Prenatal Screening Using Free DNA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Prenatal Screening Using Free DNA

Description:

Prenatal Screening Using Free DNA in Maternal Blood Jacob Canick, PhD Alpert Medical School of Brown University Women & Infants Hospital Providence, RI, USA – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:202
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: JCan54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prenatal Screening Using Free DNA


1
Prenatal Screening Using Free DNA in Maternal
Blood Jacob Canick, PhD Alpert Medical School
of Brown University Women Infants
Hospital Providence, RI, USA Department of
Pathology Montefiore Medical Center Bronx,
NY March 17, 2011
2
Declaration of Interests Pertinent to this
Discussion
Funding from SEQUENOM, Inc., San Diego, CA, to
conduct a clinical study on tests for trisomy 21
in pregnancy using fetal nucleic acids in
maternal plasma.
3
Current Screening Uses Prenatal Markers of the
Down Syndrome Phenotype
  • The best test performance is currently
  • 95 DR _at_ 5 FPR
  • or Full/Sequential
    Integrated Test
  • 90 DR _at_ 2 FPR
  • 85 DR _at_ 5 FPR 1st Trim. Combined or
    Serum Integrated Test
  • 80 DR _at_ 5 FPR 2nd Trim. Quad Test
  • All screen positive women should be counseled on
    risks and benefits of invasive procedures for
    karyotype analysis.

4
Current Screening for fetal Down Syndrome using
Phenotypic or Surrogate Markers
Fetal ultrasound Nuchal Translucency
increased Nasal Bone absent/small
Nuchal fold thickness larger
Femur/Humerus shorter Echogenic cardiac
focus present Ductus venosus doppler
reversed a-wave
Maternal Serum PAPP-A low
AFP low uE3 low
b-hCG elevated inhibin A elevated
Nasal Bone
Nuchal Translucency
Ductus venosus doppler
www.fetalmedicine.com/fmf
5
Future Prenatal Testing Prenatal Screening and
Diagnosis of Fetal Trisomies
  • New direction direct identification of the
    disorder (markers of genotype rather than
    markers of phenotype).
  • Targeted to the specific numerical chromosomal
    disorder
  • Trisomy 21 rather than Down syndrome phenotype
  • Trisomy 18 rather than Edwards syndrome
    phenotype
  • Trisomy 13 rather than Patau syndrome phenotype
  • Measure specific free fetal nucleic acids (DNA or
    RNA) in the maternal circulation.

6
Background Fetal Nucleic Acids in Maternal Plasma
  • First report of free fetal DNA in maternal
    circulation. (Lo YMD et al. Lancet
    1997350485-7)
  • Fetal DNA clears rapidly from maternal
    circulation after the baby is delivered. (Lo YMD
    et al. Am J Hum Genet 199964218-24)
  • First report of free fetal RNA in maternal
    circulation. (Poon LLM et al. Clin Chem
    2000461832-4)
  • Prenatal diagnosis of fetal RHD status by
    molecular analysis of maternal plasma. (Lo YMD et
    al. N Engl J Med 19983391734-8)

7
Cell-free DNA in the Maternal Circulation
  • Both cell-free fetal and cell-free maternal DNA
    circulate in maternal plasma.
  • Cell-free fetal and maternal DNA circulate in
    maternal plasma as relatively short fragments
    (150-200 base pairs) and represent the entire
    genome.
  • Fetal DNA comes primarily from the placenta.
  • Maternal DNA comes primarily from maternal blood
    cells.
  • Fetal DNA is 5-25 of the total cell-free DNA
    (10 on average).

8
Potential clinical applications of analysing
fetal nucleic acids in maternal plasma. Lo and
Chiu, Nature Reviews Genetics 2007
9
Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS)
Identifying Down syndrome using circulating cell
free DNA in maternal plasma
10
First publications on MPS for trisomy 21 detection
PNAS 200810520458
11
The Concept 10 of free DNA in maternal plasma
is fetal
Relative amount of chromosome 21 Normal Mother
Normal Fetus
Relative amount of chromosome 21
Normal Mother Down syndrome Fetus
18 copies 2 copies 20 copies
18 copies 3 copies 21 copies
Need to distinguish 21 copies from 20 copies, a
5 difference. (assumes 10 of ccfDNA is fetal)
12
But, fetal and maternal DNA are not
distinguishable by MPS
Relative amount of chromosome 21
Relative amount of chromosome 21
18 copies 2 copies 20 copies
18 copies 3 copies 21 copies
Need to distinguish 21 copies from 20 copies, a
5 difference. (assumes 10 of ccfDNA is fetal)
13
Schematic illustration of the procedural
framework for using massively parallel genomic
sequencing for the noninvasive prenatal detection
of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy.
Chiu R W K et al. PNAS 200810520458
14
Schematic illustration (cont)
chr21 1 / 51 2
Chiu R W K et al. PNAS 200810520458
15
Schematic illustration (cont)
  • For each chromosome, determine its average of
    unique sequences, compared to the total number of
    sequences in the normal human genome.
  • Do this by getting data from many normal
    samples.
  • This will produce a normal distribution (mean
    SD) for each chromosome.
  • For example

