risks
- Risk management system to be fully integrated
into the organisation
43GFC ERM
- Progress has been made in strengthening . . .
Risk Management - Leaders' Statement from G20 Summit, 2009
44Questions
Questions??
45Key Points from Intro
- Risk Management has evolved over many years.
- Learning from Failures.
- Interest in Risk Mgt is increasing.
- Risk Management is preventing losses and
improving risk adjusted return. - Risk Management replaces Crisis
Management.
46(No Transcript)
47(No Transcript)
48(No Transcript)