PhD Student : Fabiana Sacchetti - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

PhD Student : Fabiana Sacchetti

Description:

Party System Institutionalization in Post-Communist Countries: Trends and Interpretations PhD Student : Fabiana Sacchetti Course of Comparative Politics (Prof ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: fabianas1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PhD Student : Fabiana Sacchetti


1
Party System Institutionalization in
Post-Communist Countries Trends and
Interpretations
  • PhD Student Fabiana Sacchetti
  • Course of Comparative Politics (Prof. Luciano
    Bardi)
  • PhD Program in Political Systems and
    Institutional Change XXIII Cycle
  • A.Y. 2008/09
  • IMT Institute for Advanced Studies, Lucca

2
Institutionalization of Party System(Mainwaring
S. 1998 Party Systems in the Third Wave)
  • Institutionalization (Huntington, 1996)
  • Process by which an organization or a procedure
    acquires value and stability, becoming well
    established and widely known
  • Institutionalization of Party Systems 4
    Dimensions
  • Stability (regularity in patterns of party
    competition)
  • Rootedness in society (strenght of ties between
    parties and citizens)
  • Legitimacy (extent to which political actors
    believe in parties as fundamental)
  • Relevance of Party Organization

3
Are Post-communist Countries Institutionalizing
a Competitive Party System?
  • Two Different Theoretical Perspectives
  • The Tabula Rasa Approach
  • Newness of post-communist democratization
  • Weak, Incohate and Fluid Party Systems
  • Mair (1997) Rose (1995) Klingemann (1992)
  • The Structure Approach
  • Established and Competitive Party Systems and
    Strong Constituencies
  • Path Dependency Theories and Studies / Surveys on
    Voters Behavior and Party Identification
  • Lewis (1994) Kitschelt (1995) Miller (2000)
    Fish (1995)

4
Empirical Evidence
  • Very mixed it can confirm either one or the
    other approach
  • Single-case studies
  • Cross-Country studies

5
Mair P.(1997) Party System Change Approaches
and Interpretations
  • Party System the system of interactions
    resulting from inter-party competition
  • (Sartori, 1976)
  • Party System Change when a party system is
    transformed from one type of party system into
    another

6
Mair P.(1997) Party System Change Approaches
and Interpretations
  • Peculiarities of Postcommunist Party Systems
  • Democratization Process
  • Absence of real civil society
  • Triple Transition
  • Establishing ex novo the principle of
    contestation
  • Rokkans Four Stages (Incorporation,
    Mobilization, Activation, Politization) are
    traversed prior to the emergence of new party
    system
  • Mass Politics already exists

7
Mair P.(1997) Party System Change Approaches
and Interpretations
  • Electorate and Parties
  • Electorate is open, volatile, uncertain, not yet
    fully participant
  • Relative lack of crystallization of identities
  • Elitist Parties (Top-down, Internally created)
  • No challenge from Mass Parties
  • Difficulties of gaining large membership can be
    offset by media access and state subsidies

8
Mair P.(1997) Party System Change Approaches
and Interpretations
  • Context of Competition
  • Unstable Organizational Structures (unstable
    pattern of organizational behavior, party
    splitting and merging, continued fragmentation,
    no clear boundaries between parties and interest
    groups or social movements)
  • Unstable Institutional Environment
  • Open Structures of Competition ? Lack of
    Systemness (more Set of Parties than Party
    Systems, Atomized Pluralism)

9
Mair P.(1997) Party System Change Approaches
and Interpretations
  • Pattern of Competition
  • Culture of Political Uncertainty ? Competition
    prevails
  • What is at stake in the competition is very high
  • (i.e constitution-building)
  • Conclusions
  • Unstability of Post-Communist Party Systems
    could be just a question of time, but structural
    variables make institutionalization highly
    problematic

10
Bielasiak J. (2002) Institutionalization of
Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist
States
  • Institutionalization of Electoral Reforms
  • Clear trend toward Proportional Representation
  • Early Stabilization
  • Basic changes in electoral formulas took place
    early (between the breakdown elections and the
    founding elections) and have been largely absent
    later on
  • Subsequent reforms concerned more secific
    components of electoral regulations (District
    Magnitude, Assembly Size, Legal Tresholds)

11
Bielasiak J. (2002) Institutionalization of
Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist
States
  • Voting Patterns
  • Electoral Volatility (Pedersen Index) very high
    (Av. 28)
  • WE 11.4 SE 16.3 LA 28.1
  • ECE 20.5 SEE 20.3 BS 31.4 FSU 41.9
  • Little change over time
  • Main reason is the swing between incumbent and
    opposition parties, as a mean to register
    dissatisfaction with government policies
  • Electorate is able to identify party positions on
    basic issues, but theres little attachement to
    specific parties and ideologies

12
Bielasiak J. (2002) Institutionalization of
Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist
States
  • Effective Number of Electoral Parties
  • Very large ENEP Multipartitism or Extreme
    Pluralism
  • WE 3.7 SE 3.5 LA 4.2
  • ECE 6.4 SEE 4.3 BS 6.7 FSU 6.6
  • Proliferation of new parties (exc. Albania,
    Bulgaria)
  • Variation over time Former Bloc decline, FSU
    oscillation
  • Pedersen positive correlation between High
    Volatility and Large ENEP
  • Conclusions
  • Institutionalised Electoral Systems but not yet
    fully Institutionalised Party Systems (party
    fragmentation and electoral fluidity)

