Title: Growth Theories
1Growth Theories
Lecture 1 of Eco 317
J.D. Han at Kings
2- General Neo-Classcial Model
-
- Harrod-Domar Model
-
- Solow Model
- Endogenous Growth Model
- Human Capital
- Others
- Lewis Model
- Rostow Model
3Neo-Classical Economics
- Microeconomics that you have learned
- Aggregate Demand does not matter for long-run
growth of income - Macroeconomic Policies of Government (controlling
Money Supply, Government Expenditures )do not
matter for Y in the long-run You cannot pull
yourself up by your own bootstrap
41. Neo-classical Mode Supply Side Economics
- Economic growth
- Growth of Income
- Growth of aggregate output comes from
- an increase in labour L
- an increas in capital K and/or
- improvement of technology T
5In General
- production function
- Y f (K, L T)
- Growth function
- dY f (dK, dL dT)
6Specific Formula of Production Function
- Most Widely Used Production Fn is
- Cobb-Douglas Production Function
- Y A K a L 1-a
- , and alt1
- Realistic and Convenient Features of C-D
function - Diminishing Marginal Return
- Constant Return to Scale
7Why are the two features realistic in Economics?
- Diminishing Marginal Returns(DMR)
-
- eg) Y F(K,L ) 10 F(5, 5) 13 F(10,
5) -
- Decreasing Marginal Productivity of Capital or
Labor - dY/dK MPk, d MPk/ dk lt0 or dY2/d2K lt0
- dY/dL MPL, d MPL / dL lt0
- Constant Return to Scale (CRS)
- If Y F (K, L) is true, Y F (2K, 2L) 2 F (K,
L) is attainable. - You do not have to take DRS 1.5 Y F (2K, 2L)
8Diminishing Marginal Returns as a Fact of Life
- Biological growth- S curve(upper part)
- Stages of Acceleration (Youth) and
Deceleration (Maturity) -
- Convergence
- Production Function
- Stages of Increasing Marginal Return and
Decreasing Marginal Return - inflection point between IMR and DMR
- Why is IMR no substantive issue?
- Returns to Education/Efforts
92. Harrod-Domar Model
- Income Growth Rate Saving Rate x Efficiency of
Capital - dY/Y S/Y x dY/dK
- ( as S I dK )
-
- Saving Ratio x Marginal Product of Capital
-
102. Harrod-Domar Model
- Income Growth Rate Saving Rate x Efficiency of
Capital - dY/Y dY/dK x dK/Y
- ( as S I dK )
- dY/dK x S/Y
-
- Marginal Product(ivity) of Capital x Savings
Ratio -
11- S/Y
- dK/dY
-
- Average Propensity to Save
- Incremetal Capital Output Requirement
12- In general, eventually, the more amount of
capital, the Marginal Productivity of capital
decreases Convergence - Recall In the latter part of the S curve, the
MP of capital is a decreasing function of capital
Decreasing Marginal Returns or Law of
Diminishing Marginal Return - This happens as the size of capital grows in
the natural course of economic growth. - It is a formidable task to keep the weighted
average Marginal Product of Capital constant or
even Increasing for the entire economy.
13Implications of the H-D model
- -The key to economic growth is to expand the
level of investment capital accumulation or
Mobilization of capital -
- -Equally important is the productivity of
capital the higher the marginal product(ivity)
of capital, the better, or the lower the required
incremental capital-output ratio, the better.
14Limitation of the Harrod-Domar Model
- difficult to stimulate the level of domestic
savings particularly in the case of developing
countries - One way of supplementing the low domestic savings
would be foreign savings/investment - However, borrowing from overseas causes debt
repayment problems later. - The law of diminishing returns would suggest that
as investment increases the marginal productivity
of the capital will diminish, and the capital to
output ratio rise. Fighting this natural law is a
formidable task. - In a word, the model does not give any easy
recipe for a success of economic development
while it can explain the surface of the given
economic growth.
15How to enhance Efficiency of CapitalHigher MP
of Capital, or lower ICOR
- 1) Through Technological advances or Technical
innovations - This can happen to any economic system
Market(economy) can take care of this while
government may promote it too. - 2) Though resource allocation by visible hands,
government, channeling capital into efficient
areas - - A specific Economic System/Institution
- key words) Centrally planned economy Economic
Planning Resource Allocation Planning
Industrial Policy Promotion of National
Strategic Industries Key Industry
16 Technical Innovation
- Illusive
- Difficult to measure
- Hard to explain causes and impacts
- - Refer to Growth Accounting later.
17To spark Growth, we may need Institutions
- Institution (as opposed to Market Economy)
- covers Government Economic System Value
System(ethics,religion) - - Mechanism to Mobilize Capital? How to
increase Saving Rate? - - Mechanism to raise the Efficiency of Capital?
18 East Asian Governments Role for Promotion of
Economic Growth
- Government Policies are needed to 1)
encourage/force savings -
- 2)and/or to enhance efficiency of capital by
allocating scarce capital primarily to strategic
area of industry.
19 Case Studies of Governments Forced Savings and
Resource Allocation
- Successes
- -Japan
- by Kozo Yamamuras paper reports that during
the take-off stage of economic growth of Japan,
the capital output ratio fell significantly due
to Innovations(?) and Governments Industrial
Policy - -Korea
- Promotion of chae-bol(s)
- Strategic industries of Ship-building, Cars,
Semi-conductors, IT Industries, etc.
