EART160 Planetary Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

EART160 Planetary Sciences

Description:

EART160 Planetary Sciences Francis Nimmo Cratering record on different bodies Earth few craters (why?) Titan only 2 craters identified so far (why?) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: nim5
Learn more at: https://es.ucsc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EART160 Planetary Sciences


1
EART160 Planetary Sciences
Francis Nimmo
2
Last Week Solar System Formation
  • Solar system formation involved collapse of a
    large gas cloud, triggered by a supernova (which
    also generated many of the elements)
  • Solar system originally consisted of gasicerock
    in ratio 10010.1 (solar photosphere primitive
    meteorites)
  • Initial nebula was dense and hot near the sun,
    thinner, colder further out
  • Inner planets are mainly rock outer planets
    (beyond the snow line) also include ice and (if
    massive enough) gas
  • Planets grow by collisions Mars-sized bodies
    formed within 1 Myr of solar system formation
  • Late-stage accretion is slow and involved large
    impacts

3
This Next Week Surfaces
  • What are solid planet surfaces made of?
  • What processes modify the surfaces?
  • Impact craters
  • Volcanism
  • Tectonics
  • Erosion Sedimentation

4
Surface Compositions
  • How can we tell?
  • Samples (Earth, Moon, Mars, Vesta?)
  • In situ measurements by spacecraft (Venus, Mars,
    Moon, Titan)
  • Remote sensing (elsewhere)

5
Samples
  • Very useful, because we can analyze them in the
    lab and we (usually) know where they came from
  • Generally restricted to near-surface
  • For the Earth, we have samples of both crust and
    (uniquely) the mantle (peridotite xenoliths)
  • We have 382 kg of lunar rocks (29,000 per pound)
    from 6 sites (7 counting 0.13 kg returned by
    Soviet missions)
  • Eucrite meteorites are thought to come from
    asteroid 4 Vesta (they have similar spectral
    reflectances)
  • We also have meteorites which came from Mars
    how do we know this?

6
SNC meteorites
  • Shergotty, Nakhla, Chassigny (plus others)
  • What are they?
  • Mafic rocks, often cumulates
  • How do we know theyre from Mars?
  • Timing most are 1.3 Gyr old
  • Trapped gases are identical in composition to
    atmosphere measured by Viking. QED.

2.3mm
McSween, Meteoritics, 1994
7
In Situ Measurements
  • In situ measurements give us information without
    needing samples returned (difficult)
  • Problem is that only limited data can be returned
  • Still useful e.g. we know that the surface of
    Venus is basaltic, and that the surface of Titan
    has the texture of crème brulee
  • The Viking spacecraft even carried life detection
    experiments, but the results were negative or
    ambiguous

Venusian surface (Venera 14)
8
In Situ Measurements (Mars)
  • Pathfinder (1997) measured rock and soil
    compositions using an Alpha Proton X-Ray
    Spectrometer (APXS)
  • This works by irradiating a sample with Alpha
    particles and detecting the particles/radiation
    given off
  • One problem was the desert varnish coating the
    rocks
  • The Mars Exploration Rovers (2004- ) carried a
    rock abrasion tool to scrape off the varnish
    before carrying out their measurements
  • The results suggested ancient water had
    percolated through the sediments and produced
    concretions nicknamed blueberries

blueberries
RAT
9
Remote Sensing
  • Restricted to surface (mm-mm). Various kinds
  • Spectral (usually infra-red) reflectance/absorptio
    n gives constraints on likely mineralogies e.g.
    Mercury, Europa
  • Neutron good for sensing subsurface ice (Mars,
    Moon)
  • Most useful is gamma-ray gives elemental
    abundances (especially of naturally radioactive
    elements K,U,Th)
  • Energies of individual gamma-rays are
    characteristic of particular elements

10
Physical Properties
  • In the absence of other processes, ancient crusts
    will have been broken up by impacts at all scales
  • Lunar surface consists of fine-grained dust
    (produced by impacts) overlying brecciated,
    unconsolidated material (regolith)
  • Whether a surface is dusty or consists of solid
    rock can be inferred from its thermal inertia
    (rocks have a higher T.I.)

11
Summary Planetary Crusts
  • Surfaces are expected to be broken up by impacts
    (regolith)
  • Remote sensing (IR, gamma-ray) allows inference
    of surface (crustal) mineralogies compositions
  • Earth basaltic (oceans) / andesitic (continents)
  • Moon basaltic (lowlands) / anorthositic
    (highlands)
  • Mars basaltic (plus andesitic?)
  • Venus basaltic
  • In all cases, these crusts are distinct from
    likely bulk mantle compositions indicative of
    melting
  • The basaltic compositions are all very similar,
    suggesting planetary mantles have similar
    compositions
  • The crusts are also very poor in iron relative to
    bulk nebular composition where has all the iron
    gone?