13
Meleshevich A. (2004) Political
Institutionalization of Party Systems in
Post-Soviet Countries
  • Political Institutionalization of a Party System
  • Two Dimensions
  • Autonomy (external dimension)
  • degree to which parties and party systems
    fulfill their functions and act autonomously from
    other social institutions capacity to have an
    even support across the country and not simply
    express interests of a particular social group
  • Stability (internal dimension)
  • degree of regularity in the patterns of
    interaction between its elements

14
Meleshevich A. (2004) Political
Institutionalization of Party Systems in
Post-Soviet Countries
  • Autonomy
  • a) Percentage of seats held by independents and
    num. of candidates in electoral lists without
    previous political career
  • b) Role of parties in cabinet formation
  • c) Strenght and uniformity of party
    identification among regions
  • Stability
  • a) Percentage of vote share in an election taken
    by paries that partecipated in any previous
    election (old parties volatility index)
  • b) Pedersen Index of Electoral Volatility

15
Birch S.(2001) Electoral Systems and Party
System Stability in Postcommunist Europe
  • Inter-electoral Volatility multidimensional
    concept
  • (1) changes in party support from individual
    voters
  • (2) changes in composition of the electorate
  • (3) changes in the range of parties (mergers,
    splits, party foundations, etc)
  • Party Replacement measures the turnover of
    parties, the degree of penetration of new players
    in to the party system (sum of the vote shares
    won by parties at t1 that had not contested at
    t)

16
Birch S.(2001) Electoral Systems and Party
System Stability in Postcommunist Europe
  • Comparison between these two indicators
  • Inter-electoral Volatility (very high levels)
  • Party Replacement (very high levels)
  • Basic preferences of electorates have remained
    stable most of the change is due to elite-level
    fluidity
  • Most party systems in Post-Comm. Europe are
    uncoupled or floating, responding more to élite
    changes in configurations of alliances than to
    shifts in electoral base
  • Not lack of sistemacity in political competition,
    but simply a different kind of competition

17
Miller et al. (2000) Emerging Party Systems in
Post-Soviet Societies Fact or Fiction?
  • High levels of 3 Indicators in Post-Soviet
    Countries
  • 1) Partisan Identification of voters
  • 2) Consistency between identification and voting
  • 3) Correpondence between policy preferences of
    national élites and their voters
  • Popular support for parties in post communist
    countries doesnt reflect deep seated social
    cleavages it arises from information and
    knowledge regarding policy orientations rather
    than from socialization
  • Post-soviet party systems are beginning to
    provide a real means of representation and
    communication between masses and élites

18
Bibliography
  • Bardi L. and Mair P. The Parameters of Party
    Systems
  • (Party Politics, Vol. 12 No.2, 2008)
  • Bielasiak J. The Institutionalization of
    Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist
    States
  • (Comparative Politics, Vol. 34 No.2, Jan 2002)
  • Birch S. Electoral Systems and Party System
    Stability in Post Communist Europe
  • (Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of
    the American Political Science Association, Aug
    2001)
  • Mainwaring S. Democratization in the Third Wave
  • (Journal of Democracy, Vol. 9 No.3, 1998)

19
Bibliography
  • Mair P. Party System Change Approaches and
    Interpretations
  • (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997)
  • Meleshevich A. and Lockman C. Political
    Institutionalization of Party Systems in
    Post-Soviet Transitions
  • (Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
    Midwest Political Science Association, Apr 2004)
  • Miller A.H. and others Emerging Party Systems in
    Post-Soviet Societies Fact or Fiction?
  • (The Journal of Politics, Vol. 62 No.2, May
    2000)
  • Sartori G. Parties and Party Systems
  • (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976)

20
Useful Additional Bibliography
  • Bielasiak J. Party competition in emerging
    democracies representation and effectiveness in
    post-communism and beyond (Democratization
    Vol.12 No.3, 2005)
  • Fish M.S. Democracy Begin to Emerge (Current
    History, 1995)
  • Fish M.S. The Advent of Multipartitism in
    Russia, 1993-95 (Post-Soviet Affair, Vol 11 N.4,
    1995)
  • Huntington S.P. Political Order in Changing
    Societies (Yale University Press, New Heaven,
    1998)

21
Useful Additional Bibliography
  • Kitschelt H. Formation of Party Systems in East
    Central Europe (Politics and Society, Vol.20
    No.1, 1992)
  • Kitschelt H. Formation of Party Cleavages in
    Post-communist Democracies Teheoretical
    Proposition (Party Politics, Vol.1 N.4, 1995)
  • Kitschelt H., Mansfeldova Z., et al. Post-
    Communist party Systems (Cambridge University
    Press, Cambridge, 1999)
  • Klingemann H.D. And Wettenberg M. Decaying vs
    Developing Party Systems (British Journal of
    Political Science, Vol.22, 1992)

22
Useful Additional Bibliography
  • Lewis P. Democratization and Party Development
    in Eastern Europe (Democratization, Vol.1 No.3,
    1994)
  • Linz J.J. And Stepan A. Problems of Democratic
    Transition and Consolidation Southern Europe,
    South America and Post-Communist Europe (John
    Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996)
  • Lipset S.M. and Rokkan S. Party Systems and
    Voters Alignement Cross National Perspectives
    (Free Press, New York, 1967)
  • Rose R, and Munro N. Elections and Parties in
    New Democracies (CQ Press, Washington, 2003)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com