20- 2) Debacles
- Some countries have succeeded in mobilization of
capital, but failed in the efficient use of
capital. - Stalinist Economy
- North Korea
- Great Leap Movement in China
213. Solow Model
224. Lewis ModelDual Sector Model of Economic
Growth
- many LDCs had dual economies with a traditional
agricultural sector and a modern industrial
sector - Traditional Sector has too much labor at
subsistence level - MPlabour 0 Y C S T C I G
- Modern Sector absorbs labor and becomes the
source of economic surplus or savings
23How does the Mechanism work?
- The lack of development was due to a lack of
savings and investment. The key to development
was to increase savings and investment. - Lewis saw the existence of the modern industrial
sector as essential if this was to happen. A
growing industrial sector requiring labour
provided the incomes that could be spent and
saved. This would in itself generate demand and
also provide funds for investment. Income
generated by the industrial sector was trickling
down throughout the economy. - Urban migration from the poor rural areas to the
relatively richer industrial urban areas gave
workers the opportunities to earn higher incomes
and crucially save more providing funds for
entrepreneurs to investment.
24Policy Implications of Lewis model
- Induced Displacement of Population from Rural to
Urban Sector - Government may use push and pull factors using
Institutions or System -
- -Vanity Effect as a magnet Glamorous/modernize
d Urban Sector versus Backward/Suppressed
Rural Area - -Income Inequality is as a magnet
25Lewis Model is Unbalanced Economic Growth
Strategy(??????????)
- This is a practical strategy.
- Lets reflect on side-effect/problems
- -Sustainability in the long-run Ravaging impacts
of labor saving technology How much and how
long is the modern sector absorb the surplus
labor? What will happen to no-longer-needed
surplus labor? - -Inequality between agricultural industrial
sectors - Income Inequality Urbanization issues
- Urban/Modern Sector may not Save but Spend Urban
Consumerism - Rural-Urban Migration is larger than what the
urban sector can absorb Rural Poverty simply
becomes Urban Poverty
26Case Studies Casual Analysis
- England in 18th Century
- Enclosure Movement
- U.S. in 19th century
- Slave-Emancipation
- Japan
- Korea in the 1970s and the 1980s
- New Village Movement (Sae-Ma-Eul-Un-Dong)
- Taiwan (part of China)
- China
27Quantitative AnalysisIncome (Distribution)
Inequality and Economic Growth
- Income Inequality is measured by Gini-Coefficient
- Some international comparisons argue as economy
grows, Gini Coefficient generally rises first and
then fall - It is in line with Lewis theory Income
inequality is not only inevitable, but also
necessary for economic growth - - Case studies of Korea, Japan, and China
(presentation)
285. Rostow's Model- the Stages of Economic
Development.
- In 1960, the American Economic Historian, WW
Rostow suggested that countries passed through
five stages of economic development
29- Stage 1 Traditional Society-dominated by
subsistence (defined as no economic surplus,
meaning output being consumed by producers rather
than traded) - -trade being carried out by barter, meaning
goods being exchanged directly for other goods - -Agriculture being the most important
industryProduction being labor intensive using
only limited quantities of capital. - Stage 2 Transitional Stage (the preconditions for
takeoff)-Increased specialization starting to
generate surpluses for trading. - -an emergence of a transport infrastructure to
support trade External trade also occurs
concentrating on primary products Entrepreneurs
emerge - -savings and investment grow.
- Stage 3 Take Off-Rapid Industrialization or
Industrial Revolution - - Growth concentrated in a few regions of the
country and in one or two manufacturing
industries. - - The level of investment reaches over 10 of
GNP. - - The economic transitions are accompanied by
the evolution of new political and social
institutions that support the industrialization. - - The growth is self-sustaining investment
leads to increasing incomes in turn generating
more savings to finance further investment. - Stage 4 Drive to Maturity-Industrial
Diversification producing a wide range of goods
and services reliance on exports and imports may
start decreasing - Stage 5 High Mass Consumption- Mass
Consumption(????) Domestic Aggregate Demand is
the major determinant of Business (Cycles) - - Consumer durable industries Service
sector
30- Limitations
- Deterministic Path for All?
- Rostow predict that every economy is going
through the same stage. - However, some economies are stuck in the first
stage forever while other economies take off. - -leaving a room for cultural explanation
- It does not set down the detailed nature of the
pre-conditions for growth What sparks the
take-off? - -Exogenous Shocks as a Catalyst for Great
Transformation? - It is not very helpful as a policy prescription.
Perhaps its main use is to highlight the need for
investment. - Explaining the fast is always easier than
Predicting - the future
31Major Contribution of Rostow Model
- Emphasis of Take-Off
- -Economic Development is
- not a continuous process
- -There should be
- some Event for Great Transformation.
32Case Studies Catalyst for Take off
- Catalysis for Take Off Exogenous Shocks
- Japan
- Meiji Revolution Korean War
- Korea
- President Park, Jeong Hee Vietnam War
- China
- Deng Xiao Pings Reform
- Jiang Ze Mins Southern Journey(Nan Xun)
- Iraq War?
336. Endogenous Growth Theory
- Excellent Summary of Endogenous Growth Models
- http//www.ncl.ac.uk/ncihe/r8_117.htm
34Value System as a Foundation Institution for
Economic Growth
- Max Weber arguned that
- Protestant Work Ethic sanctioned hard work,
frugality and wise investment. - Rodney Stark is one of the most highly regarded
sociology of religion scholars alive today. He
recently published The Victory of Reason How
Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and
Western Success. - Professor Tu Wei-Ming at Harvard University said
that Neo-Confucianism of the Far East is similar
to protestant ethic. - - refer to the essence of his idea