Title: Analysis, Design, and Control of
1Analysis, Design, and Control of Movable
Neuro-Probes
Z. Nenadic, E. Branchaud, R.
Andersen, J. Pezaris, W. Collins, and J.
Burdick B. Greger, B. Pesaran
Engineering and Applied Science
Biology California
Institute of Technology
(Auxiliary Program Started April 1, 2001)
2Limitations of Current Neuro-Probe Technology
Key Challenge record high quality signals from
many neurons (for months/years)
- Fixed positioning of implant
- Non-optimal (or wrong!) receptive fields.
- Electrode not near cell body.
- Low impedance (poor SNR) design required.
- Gliosis and encapsulation
3- Movable Probe Concept computer controlled
movable probes can - track moving neurons, find new neurons, break
through encapsulation. - Project Goals
- Short term validate concept, enable more
complex acute experiments - Intermediate term Develop design specs for MEMS
devices - Long term develop MEMS technology for
implantable devices (see talk by Y.C. Tai)
4Current Research Program Outline
- Theory develop algorithms for probe control
using modeled (computational) environment - Model extra-cellular neuron potentials
- Characterize local field potentials (LFP)
- Control algorithm development guided by
computational model
- Implementation meso-scale hardware test-beds
- Validate concept, evaluate algorithms
- Enable testing of Biomechanical issues of
chronic movable probe operation
5Single Cell Extracellular Potential Simulation
3720 compartment NEURON pyramidal cell model
(adapted from Mainen Sejnowski 96) Synaptic
inputs scattered uniformly throughout dendrites.
Laplace equation Boundary condition Since
solution nearly impossible, use line source
approximation (Holt Koch 99)
6(No Transcript)
7Spatial Variation of Extracellular Potential
8Peak-to-peak amplitude Tuning curve
Added noise -- independent, Gaussian, zero-mean
Noise variance -- determined by signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR)
9Movable Probe Feedback
10Movie 1
Movie 2
11Movable Probe Test-bed Development
- Multiple development phases to maximize
scientific gain and engineering development along
the way. - Acute probes inserted in brain tissue for a
few hours - Initial validation of movable probe concept and
algorithms - Enable better short-term prosthetic feedback
experiments - Semi-chronic electrodes remain, motors
removed - Understand biophysical issues of chronic probe
operation - Track neural populations over days for plasticity
studies - Will set spec.s for future MEMS devices
- Chronic movable system permanently implanted
- Ultimate goal needs MEMS development
- Key technology for future neural-prosthetics
12Acute Test-Beds
- Last time motorizing the CCMD, a pre-existing
manual 4 probe device - Completed, with lessons learned
- (need to list some lessons here)
Put diagram of Thomas system here a few words
about status
13Semi-Chronic Test-bed
- Phase I(a) two motor drive that fits inside head
cap - Motors and electrodes stay inserted for a few
days - Power, control, data wires attached at start of
each session - Useful for studies in learning and plasticity
- Phase I(b) two motor drive that fits inside head
cap - motors detached at end of every
sessionelectrodes stay implanted for long
periods of time. - enables testing of long term biophysical impact
of chronic electrode operation (inflammation,
gliosis, etc.) - Phase II 12-16 motor micro-drive with removable
motor assembly. Will enable consistent
recordings of many cells
14Phase 1 Design Progress
Pretty Picture
Pretty Picture
15 Conclusions
- Developed theory for control of movable probe
based on peak-to-peak amplitude. Future
investigations will include - other wave form features, such as phase, shape,
frequency, etc. - event detection algorithms to handle
irregularity of spike trains - the effects of multiple units (inclusion of
spike sorting). - effects of tissue dimpling and relaxation
(easily incorporated) - Movable Probe Test-Beds development program
started - CCMD motorization completed, with lessons
learned. - 5-probe acute system developed
- Phase I of semi-chronic system largely designed