Title: EART160 Planetary Sciences
1EART160 Planetary Sciences
Francis Nimmo
2Last Week Solar System Formation
- Solar system formation involved collapse of a
large gas cloud, triggered by a supernova (which
also generated many of the elements) - Solar system originally consisted of gasicerock
in ratio 10010.1 (solar photosphere primitive
meteorites) - Initial nebula was dense and hot near the sun,
thinner, colder further out - Inner planets are mainly rock outer planets
(beyond the snow line) also include ice and (if
massive enough) gas - Planets grow by collisions Mars-sized bodies
formed within 1 Myr of solar system formation - Late-stage accretion is slow and involved large
impacts
3This Next Week Surfaces
- What are solid planet surfaces made of?
- What processes modify the surfaces?
- Impact craters
- Volcanism
- Tectonics
- Erosion Sedimentation
4Surface Compositions
- How can we tell?
- Samples (Earth, Moon, Mars, Vesta?)
- In situ measurements by spacecraft (Venus, Mars,
Moon, Titan) - Remote sensing (elsewhere)
5Samples
- Very useful, because we can analyze them in the
lab and we (usually) know where they came from - Generally restricted to near-surface
- For the Earth, we have samples of both crust and
(uniquely) the mantle (peridotite xenoliths) - We have 382 kg of lunar rocks (29,000 per pound)
from 6 sites (7 counting 0.13 kg returned by
Soviet missions) - Eucrite meteorites are thought to come from
asteroid 4 Vesta (they have similar spectral
reflectances) - We also have meteorites which came from Mars
how do we know this?
6SNC meteorites
- Shergotty, Nakhla, Chassigny (plus others)
- What are they?
- Mafic rocks, often cumulates
- How do we know theyre from Mars?
- Timing most are 1.3 Gyr old
- Trapped gases are identical in composition to
atmosphere measured by Viking. QED.
2.3mm
McSween, Meteoritics, 1994
7In Situ Measurements
- In situ measurements give us information without
needing samples returned (difficult) - Problem is that only limited data can be returned
- Still useful e.g. we know that the surface of
Venus is basaltic, and that the surface of Titan
has the texture of crème brulee - The Viking spacecraft even carried life detection
experiments, but the results were negative or
ambiguous
Venusian surface (Venera 14)
8In Situ Measurements (Mars)
- Pathfinder (1997) measured rock and soil
compositions using an Alpha Proton X-Ray
Spectrometer (APXS) - This works by irradiating a sample with Alpha
particles and detecting the particles/radiation
given off - One problem was the desert varnish coating the
rocks
- The Mars Exploration Rovers (2004- ) carried a
rock abrasion tool to scrape off the varnish
before carrying out their measurements - The results suggested ancient water had
percolated through the sediments and produced
concretions nicknamed blueberries
blueberries
RAT
9Remote Sensing
- Restricted to surface (mm-mm). Various kinds
- Spectral (usually infra-red) reflectance/absorptio
n gives constraints on likely mineralogies e.g.
Mercury, Europa - Neutron good for sensing subsurface ice (Mars,
Moon)
- Most useful is gamma-ray gives elemental
abundances (especially of naturally radioactive
elements K,U,Th) - Energies of individual gamma-rays are
characteristic of particular elements
10Physical Properties
- In the absence of other processes, ancient crusts
will have been broken up by impacts at all scales - Lunar surface consists of fine-grained dust
(produced by impacts) overlying brecciated,
unconsolidated material (regolith)
- Whether a surface is dusty or consists of solid
rock can be inferred from its thermal inertia
(rocks have a higher T.I.)
11Summary Planetary Crusts
- Surfaces are expected to be broken up by impacts
(regolith) - Remote sensing (IR, gamma-ray) allows inference
of surface (crustal) mineralogies compositions - Earth basaltic (oceans) / andesitic (continents)
- Moon basaltic (lowlands) / anorthositic
(highlands) - Mars basaltic (plus andesitic?)
- Venus basaltic
- In all cases, these crusts are distinct from
likely bulk mantle compositions indicative of
melting - The basaltic compositions are all very similar,
suggesting planetary mantles have similar
compositions - The crusts are also very poor in iron relative to
bulk nebular composition where has all the iron
gone?
12Impact Cratering
- Important topic, for several reasons
- Ubiquitous impacts occur everywhere
- Dating degree of cratering provides information
on how old a surface is - Style of impact crater provides clues to the
nature of the subsurface and atmosphere - Impacts produce planetary regolith
- Impacts can have catastrophic effects on planets
(not to mention their inhabitants) - What we will cover
- What are the physical effects of impacts?
