Title: The Founding
1The Founding
2Why Study History in a Political Science Class?
- U.S. government has old structure
- Legacy need to know "why it was" to understand
"what it is" - Vestiges constraints posed by "outdated"
structure - Political uses of history History shows
that. - Account of founding can confer legitimacy
- On government in general
- On particular policies pursued by government
- Debate over framers intentions part of
contemporary political rhetoric - Critical account of founding can also
de-legitimize - Our goal a historical account of the Founding
that emphasizes politics
3Articles of Confederation
- First National Constitution
- Established 1777 (1781) by states
- Lasted until 1789
- Some accomplishments
- war of independence against Britain won
- Handled territorial conflicts between states
- Significant weaknesses of national government
- Only one branch Continental Congress
- No power to tax directly
- States issued own currency
- States imposed tariffs on each other foreign
goods - Not respected by other countries
- States were the center of political gravity
4How Were the Articles Replaced?
- Peaceful but controversial change
- No violent revolution or coup detat
- Major controversy was shift of (some) political
power from states to central government - That is, a political process
- Who wanted the change?
- Beard Economic elites
- Roche Emerging national political elite
- How did they get it?
- Years of complaint and conventions
- Shays Rebellion
- Philadelphia Convention (1787)
5Was the Constitutional Convention Legitimate?
- Why ask this question?
- motives of the founders politically significant
now - Point here is to focus on political context then
and how that shaped the actions taken - No the legitimacy was shaky at best
- Convention proceedings secret
- Not broadly representative
- Overstepped authority
- Ratification procedure illegal under Articles
- Yes legitimacy should be judged in other ways
- Actions politically necessary or expedient at the
time - Judge by ultimate results the convention ended
up establishing stable government
6Motives of the Founders Economic
- The Charles Beard thesis
- Founders motivated by own narrow economic
interests - Convention composed of economic elites
- Wrote Constitution addressing their economic
grievances with the Articles - Critique of Beard thesis
- Diversity of interests among delegates
- Downplays role of ideals (political and economic)
7Motives of the Founders Political
- Who was involved? What did they want? How (and
when) did they get it? - The founders were politicians
- As a group, they were a Political Reform Caucus
(John Roche) - Economic and political elites
- Focused on dealing with contemporary problems of
Articles government - Operated by debate and compromise
- Aware of political resources and constraints
8Economic Motives New, Expanded Economic Powers
- Key change was that National government got new
economic powers - Seems to be evidence for Beard thesis
- Consider how elites benefitted (Beards focus)
- Consider also the broader economic (and
political) effects and rationales - Federal taxation
- Why would elites want greater tax power?
- Beard bondholders wanted to be repaid
- More broadly, essential fiscal tool for
government (debt and taxes) - National monopoly on tariffs
- Beard reduce shipping costs for merchants,
manufacturers, plantation owners - More broadly, create common market
- National monopoly on paper currency
- Broad argument Typical government tool, eases
coordination problems (cf. establishment of euro) - Beard creditors wanted to control inflation
9Political Disputes and Compromises
- Not all the disputes about economics
- Property Qualifications for Voting
- Common, strongly supported
- Dispute not about whether to have property
qualifications, but how to measure property - Disagreement over proper amount and type of
property reflected changing economy - Solution Leave voter qualifications up to
states - Connecticut (Great) Compromise
- Representation based on population (VA)
- Representation equal for each state (NJ)
- Both, with bicameral legislature (CT)
10Disputes over Slavery
- Why didnt the Constitution written in 1787
abolish slavery? - How did it actually deal with slavery?
- Never mentioned slave or slavery
- Fugitive slave provision
- Three-Fifths Compromise
- Postponed abolition of slave trade
- Explaining the failure to abolish slavery
- Economic interest (rights of property)
- Political necessity
- Racism
11Political Principles in the Constitution I
- Setting up a Republic, Preventing Democracy
- Consent
- Republics legitimacy based on the consent of
the governed - Consent implies dissent can be destabilizing
- Contract defines (specifies) the terms of consent
- How do the governed actually express consent?
- Direct expressions problematic (not required in
Constitution) - Obedience and tacit consent are weak and
ambiguous expressions - Voting gives voice without too much
participation
12Political Principles in the Constitution II
- Representation
- Voters choose representatives to make decisions
(dont make decisions on policy directly) - Key difference (historically) between republic
democracy - Key difference (now) between direct and
representative democracy - Majority Rule
- Not rule by the (majority of the) people
- Decisions (by, for) representatives determined by
majority - But, this has (dangerous) democratic tendencies
13Political Principles in the Constitution III
- Limited Government
- Response to dangers of republic
- Devolution into democracy (i.e. majority
tyranny) - Threatens minority rights
- Rooted in Locke rational individuals will only
consent to a limited government - Strategies for Limiting Government Power
- Structural separation of powers, checks and
balances, federalism - Substantive civil liberties
14The Struggle for Ratification
- Political Context (September 1787)
- Constitution not imposed nor accepted with
universal acclaim - Opponents raised serious objections
- Who ratified?
- Early Successes (Sept. 1787 Feb. 1788)
- Five states ratified by January 1788
- Massachusetts ratified Feb. 1788 by 187-168
15Supporters and Critics of the Constitution
- Federalist Papers
- Begun in fall 1787 to defend/explain the
Constitution - Key authors Hamilton (NY) and Madison (VA)
- Key Criticisms
- Anti-Federalists objected broadly to powerful
national government - Centralization of power
- National government unaccountable to the people
- No Bill of Rights
16How We Got the Bill of Rights
- Not part of original draft of Constitution
- Its inclusion was a key demand of
Anti-Federalists - Federalists struck a deal to get delegate votes
for ratification - Pressure can effect change (even) in a republic