Title: David Ricardo
1David Ricardo
- Articulated and rigorously formulated Classical
economics - Personal friend of Malthus, although they
disagreed about much of economics - He did incorporate some of Malthus ideas
- Elected to Parliament in 1819
- Friend of John Stuart Mill
2Ricardos methodology
- Adam Smith relied on deductive analysis and
descriptive narratives - Ricardo also relied on deductive reasoning, but
more interested in analysis rather than
description - Interested in theory as a basis of policy
3Framework of Analysis
- What are the questions that David Ricardo is
asking? - What determines the distribution of income
between workers, landlords and capitalists? - What determines wages, rent and profit? More
specifically, what determines changes in relative
factor prices over time? - Or, what determines changes in the distribution
of income over time?
4Essence of Ricardos Model
- Per capita wages remain at subsistence level in
the long run because of wages fund doctrine - Landlords contribute nothing to the economy
they receive rent simply by holding land, which
was fixed in supply. They only consume, not save - The profits of capitalists are the only source of
investment (capital accumulation) - Over time, the distribution of income will favor
landlords, in part because of the ideas of Smith
in regard to the declining rate of profit
5Framework of Analysis
- What are Ricardos assumptions?
- Labor cost theory changes in relative prices
over time are explained by changes in labor cost
measured in hours - Neutral Money Changes in the money supply do
not cause changes in relative prices
6Framework of Analysis
- What are Ricardos assumptions?
- Fixed coefficients of production fixed
capital/labor ratio for each production process,
does not change as level of output changes - Constant returns to scale in manufacturing
horizontal supply curve, MC is constant
7Framework of Analysis
- What are Ricardos assumptions?
- Diminishing returns to scale in agriculture
upward sloping supply curve, MC increases - Full employment flexible wages ensure full
employment of labor via market forces
8Framework of Analysis
- What are Ricardos assumptions?
- Perfect competition
- Rational economic actors
- Malthusian population thesis
- Wages fund doctrine wage is equal to wages
fund/labor force
9Framework of Analysis
- What is the economic/ political/cultural/social
environment of Ricardo? - Rising grain prices, rising rent
- Growth of industrialization, decline of
agriculture - Landlords wanted restricted trade, capitalists
wanted free trade
10Framework of Analysis
- What is the role of the market?
- Ricardo advocated free markets, free
international trade, free movement of labor
11Framework of analysis
- What is the role of government?
- Limited role for government provide basic
infrastructure to aid in functioning of markets - Judicial system, roads, national defense
12Ricardos Theory of Rent
- Rent exists because of
- Diminishing returns in agriculture diminishing
returns begin immediately - Scarcity (fixed amount) of fertile land (like
Malthus)
13Ricardos Theory of Rent from the Product Side
- As more labor and capital are applied to a fixed
amount of land, the marginal product decreases.Â
This makes if profitable to bring less
productive land into production - But because a bushel of corn from less productive
land sells for the same price as a bushel from
highly productive land, tenant farmers are
willing to pay more to rent the highly productive
land. - Result the landowners, not the tenant farmers,
are the ones who gain from productive land.
14Ricardos Theory of Rent from the Cost Side
- As more labor and capital are applied to a piece
of land, the marginal cost of production
increases - Equilibrium condition Price marginal cost of
the last unit produced by the least efficient
(highest cost) producer
15Ricardos Theory of Rent Conclusions
- Rent is a payment to the landlord that equalizes
the rate of profits (profits earned by tenant
farmers) on land of differing fertilities - Rent is price-determined, not price-determining
- The high price of corn is not determined by high
rents - Rather, high rents are determined by high price
of corn BECAUSE - As the price of corn increases, more less fertile
land is brought into production
16Ricardos Theory of Value
- What do we mean by theory of value?
- We are talking about what determines prices. (or,
for Ricardo, relative prices) - To understand Ricardos value theory, first look
at what Smith had to say
17Smiths Value Theory
- According to Smith, in an undeveloped economy,
the exchange value (price) of a product depends
upon the quantity of labor embodied in each
Labor Theory of Value - How do we measure the quantity of labor?
