Title: History and Theory of European Integration
1History and Theory of European Integration
2Lecture 5
-
- A decade of Enlargements
- (1969-1979)
3Contents
- The Hague, relaunch of European Integration
- Accession negotiations with Britain, Denmark,
Ireland and Norway and accession of the UK,
Denmark, Ireland - Werner plan for the Economic and Monetary Union
(1970), launch of the monetary snake (1972) and
plan for the European Monetary system and
European Monetary mechanism (1978)
4Recommended Readings
- Dinan Desmond (1999) Ever Closer Union. An
Introduction to European Integration. Second
edition. The European Union Series. Palgrave.
Chapter 3. - Robert Skidelsky The Choice for Europe. 1970.
Pro-European Reader. 2002. Palgrave - Helmut Schmidt We Need the British.1974.
Pro-European Reader. 2002. Palgrave
5The Dark ages of the 70s Community in a Time of
Flux
- Community ineffective response to the oil crisis
- Decision - making gridlocks in the Council
- Eurosclerosis
- The Hague spirit
- December 1969 summit of states
- new political dynamics and tensions
- Agreement on the basis of
- Identity of aspirations? Or Convergence of
interests
6Liberal intergovernmentalism fundamentals
- States are the major actors (unitary actors)
- Foreign policy goals shift in response to
changing pressures from domestic interest groups - State preferences are neither fixed nor uniform
- Governments relative bargaining power is the
result of asymmetric distribution of information
and benefits of a specific agreement - International institutions are designed and
established to overcome first order (achieving
coordination) and second order problems (control
over observing rules for distribution of gains) - Institutions design reflect the functions and
specific problems of the cooperation - Institutions reduce the costs for achieving the
outcomes and controlling the behavior of states.
7Object of study
- Actors
- Actors preferences and sources of their change
- Institutional design
8Actors
- EU can be best understood as a series of
rational choices made by national leaders. These
choices responded to constraints and
opportunities stemming from - economic interests of powerful domestic
constituents, - the relative power of each state in the
international system, and - the role of institutions in bolstering the
credibility of interstate commitments - (Moravcsik A. (1998) The Choice for Europe
Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to
Maastricht. Cornell University press)
9Preferences are issue specific
- Domestic preferences reflecting the
competitiveness of national economy act as a
filter between the structural incentives of
international economy and the national
preferences (Schimmelfennig F. Liberal
Intergovernmentalism (2004) in European
Integration Theory. Wiener A. and Diez Th. (eds).
Oxford) - ideological geopolitical preferences can
influence national preferences - international interdependence can serve as a
catalyst of societal demand for integration
10Integration
- Integration - a means to secure commercial
advantage through intergovernmental bargaining on
distribution of gains - Three assumptions about integration process
- First order problems do not exist
- Second order problems dominate
- Supranational entrepreneurship is not necessary
11Institutional design
- driven by governments to overcome high
transaction costs and information assymetrics - supranational institutions assigned a role in the
second order issues - the degree of pooling of sovereignty or
delegating to supranational institutions
dependant on the value placed on the outcome - delegation to supranational institutions acts as
a safeguard against short term preferences of the
governments
12The intergovernmental approach limitations
- biased case selection (EC, IGC, Treaty
amendments) - problem of separating the substantive bargaining
and institutional choice - neglect of integration dynamics (ECJ)
13France
- Georges Pompidous objectives and challenges
- De Gaulles heritage
- Retaining Frances influence and credibility in
the EU - Overcoming persistent economic and monetary
problems - Enhancing Frances international standing
- Counterbalancing Germanys growing economic
power and political assertiveness
14Germany
- Willy Brandt s objectives and challenges
- Asserting Germanys international position
- Normalizing Germanys relations within the East
Ostpolitik - Overcoming domestic opposition of Christian
democrats to the Ostpolitic - Appeasing the member states fears of Germanys
resurgence
15Britain
- Harold Wilson challenges
- EU entry
16The Hague spirit - Completion, deepening,
enlargement
- Completion finalizing the regulations for
funding the CAP -
- Deepening extending the EC competencies beyond
existing policies to include - A system of foreign policy cooperation (Etienne
Davignon report) - Coordination of member states monetary
policies to secure farm prices from parity
fluctuations (Pierre Werner report on the EMU) - Enlargement launch of negotiations conditional
to the enforcement of the new financing system
for CAP
17Compromise
The five commitment to resolve the regulations for funding the CAP by the end of the year French consent for enlargement negotiations to begin by June 1970
18Outcomes Completion
- A new funding system for the CAP
- positive EC own resource (amendment to the
Treaty of Rome agreed by the foreign ministers
subject to member states ratification) - Levies on agricultural products
- duties on imported industrial goods
- up to 1 per cent of VAT revenue
- - negative - the mechanism of the agreement
disadvantages member states importing on a big
scale from outside of the EU
19Outcomes Deepening
- Davignons report (May 1970 / October 1970)
