PSYC 1037: Research Skills II Dr Pam Blundell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

PSYC 1037: Research Skills II Dr Pam Blundell

Description:

PSYC 1037: Research Skills II Dr Pam Blundell Lecture Two: Relationships Outline Objectives Answers to last weeks worksheet Covariance and Correlation Theory Practice ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: psc54
Category:
Tags: psyc | blundell | pam | research | skills | spss

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PSYC 1037: Research Skills II Dr Pam Blundell


1
PSYC 1037 Research Skills IIDr Pam Blundell
  • Lecture Two Relationships

2
Outline
  • Objectives
  • Answers to last weeks worksheet
  • Covariance and Correlation
  • Theory
  • Practice

3
Objectives
  • At the end of this lecture you should
  • Know how to interpret scatterplots
  • Understand the concepts of covariance and
    correlation
  • Be able to calculate Covariance
  • Be able to calculate various Correlation
    coefficients

4
Worksheet
  • A priori power
  • Assuming a0.05, power of 0.9 gives us a d3.25
  • So we need 59 people per group
  • So 118 subjects!

5
Worksheet
  • Post hoc power
  • We have a medium effect size
  • d is less than 1, so power is less than 0.17
    17 chance of detecting a difference that is
    really there!

6
Reading
  • Howitt Cramer
  • Stats book Chapters 6 7, 10
  • SPSS book Chapter 7
  • Field Chapter 4

7
Correlational method
  • Measures two or more characteristics of the same
    individual and computes the relationship between
    those characteristics
  • Studies variance among organisms rather than
    variance among treatments

8
Relationships
  • Do variables co-vary?
  • Change in one variable results in change in
    another variable
  • We can look at scattergrams and make observations
  • We need an objective way of calculating the
    correlation

9
Research questions
  • Is there a relationship between IQ and A Level
    points?
  • Is there a relationship between IQ and height?
  • Is there a relationship between IQ and the number
    of children you have?

10
Plotting relationshipsThe Scattergram
11
The Scattergram
  • Each point on the scattergram represents a single
    individual
  • Each axis is a different variable

12
Scattergrams
  • Enable us to look at a glance and see if there
    are any outliers
  • Can show relationships

13
Positive relationship
14
Negative relationship
15
No relationship
16
Covariance
  • Scattergram illustrates the relationship
    qualitatively
  • Need to quantify that relationship how do the
    variable co-vary.

17
Variance
18
Covariance
  • There is an error in this formula in Howitt
    Cramer (p62)

19
Co-variance
  • To calculate how two variables co-vary we
  • Calculate the difference between each data point
    and the mean
  • Calculate the cross-product value for each data
    point
  • Add these up, and divide by N-1

20
  • If we plot the means on the graph, we can
    graphically see what the Covariance is!

21
  • and is given by
    the distance between each point and the mean
  • You can see that with this positive correlation,
    the data points nearly all lie in two quadrants
    of the scattergram

22
-

-
  • If we multiply the X-value by the Y-value all
    the points on a positive correlation fall in the
    positive sections of the scattergram. If we
    added up these values, wed get a large positive
    value.

23
Worked example
IQ A level points
101 20
113 25
108 24
119 30
99 21
96 18
24
Scattergram
25
IQ A level points
101 20 -5 -3 15
113 25 7 2 14
108 24 2 1 2
119 30 13 7 91
99 21 -7 -2 14
96 18 -10 -5 50
106 23 186
Means
Hence Co-variance 186/5 37.2
26
Covariance
  • Is not a standardised measure
  • The value will depend upon the units used
  • Doesnt allow us to compare the magnitude of the
    covariance between different things
  • Therefore, we need to standardise the covariance

27
Correlation coefficient
  • The Pearson product-moment correlation
    coefficient
  • -1 r 1

28
IQ A level points
101 20 -5 -3 15
113 25 7 2 14
108 24 2 1 2
119 30 13 7 91
99 21 -7 -2 14
96 18 -10 -5 50
106 (8.9) 23 (4.3) 186
Hence Correlation r 37.2 / (8.9 x 4.3) 0.97
29
Correlation
  • r varies between -1 and 1
  • Can work out probability values(or SPSS tells us)

30
Warning
  • Correlations tells us about LINEAR relationships

31
Recap
  • Scattergrams
  • Covariance
  • Correlation

32
Do you want a break?
  • Correlations in SPSS
  • Biserial point correlations
  • Non-parametric correlations

33
Correlation in SPSS
  • Enter the data into SPSS one variable in each
    column

34
Correlation in SPSS
  • Analyze ? Correlate? Bivariate

35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
SPSS Output
38
Scattergrams in SPSS
  • Graphs ? Scatter

