The Founding - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The Founding

Description:

The Founding * Introduction to American Politics * Why Study History in a Political Science Class? U.S. government has old structure Legacy: need to know – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: FrankB76
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Founding


1
The Founding
2
Why Study History in a Political Science Class?
  • U.S. government has old structure
  • Legacy need to know "why it was" to understand
    "what it is"
  • Vestiges constraints posed by "outdated"
    structure
  • Political uses of history History shows
    that.
  • Account of founding can confer legitimacy
  • On government in general
  • On particular policies pursued by government
  • Debate over framers intentions part of
    contemporary political rhetoric
  • Critical account of founding can also
    de-legitimize
  • Our goal a historical account of the Founding
    that emphasizes politics

3
Articles of Confederation
  • First National Constitution
  • Established 1777 (1781) by states
  • Lasted until 1789
  • Some accomplishments
  • war of independence against Britain won
  • Handled territorial conflicts between states
  • Significant weaknesses of national government
  • Only one branch Continental Congress
  • No power to tax directly
  • States issued own currency
  • States imposed tariffs on each other foreign
    goods
  • Not respected by other countries
  • States were the center of political gravity

4
How Were the Articles Replaced?
  • Peaceful but controversial change
  • No violent revolution or coup detat
  • Major controversy was shift of (some) political
    power from states to central government
  • That is, a political process
  • Who wanted the change?
  • Beard Economic elites
  • Roche Emerging national political elite
  • How did they get it?
  • Years of complaint and conventions
  • Shays Rebellion
  • Philadelphia Convention (1787)

5
Was the Constitutional Convention Legitimate?
  • Why ask this question?
  • motives of the founders politically significant
    now
  • Point here is to focus on political context then
    and how that shaped the actions taken
  • No the legitimacy was shaky at best
  • Convention proceedings secret
  • Not broadly representative
  • Overstepped authority
  • Ratification procedure illegal under Articles
  • Yes legitimacy should be judged in other ways
  • Actions politically necessary or expedient at the
    time
  • Judge by ultimate results the convention ended
    up establishing stable government

6
Motives of the Founders Economic
  • The Charles Beard thesis
  • Founders motivated by own narrow economic
    interests
  • Convention composed of economic elites
  • Wrote Constitution addressing their economic
    grievances with the Articles
  • Critique of Beard thesis
  • Diversity of interests among delegates
  • Downplays role of ideals (political and economic)

7
Motives of the Founders Political
  • Who was involved? What did they want? How (and
    when) did they get it?
  • The founders were politicians
  • As a group, they were a Political Reform Caucus
    (John Roche)
  • Economic and political elites
  • Focused on dealing with contemporary problems of
    Articles government
  • Operated by debate and compromise
  • Aware of political resources and constraints

8
Economic Motives New, Expanded Economic Powers
  • Key change was that National government got new
    economic powers
  • Seems to be evidence for Beard thesis
  • Consider how elites benefitted (Beards focus)
  • Consider also the broader economic (and
    political) effects and rationales
  • Federal taxation
  • Why would elites want greater tax power?
  • Beard bondholders wanted to be repaid
  • More broadly, essential fiscal tool for
    government (debt and taxes)
  • National monopoly on tariffs
  • Beard reduce shipping costs for merchants,
    manufacturers, plantation owners
  • More broadly, create common market
  • National monopoly on paper currency
  • Broad argument Typical government tool, eases
    coordination problems (cf. establishment of euro)
  • Beard creditors wanted to control inflation

9
Political Disputes and Compromises
  • Not all the disputes about economics
  • Property Qualifications for Voting
  • Common, strongly supported
  • Dispute not about whether to have property
    qualifications, but how to measure property
  • Disagreement over proper amount and type of
    property reflected changing economy
  • Solution Leave voter qualifications up to
    states
  • Connecticut (Great) Compromise
  • Representation based on population (VA)
  • Representation equal for each state (NJ)
  • Both, with bicameral legislature (CT)

10
Disputes over Slavery
  • Why didnt the Constitution written in 1787
    abolish slavery?
  • How did it actually deal with slavery?
  • Never mentioned slave or slavery
  • Fugitive slave provision
  • Three-Fifths Compromise
  • Postponed abolition of slave trade
  • Explaining the failure to abolish slavery
  • Economic interest (rights of property)
  • Political necessity
  • Racism

11
Political Principles in the Constitution I
  • Setting up a Republic, Preventing Democracy
  • Consent
  • Republics legitimacy based on the consent of
    the governed
  • Consent implies dissent can be destabilizing
  • Contract defines (specifies) the terms of consent
  • How do the governed actually express consent?
  • Direct expressions problematic (not required in
    Constitution)
  • Obedience and tacit consent are weak and
    ambiguous expressions
  • Voting gives voice without too much
    participation

12
Political Principles in the Constitution II
  • Representation
  • Voters choose representatives to make decisions
    (dont make decisions on policy directly)
  • Key difference (historically) between republic
    democracy
  • Key difference (now) between direct and
    representative democracy
  • Majority Rule
  • Not rule by the (majority of the) people
  • Decisions (by, for) representatives determined by
    majority
  • But, this has (dangerous) democratic tendencies

13
Political Principles in the Constitution III
  • Limited Government
  • Response to dangers of republic
  • Devolution into democracy (i.e. majority
    tyranny)
  • Threatens minority rights
  • Rooted in Locke rational individuals will only
    consent to a limited government
  • Strategies for Limiting Government Power
  • Structural separation of powers, checks and
    balances, federalism
  • Substantive civil liberties

14
The Struggle for Ratification
  • Political Context (September 1787)
  • Constitution not imposed nor accepted with
    universal acclaim
  • Opponents raised serious objections
  • Who ratified?
  • Early Successes (Sept. 1787 Feb. 1788)
  • Five states ratified by January 1788
  • Massachusetts ratified Feb. 1788 by 187-168

15
Supporters and Critics of the Constitution
  • Federalist Papers
  • Begun in fall 1787 to defend/explain the
    Constitution
  • Key authors Hamilton (NY) and Madison (VA)
  • Key Criticisms
  • Anti-Federalists objected broadly to powerful
    national government
  • Centralization of power
  • National government unaccountable to the people
  • No Bill of Rights

16
How We Got the Bill of Rights
  • Not part of original draft of Constitution
  • Its inclusion was a key demand of
    Anti-Federalists
  • Federalists struck a deal to get delegate votes
    for ratification
  • Pressure can effect change (even) in a republic
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com