- When Smith tried to answer this question, he
ended up with wages as a measure of quantity. - In a more advanced society, the value (price) of
a product is determined by the cost of production
Wages profit rent (Profit includes
interest). In the long run, with competition,
price cost. How does this compare with the
model of perfect competition that you studied in
principles of microeconomics? - This is the cost of production theory that your
textbook refers to on pages 126-127.
18Ricardos Theory of Value
- Ricardo did not like the cost of production
theory of value because it was used to argue FOR
the Corn Laws - Ricardo believed that tariffs would reduce
profits and reduce growth in the economy
19Ricardos Theory of Value
- Remember that Ricardo was interested in changes
in income distribution over time - So, with respect to value theory, he was
interested in changes in relative prices over time
20Ricardos Labor Theory of Value
- The value of a commodity, or the quantity of any
other commodity for which it will exchange,
depends on the relative quantity of labor which
is necessary for its production, and not on the
greater or less compensation (wages) which is
paid for that labor.
21How does Ricardo measure the quantity of labor?
- Time necessary to produce the product
- Basically, clock hours used in production
22How does Ricardo account for the fact that labor
skills vary?
- Labor is not homogeneous
- Wages will reflect differences in the skills of
labor, BUT the wage differentials will remain
constant over time (assumption) - Therefore, changes in relative prices of goods
will not be due to changes in wage differentials,
but due to changes in the quantity of labor used
to produce the product.
23How does Ricardo account for capital goods as a
factor influencing prices?
- Capital is stored up labor since labor is
required to product the capital good (e.g., a
machine). Therefore, the depreciation of capital
is simply equal to the amount of labor that was
used to produce that capital good. - For example, if a machine has 10 hours of labor
imbedded in it, and if it has a useful life of 5
years, then each year 2 units of labor will be
expended as machine is used up. Therefore,
capital is simply converted into units of labor.
24How does Ricardo account for land as a factor
influencing prices?
- To understand this, you have to go back to
Ricardos theory of rent. The amount of rent is
determined by the price of the output (e.g.,
wheat), and at the margin no rent is received on
land. Rent is determined by the price of the
product the price of the product is NOT
determined the amount of rent
25How does Ricardo account for profits as a factor
influencing prices?
- Obviously, different industries have different
rates of profit - These differences do affect prices
- However, in the long run the rate of profit will
equalize between industries. - Ricardo assumed that any profit differential in
the short run was not important enough to
influence relative prices. - AND REMEMBER that Ricardo wasnt really
interested in short term relative price
differences, he was concerned with changes in
relative prices over time.Â
26Ricardos Labor Theory of Value
- Although he may, at times, have seemed to
backpedal on his labor theory of value he did
feel that the quantity of labor was, by far, the
most important determinant of value (prices)
27Ricardos Distribution Theory
- Ricardo agreed with Smith regarding falling
profits over time, but he disagreed with Smiths
reasoning. - Remember that Smith believed that profits would
fall as a result of competition in the labor
market resulting in higher wages. Ricardo
pointed out that this is inconsistent with
Smiths cost of production theory of value, since
in Smiths theory, prices are determined by
wages, and so if wages rise, prices rise rather
than profits falling. - Ricardo argued that per capita wages would not
rise because of the Malthusian population theory,
that is, higher wages would result in an increase
in the size of the labor force - Ricardo rejected Smiths ideas of decreasing
commodity prices and a limited number of
investment opportunities by relying on Says
Law. Â
28So, why do profits fall over time?
- Three classes
- landowners (who spend their rental income on
luxuries) - workers (who spend their wage income on
necessities) - capitalists (who save most of their profit income
and reinvest it)
29So, why do profits fall over time? (contd)
- The size of profits is determined residually by
the extent of cultivation on land and the
historically-given real wage - When economy is young profits are high
- Wages will increase, and population grows
30So, why do profits fall over time? (contd)
- When population grows, food production must
increase - Less fertile land is brought into production
- Rents rise, profits in agriculture fall
- Why do profits overall fall?
31Is there anything that can forestall this
inevitable stationary state?