unique sequences in chromosome 21 in six
different euploid genomes 2.01 2.00 1.98
2.02 2.03 1.99 2.01 0.02 (mean standard
deviation)
16
Schematic illustration (cont)
mean
4 5 6.
. -6 -5 -4
Z score ( SD)
schematic from www.sci.sdsu.edu
17
Schematic illustration (cont)
To test an individual Determine the of
chromosome 21 unique sequences for that person
and compare that to the mean, in terms of SD
(Z Score).
unique sequences in chromosome 21 in euploid
in test sample
2.01 2.00 1.98 2.02 2.03 1.99 ------ 2.01 0.02
2.11
Chiu R W K et al. PNAS 200810520458
18
Schematic illustration (cont)
Chiu R W K et al. PNAS 200810520458
19
How is this implemented?
20
Four steps in the MPS process
  • Library Preparation
  • Purify free DNA from maternal plasma (already
    fragmented)
  • Add special adapters to both ends
  • Dilute to get proper concentration range
  • Cluster Generation
  • Run samples through Illumina flow cell (8 lanes
    per cell) to capture fragments
  • Solid-phase amplification of fragments to
    generate clusters

1 2 3
4
21
Four steps in the MPS process
  • Sequencing by Synthesis
  • Illumina High Seq 200, a pumping and imaging
    system
  • Sequence the first 36 bases
  • gt10 million clusters sequenced per flow cell lane
  • gt1 terabyte of data per flow cell
  • Data Analysis
  • Alignment (chromosome matching) using human
    genome database
  • One matching error per 36 bases allowed
  • Interpretation of results
  • of matches on chromosome 21
  • Z score for each sample

22
Published results so far
23
Proportion of unique sequences per chromosome,
from three plasma samples and genome database
Unique matches ()
Chromosome Number
Chiu R W K et al. PNAS 200810520458
24
Proportion of unique sequences per chromosome,
from three plasma samples and genome database
Chiu R W K et al. PNAS 200810520458
25
Percent unique reads and corresponding z-score
for chromosome 21, on 28 maternal plasma samples
of all unique reads
Black genomic representation Blue normal
male Orange normal female Green T21
male Red T21 female
Z-score
Normal range
Chiu R W K et al. PNAS 200810520458
26
Z scores for each chromosome
27
New publications on MPS for trisomy 21 detection
28
8-plex 86 cases 571 controls
DR 79 FPR 1
2-plex 86 cases 146 controls
DR 100 FPR 2
29
monoplex 39 cases 410 controls
DR 100 FPR 0.3
30
  • Enrolled pregnant women, from 27 Recruitment
    Sites worldwide, were at high risk based on
    prenatal screening, abnormal fetal ultrasound,
    age gt38 years.
  • All enrollees had maternal plasma samples taken
    prior to CVS or amniocentesis sample processing
    within 6 hours.
  • More than 4500 women enrolled, with more than 200
    cases of fetal trisomy 21 (half 1st trim, half
    2nd trim.)
  • Other aneuploidies are also studied.
  • Testing of coded samples by Massively Parallel
    Sequencing of free DNA in the maternal plasma at
    SCMM.
  • Funded by Sequenom Inc.

31
Free DNA-based Testing for Trisomy 21 Further
Issues
  • Cost
  • hundreds, thousands of ?
  • getting less expensive very quickly
  • Turnaround time
  • 3 days, 7 days, longer?
  • Availability
  • limited lab sites
  • intellectual property issues
  • Amnio/CVS still necessary?
  • Is it diagnostic, or just a very good screening
    test?

32
Conclusions
  • Current methods of prenatal screening reach a
    performance of 90 DR at a 5 FPR.
  • Measurement of free DNA in the maternal
    circulation holds the possibility for
    considerably better screening performance,
    perhaps even non-invasive diagnosis.
  • Currently, massive genomic sequencing appears to
    hold the most promise.
  • Other chromosomal aneuploidies should be able to
    be identified by this approach.
  • Other genetic defects, including single gene
    disorders, may also be identified by this
    approach.

33
Fetal DNA Study Collaborators
Women Infants Hospital/Brown University Glenn
Palomaki, PhD Ed Kloza, MS Geralyn
Lambert-Messerlian, PhD Regina Traficante,
PhD UCLA School of Medicine Stan Nelson,
MD Wayne Grody, MD, PhD Sequenom Center for
Molecular Medicine Mathias Ehrich, MD Dirk van
den Boom, PhD Allan Bombard, MD and
investigators at 27 sites in NA, SA, Europe,
Australia
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com