12
Impact Cratering
  • Important topic, for several reasons
  • Ubiquitous impacts occur everywhere
  • Dating degree of cratering provides information
    on how old a surface is
  • Style of impact crater provides clues to the
    nature of the subsurface and atmosphere
  • Impacts produce planetary regolith
  • Impacts can have catastrophic effects on planets
    (not to mention their inhabitants)
  • What we will cover
  • What are the physical effects of impacts?
  • What can we infer about a planet from its
    cratering record?

13
Why do impacts happen?
  • Debris is left over from solar system formation
    (asteroids, comets, Kuiper Belt objects etc.)
  • Object perturbed by something (e.g. Jupiter) into
    an orbit which crosses a planetary body
  • As it gets closer, the object is accelerated
    towards the planet because of the planets
    gravitational attraction
  • The minimum impact speed is the planets escape
    velocity, typically many km/s

The next big event for astronomers will be
Friday April 13th 2029. Scientists predict that
the asteroid Apophis (400m diameter) will be
coming only 32,000 kilometres from the Earth,
which is close enough to hit a weather satellite
and even be visible without a telescope.
14
Gravity
  • Newtons inverse square law for gravitation

Here F is the force acting in a straight line
joining masses m1 and m2 separated by a distance
r G is a constant (6.67x10-11 m3kg-1s-2)
  • Hence we can obtain the acceleration g at the
    surface of a planet
  • We can also obtain the gravitational potential U
    at the surface (i.e. the work done to get a unit
    mass from infinity to that point)

What does the negative sign mean?
15
Escape velocity and impact energy
M
  • Gravitational potential

r
R
  • How much kinetic energy do we have to add to an
    object to move it from the surface of the planet
    to infinity?
  • The velocity required is the escape velocity
  • Equally, an object starting from rest at infinity
    will impact the planet at this escape velocity
  • Earth vesc11 km/s. How big an asteroid would
    cause an explosion equal to that at Hiroshima?

16
Crater Basics
Ejecta blanket
Depth
  • Typical depthdiameter ratio is 15 for simple
    (bowl-shaped) craters

Mars, MOC image
17
Crater Formation
1. Contact/compression
  • Impactor is (mostly) destroyed on impact
  • Initial impact velocity is (usually) greater than
    sound speed, creating shock waves
  • Shock waves propagate outwards and downwards
  • Heating and melting occur
  • Shock waves lead to excavation of material
  • Transient crater is spherical
  • Crater later relaxes

2. Excavation
3. Modification
Note overturned strata at surface
18
Timescales
v
  • Contact and compression
  • Time for shock-wave to pass across impactor
  • Typically less than 1s

2r
  • Excavation
  • Free-fall time for ejected material
  • Up to a few minutes

d
  • Modification
  • Initial faulting and slumping probably happens
    over a few hours
  • Long-term shallowing and relaxation can take
    place over millions of years

19
Crater Sizes
  • A good rule of thumb is that an impactor will
    create a crater roughly 10 times the size
    (depends on velocity)
  • We can come up with a rough argument based on
    energy for how big the transient crater should be

Does this make sense?
v
2r
2R
  • E.g. on Earth an impactor of 0.1 (1) km radius
    and velocity of 10 km/s will make a crater of
    radius 2 (12) km
  • For really small craters, the strength of the
    material which is being impacted becomes
    important

20
Craters of different shapes
  • Crater shapes change as size increases
  • Small simple craters (bowl-shaped)
  • Medium complex craters (central peak)
  • Large impact basins
  • Transition size varies with surface gravity and
    material properties

BASIN Hellas, Mars
SIMPLE Moltke, Moon, 7km
COMPLEX Euler, 28km, 2.5km deep
21
Shape transitions
Schenk (2002)
  • Europa, scale bar10km
  • Note change in morphology as size increase

Lunar curve
  • Depth/diameter ratio decreases as craters get
    larger
  • Gravity on icy satellites similar to that on the
    Moon
  • Transition occurs at smaller diameters than for
    Moon due to weaker target material? (ice vs.
    rock)

Ganymede
complex
simple
basins
22
Unusual craters
  • 1) Crater chains (catenae)
  • 2) Splotches
  • 3) Rampart Craters (Mars)
  • 4) Oblique impacts
  • Crater chains occur when a weak impactor (comet?)
    gets pulled apart by tides

Crater chain, Callisto, 340km long
Comet Shoemaker-Levy, ripped apart by Jupiters
tidal forces
23
Rampart Craters (Mars)
  • Probably caused by melting of subsurface ice
    leading to slurry ejecta
  • Useful for mapping subsurface ice

Tooting crater (28 km diameter)
Tooting crater, 28km diameter
Stewart et al., Shock Compression Condens. Matt.
2004
24
Airbursts
  • Venus dark splotches
  • Tunguska, Siberia 1908
  • Result of (weak) impactor disintegrating in
    atmosphere

300km across, radar image
  • Thick atmosphere of Venus means a lack of craters
    smaller than about 3 km (they break up in
    atmosphere)