39
  • Simple - when you have two variables
  • Overlay - examine the effects of two or more
    variables on another variable
  • Matrix - examine the relationship between all
    combinations of many different pairs of variables

40
  • Set the variables for the X-axis and the Y-axis

41
Scattergrams in SPSS
42
Exam performance and anxiety
  • SPSS demonstration -- File ExamAnx.sav
  • First, examine the data using Scattergram
  • Y-Axis (the DV) performance ( of mark)
  • X-Axis (the IV) exam anxiety (/100)
  • Set Markers by relationship between the
    variables for different groups (e.g. gender)
  • Overlay Scattergram, to compare effects of
    revision and anxiety on exam performance
  • Now carry-out statistical test
  • Analyse gt Correlation gt Bivariate

43
Interpreting the output
  • What does the diagonal represent?
  • How are anxiety and revision time each related to
    exam performance?
  • 1. Anxiety and performance, (r -.441, plt.001)
  • 2. Revising and performance, (r .397, plt.001)
  • 3. Anxiety and Revising, (r -.709, plt.001)
  • What do 1, 2, and 3 mean?
  • So can we say that anxiety causes poor
    performance?

44
Causality
  • Correlation does not infer causality
  • Correlation can be caused by a third variable
    that we have not measured
  • Correlation tells us nothing about the
    directionality of a relationship
  • We have not manipulated any variables there is
    no independent variable

45
R2
  • R2 (Co-efficient of determination) tells you the
    amount of variability in one variable that is
    explained by the others
  • How much variability in performance is explained
    by anxiety?
  • (-.441)² 0.194 - multiply by 100 19.4
  • 19.4 of the variance in performance is accounted
    by anxiety! 80.6 remains to be accounted by
    other variables!
  • What about revision time?

46
Correlation Summary
  • Pearsons correlation coefficient (R)
  • Requires parametric data
  • Is extremely robust

47
Non-parametric data
  • There are other tests available to deal with
    non-parametric data
  • Spearmans Rho
  • Kendalls Tau
  • Point-biserial correlations

48
Spearmans Rho
  • Use when there are violations of parametric
    assumptions/and or ordinal data (e.g. grades,
    first, upper second, second, third, and pass)

49
Spearmans Rho
  • First, rank the data!
  • How do we rank a set of measurements/data

50
Spearmans Rho
  • Now, use the ranks instead of the raw numbers,
    in the same calculation as Pearsons.
  • Example Is facial attractiveness associated
    with ratings of success?

51
Rank the data
Face Attractive Attract_Rank Success Success_rank
1 3 3.5 2 2
2 2 1.5 2 2
3 5 6 4 7
4 2 1.5 3 4.5
5 6 7.5 4 7
6 4 5 4 7
7 3 3.5 2 2
8 6 7.5 3 4.5
52
attract success
3.5 2.0 -1.0 -2.5 2.50
1.5 2.0 -3.0 -2.5 7.50
6.0 7.0 1.5 2.5 3.75
1.5 4.5 -3.0 0 0.00
7.5 7.0 3.0 2.5 7.50
5.0 7.0 .5 2.5 1.25
3.5 2.0 -1.0 -2.5 2.50
7.5 4.5 3.0 0 0
4.5 (2.2) 4.5 (2.5) 25.00
Hence Correlation r 25/ (8-1) x (2.2 x 2.5)
0.65
53
Spearmans Rho in SPSS
  • Similar to Pearsons
  • CorrelateBivariate
  • Make sure Spearmans Rho box is ticked

54
Kendalls Tau
  • Use when we have a smaller data set with a large
    number of tied ranks, i.e., if lots of scores
    have the same rank
  • More sensitive than Spearmans Rho
  • Used more often because in reality we are more
    likely to have a large number of tied ranks!
  • See SPSS

55
Point Biserial correlation
  • When one of the variables is a dichotomous
    variable (categorical with only two categories)
  • pregnant woman
  • dead or alive
  • male or female
  • DONT use when there is really a continuum
    underlying the category (e.g. Pass/Fail).

56
Point Biserial correlation
  • Calculation simple same as Pearsons!
  • Example The relationship between time spent away
    and gender of cats (file pbcorr.sav)
  • code sexuality (0female, 1male)
  • time (mins away)
  • Carry out Pearsons correlation

57
  • What about the sign of the correlation?
  • Ignore the sign - depends on your coding!
  • How much of the variance in time spent chatting
    up is accounted by sexuality?
  • R² (.378) ² .143, so 14.3 of the variance in
    time away from home is explained by gender.
  • Do Descriptives - Why?

58
Summary
59
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com