Title: Challenges and Opportunities for M2M
1DOCUMENT GSC15-PLEN-57
FOR Presentation for Information
SOURCE CCSA (Huawei Technologies)
AGENDA ITEM 6.12
CONTACT(S) Dr. Zhong Luo
Challenges and Opportunities for M2M
Dr. LUO Zhong (Noah) Deputy Director of
Department of Industry Standards Huawei
Technology Co., LTD
Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) GSC-15
2An Emerging Market
- M2M (Machine to Machine) is defined as data
communications between entities that do not
necessarily involve direct human interaction.
Also known as MTC (Machine-Type Communication)
within 3GPP, USN (Ubiquitous Sensor Networks) in
ITU-T, or as the Internet of Things. - Corresponding improvements to network
implementations supporting these solutions are
required. - Applications utilizing M2M are considered as
critical to Smart Grid capabilities and energy
efficiency.
3New Opportunities Identified
- M2M is returning to the forefront as an
application for service providers. - Drivers are both market-based and regulatory
- M2M holds the promise of bringing benefit to both
telecom operators and vendors - The opportunity may be a blue ocean for service
providers... because low-bandwidth M2M services
can be readily overlaid onto the current user
services network. - Vendors are expecting to profit from selling both
M2M-capable devices, and from the network
expansion brought about by increased throughput.
4Some Highlights on M2M Standards
CCSA TC10 - new Technical Committee set up in
early 2010, focusing on Ubiquitous Network
standardization.
5M2M standards in CCSA (1)
- TC10 is the leading Technical Committee in CCSA
focusing on Ubiquitous Network (UN)
standardization in China. Its intended to
provide high-quality telecom standards to support
the applications of M2M in different industries. - This new TC was set up in February 2010. More
than 200 delegates from all kinds of companies
attended the first TC10 meeting in Beijing,
including many potential industry users of the UN
specifications.
6M2M standards in CCSA (2)
- 4 Working Groups are set under TC10 and more than
20 technical specifications are expected to come
out at the end of year 2011 - WG1 Design, Architecture Common Requirements
- WG2 Requirements from Industry Applications
- WG3 Network Improvement to Support the
Applications - WG4 Extension between Telecom Networks and
Sensor Networks - Close collaboration between TC10 and existing TCs
in CCSA - a couple of joint research/standards
projects between TC10 and the following TCs - TC1 WG2
- TC3 WG4
- TC5 WG3, 4, 7, 8, 9
- TC8 WG2
7Current Issues
- Industries without an embedded communication
infrastructure tend to favor a Service
Provider-centric solution. Service Providers
provide them with application platforms, custom
or standardized devices, and the data
transmission pipe. - Infrastructure industries such as electricity,
petrol and railway, already have dedicated
communication networks. It is possible for them
to build M2M systems independent of the Service
Providers networks.
- Mobile Operators interest in deploying M2M
applications immediately on 3G or LTE network is
low. - Because of the competitive price position of 2G
devices, and low aggregate M2M traffic, operators
appear willing to deploy M2M initially on
existing 2G infrastructures.
- Most SDOs take small steady steps towards new
specifications, rather than rushing into new
standards. - Operators have not yet seen sizeable revenues
from M2M , and so are cautious about investment
in network capacity and/or capabilities to
support it.
8Challenges to Telecom Industry
- Business model and value chain
- Some carriers already have M2M applications in
their networks. However, charging models still
tend to be unsophisticated per meter per month
or total Bytes transmitted impeding revenue
opportunities. - There are questions regarding the role of
operators in the value chain. Most service
providers do not expect significant revenue in
the short-term. - Problems remain in optimization of the network
for M2M specific service. - Device Price vs. Economies of Scale
- There is a chicken or egg dilemma between the
ability to drive down device/chipset costs and
the need to deploy in vast quantities.
9Next Steps for M2M
- Service Providers need to reduce the overall cost
brought by introducing M2M business - Avoid network CAPEX only for the sake of M2M
- Drive cost reductions in M2M terminal devices
- Network resource consumption for M2M terminals is
different from existing voice/data devices, so
optimization is needed to reduce the overall cost
of the operators - Minimize the impact on the existing
conversational/interactive services, currently
the main profit source for service providers - Charging models need to be refined, and
potentially based on pre-subscribed
features/capabilities, rather than connection
time (MoU) or data volume (bytes) - Competition with non-Telecom service and
application providers will increase, so quick
movement into the market is essential.