25
Oblique Impacts
  • Impacts are most like explosions spherical
    shock wave leads to circular craters
  • Not understood prior to the space age argument
    against impact craters on the Moon
  • Only very oblique (gt75o?) impacts cause
    non-circular craters
  • Non-circular craters are rare

impact
Mars, D12km Herrick, Mars crater consortium
26
Atmospheric Effects
  • Small impactors burn up in the atmosphere
  • Venus, Earth, Titan lack small impact craters
  • Venus thick atmosphere may produce other effects
    (e.g. outflows)

After McKinnon et al. 1997
Radar image of impact-related outflow feature
27
How often do they happen? (Earth)
Hartmann
28
How do we date surfaces (1)?
young
old
Saturation
Slope depends on impactor population
Effect of secondary craters?
  • Crater densities a more heavily cratered
    surface is older
  • The size-distribution of craters can tell us
    about the processes removing them
  • Densities reach a maximum when each new crater
    destroys one old crater (saturation). Phobos
    surface is close to saturated.

Increasing age
  • Lunar crater densities can be compared with
    measured surface ages from samples returned by
    Apollo missions

29
How do we date surfaces (2)?
  • It is easy to determine the relative ages of
    different surfaces (young vs. old)
  • Determing the absolute ages means we need to know
    the cratering rate (impacts per year)

Number of craters gt1km diameter per km2
  • We know the cratering rates on the Earth and
    the Moon, but we have to put in a correction
    (fudge factor) to convert it to other places
  • So the uncertainties tend to be large,
    especially for intermediate-age surfaces

30
New craters on Mars
  • Important because we can use these observations
    to calibrate our age-crater density curves
  • Existing curves look about right

Before
After
Malin et al. Science 2006
Probably mis-identified
31
Evolving impactor population
  • One complication is that the population of
    impactors has changed over time
  • Early solar system had lots of debris gt high
    rate of impacts
  • More recent impact flux has been lower, and size
    distribution of impactors may also have been
    different
  • Did the impact flux decrease steadily, or was
    there an impact spike at 4 Gyr (Late Heavy
    Bombardment)?

Hartmann W are numerical simulation results,
boxes are data from Moon/Earth
32
Crater Counts
  • Crater size-frequency plots can be used to infer
    geological history of surfaces
  • Example on left shows that intermediate-size
    craters show lower density than large craters
    (why?)

saturation
frequency
size
  • Smallest craters are virtually absent (why?)
  • Most geological processes (e.g. erosion,
    sedimentation) will remove smaller craters more
    rapidly than larger craters
  • So surfaces tend to look younger at small scales
    rather than at large scales

33
Complications
  • Rate of impacts was certainly not constant, maybe
    not even monotonic (Late Heavy Bombardment?)
  • Secondary craters can seriously complicate the
    cratering record
  • Some surfaces may be buried and then exhumed,
    giving misleading dates (Mars)
  • Subsurface impact basins (Mars)
  • Very large uncertainties in absolute ages,
    especially in outer solar system

Pwyll crater, Europa (25 km diameter)
34
Cratering record on different bodies
  • Earth few craters (why?)
  • Titan only 2 craters identified so far (why?)
  • Mercury, Phobos, Callisto heavily cratered
    everywhere (close to saturation)
  • Moon saturated highlands, heavily cratered
    maria
  • Mars heavily cratered highlands, lightly
    cratered lowlands (plus buried basins) and
    volcanoes
  • Venus uniform crater distribution, 0.5 Gyr
    surface age, no small craters (why?)
  • Ganymede saturated dark terrain, cratered light
    terrain
  • Europa lightly cratered (0.05 Gyr)
  • Io no craters at all (why?)

35
Where do impactors come from?
  • In inner solar system, mostly asteroids, roughly
    10 comets (higher velocity, 50 km/s vs. 15
    km/s)
  • Comets may have been important for delivering
    volatiles atmosphere to inner solar system
  • In outer solar system, impactors exclusively
    comets
  • Different reservoirs have different freq.
    distributions
  • Comet reservoirs are Oort Cloud and Kuiper Belt
  • Orbits are perturbed by interaction with planets
    (usually Jupiter)
  • There may have been an impact spike in the
    inner solar system when the giant planets
    rearranged themselves (not quite as unlikely as
    it sounds)

36
Summary
  • Planetary crustal compositions may be determined
    by in situ measurements or remote sensing
    (spectroscopy)
  • Most planetary crusts are basaltic
  • Impact velocity will be (at least) escape
    velocity
  • Impacts are energetic and make craters
  • Crater size depends on impactor size, impact
    velocity, surface gravity
  • Crater morphology changes with increasing size
  • Crater size-frequency distribution can be used to
    date planetary surfaces
  • Atmospheres and geological processes can affect
    size-frequency distributions

37
Key concepts
  • Spectroscopy (IR, gamma-ray)
  • Regolith
  • SNC meteorite
  • Gravitational potential
  • Escape velocity
  • Simple vs. complex crater vs. impact basin
  • Depthdiameter ratio
  • Saturation
  • Size-frequency distribution

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com