- Technological Progress
- International Trade
- Ricardo was against the Corn Laws because he
thought they would hasten the stationary state
because they gave more rents to landlords via
higher grain prices
32Ricardos Theory of International Trade
- Principle of Comparative Advantage
- NOT Smiths Absolute Advantage
- Based in differences in relative prices (costs of
production) between countries - Basis of two-way gains from trade
33Principle of Comparative Advantage
Output of Cloth per worker per day Output of pottery per worker per day
England 50 yds 150 plates
France 30 yds 120 plates
34Principle of Comparative Advantage (contd)
- In this case England has an absolute advantage in
both products. - You can be sure that France would NOT be happy to
find out that they should import both products
from England. - Ricardo focused on opportunity cost to determine
comparative advantage and a basis for two-way
trade.Â
35Principle of Comparative Advantage
- In England, 50 yards of cloth has an opportunity
cost of 150 plates, or, 1 yard of cloth costs 3
plates. - In France, 30 yards of cloth has an opportunity
cost of 120 plates, or 1 yard of cloth costs 4
plates. - Therefore, cloth is relatively cheaper in
England, so England has a comparative advantage
in cloth and should export cloth to France. - In England, 150 pieces of pottery costs 50 yards
of cloth, so 1 piece of pottery costs 1/3Â yard of
cloth. - In France, 120 pieces of pottery costs 30 yards
of cloth, so 1 piece of pottery costs ¼ yard of
cloth. - Therefore, pottery is relatively cheaper in
France, so France has a comparative advantage in
pottery and should export pottery to England in
exchange for cloth. - It can also be shown that both countries can gain
from this experience. In fact, when countries
specialize in products in which they have a
comparative advantage, world production increases.
36Ricardo and full employment
- Will a capitalist economy be stable and always at
a full employment level? - We can look at this from the perspective of
aggregate demand
37Perspectives on Aggregate Demand
- Some mercantilists discussed the concept of
insufficient aggregate demand - too much saving
causes spending to fall, which results in lower
production and unemployed resources.
38Perspectives on Aggregate Demand (contd)
- Adam Smiths perspective
- Landlords spent on luxury goods and were
parasites, workers did not have enough income to
save and invest. - BUT, when capitalists saved and invested, the
invested funds were channeled to the production
of capital goods, so that what is annually saved
is as regularly consumed as what is annually
spent, and nearly in the same time too but it is
consumed by a different set of people. - Therefore, there cannot be insufficient aggregate
demand.
39Perspectives on Aggregate Demand (contd)
- Malthus perspective
- Malthus believed that an economy could suffer
from insufficient aggregate demand. - While he did accept Smiths argument for the
short run, in the long run he believed that the
savings-investment process could not go on
forever. - Too much saving leads to more capital
accumulation than the economy can absorb. Saving
leads to lower consumption but higher investment,
which leads to the capacity to produce more
consumer goods in the future. - While supply theoretically creates its own demand
(potential demand), it may not be effective
demand. - The landlords who were parasites in Smiths world
may save the economy in Malthus world since they
will spend their income on consumer goods.
40Perspectives on Aggregate Demand (contd)
- Ricardos perspective
- Supply side economics.Â
- Production (output) creates income sufficient to
purchase all of the output. - This is a simplified version of Says Law (supply
creates its own demand)
41Ricardos Theory of Money
- He was a bullionist
- Believed in "commodity theory" or "metallic
theory" of money. - Money is simply gold, silver and other precious
metals. - The price of money is just like that of any other
commodity cost of production. - More explicitly, he regarded the long run value
of money to be equal to the costs of extracting
from mines the precious metals that either
constituted commodity money (coins) or the gold
that underlay convertible paper money. - Fiat money, where notes are neither a commodity
nor convertible to it, remain outside the scope
of his theory. - "Gold and silver, like all other commodities, are
valuable only in proportion to the quantity of
labour necessary to produce them and bring them
to market...The quantity of money that can be
employed in a country must be depend on its
value...Though paper money has no intrinsic
value, yet, by limiting its quantity, its value
in exchange is as great as an equal denomination
of coin, or of bullion in that coin."
42Ricardos Theory of Money (continued)
- Believed that paper money should be convertible
into gold - Restricts governments power to create money
- Thus reducing inflationary pressures
- But remember, money is neutral with respect to
changes in relative prices