- What can we infer about a planet from its
cratering record?
13Why do impacts happen?
- Debris is left over from solar system formation
(asteroids, comets, Kuiper Belt objects etc.) - Object perturbed by something (e.g. Jupiter) into
an orbit which crosses a planetary body - As it gets closer, the object is accelerated
towards the planet because of the planets
gravitational attraction - The minimum impact speed is the planets escape
velocity, typically many km/s
The next big event for astronomers will be
Friday April 13th 2029. Scientists predict that
the asteroid Apophis (400m diameter) will be
coming only 32,000 kilometres from the Earth,
which is close enough to hit a weather satellite
and even be visible without a telescope.
14Gravity
- Newtons inverse square law for gravitation
Here F is the force acting in a straight line
joining masses m1 and m2 separated by a distance
r G is a constant (6.67x10-11 m3kg-1s-2)
- Hence we can obtain the acceleration g at the
surface of a planet
- We can also obtain the gravitational potential U
at the surface (i.e. the work done to get a unit
mass from infinity to that point)
What does the negative sign mean?
15Escape velocity and impact energy
M
r
R
- How much kinetic energy do we have to add to an
object to move it from the surface of the planet
to infinity? - The velocity required is the escape velocity
- Equally, an object starting from rest at infinity
will impact the planet at this escape velocity - Earth vesc11 km/s. How big an asteroid would
cause an explosion equal to that at Hiroshima?
16Crater Basics
Ejecta blanket
Depth
- Typical depthdiameter ratio is 15 for simple
(bowl-shaped) craters
Mars, MOC image
17Crater Formation
1. Contact/compression
- Impactor is (mostly) destroyed on impact
- Initial impact velocity is (usually) greater than
sound speed, creating shock waves - Shock waves propagate outwards and downwards
- Heating and melting occur
- Shock waves lead to excavation of material
- Transient crater is spherical
- Crater later relaxes
2. Excavation
3. Modification
Note overturned strata at surface
18Timescales
v
- Contact and compression
- Time for shock-wave to pass across impactor
- Typically less than 1s
2r
- Excavation
- Free-fall time for ejected material
- Up to a few minutes
d
- Modification
- Initial faulting and slumping probably happens
over a few hours - Long-term shallowing and relaxation can take
place over millions of years
19Crater Sizes
- A good rule of thumb is that an impactor will
create a crater roughly 10 times the size
(depends on velocity) - We can come up with a rough argument based on
energy for how big the transient crater should be
Does this make sense?
v
2r
2R
- E.g. on Earth an impactor of 0.1 (1) km radius
and velocity of 10 km/s will make a crater of
radius 2 (12) km - For really small craters, the strength of the
material which is being impacted becomes
important
20Craters of different shapes
- Crater shapes change as size increases
- Small simple craters (bowl-shaped)
- Medium complex craters (central peak)
- Large impact basins
- Transition size varies with surface gravity and
material properties
BASIN Hellas, Mars
SIMPLE Moltke, Moon, 7km
COMPLEX Euler, 28km, 2.5km deep
21Shape transitions
Schenk (2002)
- Europa, scale bar10km
- Note change in morphology as size increase
Lunar curve
- Depth/diameter ratio decreases as craters get
larger - Gravity on icy satellites similar to that on the
Moon - Transition occurs at smaller diameters than for
Moon due to weaker target material? (ice vs.
rock)
Ganymede
complex
simple
basins
22Unusual craters
- 1) Crater chains (catenae)
- 2) Splotches
- 3) Rampart Craters (Mars)
- 4) Oblique impacts
- Crater chains occur when a weak impactor (comet?)
gets pulled apart by tides
Crater chain, Callisto, 340km long
Comet Shoemaker-Levy, ripped apart by Jupiters
tidal forces
23Rampart Craters (Mars)
- Probably caused by melting of subsurface ice
leading to slurry ejecta - Useful for mapping subsurface ice
Tooting crater (28 km diameter)
Tooting crater, 28km diameter
Stewart et al., Shock Compression Condens. Matt.
2004
24Airbursts
- Result of (weak) impactor disintegrating in
atmosphere
300km across, radar image
- Thick atmosphere of Venus means a lack of craters
smaller than about 3 km (they break up in
atmosphere)
25Oblique Impacts
- Impacts are most like explosions spherical
shock wave leads to circular craters - Not understood prior to the space age argument
against impact craters on the Moon - Only very oblique (gt75o?) impacts cause
non-circular craters - Non-circular craters are rare
impact
Mars, D12km Herrick, Mars crater consortium
26Atmospheric Effects
- Small impactors burn up in the atmosphere
- Venus, Earth, Titan lack small impact craters
- Venus thick atmosphere may produce other effects
(e.g. outflows)
After McKinnon et al. 1997
Radar image of impact-related outflow feature
27How often do they happen? (Earth)
Hartmann
28How do we date surfaces (1)?
young
old
Saturation
Slope depends on impactor population
Effect of secondary craters?
- Crater densities a more heavily cratered
surface is older - The size-distribution of craters can tell us
about the processes removing them - Densities reach a maximum when each new crater
destroys one old crater (saturation). Phobos
surface is close to saturated.
Increasing age
- Lunar crater densities can be compared with
measured surface ages from samples returned by
Apollo missions
29How do we date surfaces (2)?
- It is easy to determine the relative ages of
different surfaces (young vs. old) - Determing the absolute ages means we need to know
the cratering rate (impacts per year)
Number of craters gt1km diameter per km2
- We know the cratering rates on the Earth and
the Moon, but we have to put in a correction
(fudge factor) to convert it to other places - So the uncertainties tend to be large,
especially for intermediate-age surfaces
30New craters on Mars
- Important because we can use these observations
to calibrate our age-crater density curves - Existing curves look about right
Before
After
Malin et al. Science 2006
Probably mis-identified
31Evolving impactor population
- One complication is that the population of
impactors has changed over time - Early solar system had lots of debris gt high
rate of impacts - More recent impact flux has been lower, and size
distribution of impactors may also have been
different - Did the impact flux decrease steadily, or was
there an impact spike at 4 Gyr (Late Heavy
Bombardment)?
Hartmann W are numerical simulation results,
boxes are data from Moon/Earth
32Crater Counts
- Crater size-frequency plots can be used to infer
geological history of surfaces - Example on left shows that intermediate-size
craters show lower density than large craters
(why?)
saturation
frequency
size
- Smallest craters are virtually absent (why?)
- Most geological processes (e.g. erosion,
sedimentation) will remove smaller craters more
rapidly than larger craters - So surfaces tend to look younger at small scales
rather than at large scales
33Complications
- Rate of impacts was certainly not constant, maybe
not even monotonic (Late Heavy Bombardment?) - Secondary craters can seriously complicate the
cratering record - Some surfaces may be buried and then exhumed,
giving misleading dates (Mars) - Subsurface impact basins (Mars)
- Very large uncertainties in absolute ages,
especially in outer solar system
Pwyll crater, Europa (25 km diameter)
34Cratering record on different bodies
- Earth few craters (why?)
- Titan only 2 craters identified so far (why?)
- Mercury, Phobos, Callisto heavily cratered
everywhere (close to saturation) - Moon saturated highlands, heavily cratered
maria - Mars heavily cratered highlands, lightly
cratered lowlands (plus buried basins) and
volcanoes - Venus uniform crater distribution, 0.5 Gyr
surface age, no small craters (why?) - Ganymede saturated dark terrain, cratered light
terrain - Europa lightly cratered (0.05 Gyr)
- Io no craters at all (why?)
35Where do impactors come from?
- In inner solar system, mostly asteroids, roughly
10 comets (higher velocity, 50 km/s vs. 15
km/s) - Comets may have been important for delivering
volatiles atmosphere to inner solar system - In outer solar system, impactors exclusively
comets - Different reservoirs have different freq.
distributions - Comet reservoirs are Oort Cloud and Kuiper Belt
- Orbits are perturbed by interaction with planets
(usually Jupiter) - There may have been an impact spike in the
inner solar system when the giant planets
rearranged themselves (not quite as unlikely as
it sounds)
36Summary
- Planetary crustal compositions may be determined
by in situ measurements or remote sensing
(spectroscopy) - Most planetary crusts are basaltic
- Impact velocity will be (at least) escape
velocity - Impacts are energetic and make craters
- Crater size depends on impactor size, impact
velocity, surface gravity - Crater morphology changes with increasing size
- Crater size-frequency distribution can be used to
date planetary surfaces - Atmospheres and geological processes can affect
size-frequency distributions
37Key concepts
- Spectroscopy (IR, gamma-ray)
- Regolith
- SNC meteorite
- Gravitational potential
- Escape velocity
- Simple vs. complex crater vs. impact basin
- Depthdiameter ratio
- Saturation
- Size-frequency distribution
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)