- European Political Cooperation
- Brandt agenda for EPC
- Europe wide support for his Ostpolitik policy
- Werner s plan for EMU the blueprint for
achieving the Economic and Monetary Union - Increased coordination of domestic economic
policies at European level to promote convergence
- Institutional reform
- Fixing of exchange rates and adoption of a single
currency by 1980
20Outcomes Deepening
- March 1971 Ecofin Council Resolution on attaining
the EMU - Member states commitment on the exchange rate
fluctuation margin within 1,2 percent band - Snake proved unworkable due to dollar instability
in 1971 - Relaunch of the snake in the tunnel in 1972
2,25 band - The UK, Ireland, Denmark and Italy withdrawal
from the system in 1973 in the wake of the oil
crisis and economic recession
21Outcomes Enlargement
- June 1970 accession negotiations with
Britain, Ireland, Denmark and Norway begin in
Luxembourg
22Positions The UK
- Edward Heath approach to gain entry, then sort
out any differences - Edward Heath conservative party skepticism
- Harold Wilson opposition in the Labor
- Pompidou welcome of the British traditional
Euroskepticism - Heaths and Pompidou accord French - British
axis? - Labor denunciation of Heaths entry terms despite
George Thomsons claim that they would have been
accepted by the Labor governement
23within the UK
- The grass roots of the strength of
opposition to European commitment which has
existed, and continues to exist, at all levels of
British society - fear of being boxed into the Continental system
- fear of sovereignty cession
- concern on abandonment of its unique position of
being both independent and universal, committed
to none and having a hand in the shaping of all
24Causes of ambivalence
- The British response to the growth of European
movement was schizophrenic - Welcome of the steps to overcome age-old European
rivalries - Reflecting that the divide and rule policy was at
stake, Britain will not be able to hold the
balance of power in Western Europe - Awareness that the new European power can
undermine the UK influence in the world - Robert Skidelsky The Choice for Europe
25Hence
- The British policy
- of selective sabotage and finally decision to
stop the thrust of unity from inside Americas
Trojan Horse in Europe - Political argument for
- Britain has always been a European power.
Today European powers are coming together in
political union. Britain can no longer stop it.
To stand outside would be to cut itself off for
the first time from the Continent of which it has
always been a part. This would be a betrayal of
Englands past and the real guarantee that it
would have no future. - Robert Skidelsky The Choice for Europe
26A series of referendums
- France - April 1972 to split the Communist
Socialist opposition 61 vote for - Ireland May 1972 83 vote for
- Norway September 1972 53,5 vote against
- Denmark September 1972 63 vote in favor
27The UKParliamentary approval in October 1972
- Five days debate in the Parliament culminating in
the vote taken on October 28 - Labor dissidents performing the divine duty of
making a judgment and then courageously applying
the judgment by voting for Europe (69 20
abstaining) - Roy Hattersley Voting for Europe
28A Historic Decision Speech to the House of
Commons by Edward Heath
- Economic and political arguments
- Change in the international trade relations
- US increasing economic connections with the new
powers China, SU, EEC - Commonwealth developing into a loose association
of independent countries - Economic and social benefits of the common market
- Resilience of the Community and its effective
mechanisms of dealing with the problems arising
29Economic and political arguments cont.
- Making a commitment which involves our
sovereignty, we are also gaining an opportunity.
We are making a commitment to the Community as it
exists tonight, if the House so decides, but we
are gaining the opportunity to influence the
decisions of the future. - Being a member of the community would be an
effective use of our contribution of
sovereignty. - Britain, which will be united to Europe
economically, will be able to influence decisions
affecting her future and enjoy better standard of
life.
30The EC of the Nine in 1973
- Britain, Ireland, Denmark join the EC
- The member states of the Community, the driving
force of European construction, affirm their
intention before the end of the present decade to
transform the whole complex of their relations
into a European Union. - October 19-20, 1972, Paris summit concluding
statement
31External and domestic pressures, diversity of
national agendas and Euroslump
- The collapse of the postwar fixed exchange rate
mechanism - August 1971 Nixons statement on suspension of
dollar convertibility and imposition of
restrictive trade measures - European economies slipping into recession
- Need for a concerted anti inflationary action and
coordinated policy for exchange rate stability
accepted in the Paris summit
32Positions/Preferences
- Brandt
- Opposing the European Regional Development Fund
(ERDF) - Advocating float of the currency
- Pompidou
- Concerned with the impact of the currency
fluctuations on the CAP - Opposing a joint float
- Support of the ERDF
- Heath
- ERDF financial assistance for depressed regions
in the UK
33December, 1973, Copenhagen summit
- Continued inflation
- Worsening of oil crises onset of embargo in
Rotterdam - Need of a common energy policy and a concerted
response to the oil crisis - EC Common position on the Middle East causing
further transatlantic tensions - EC US Trade disputes
- Kissingers call for a new Atlantic Charter and a
coordinated Western response to the oil crisis
34Positions/Preferences
- Pompidou
- Opposing Kissingers initiative
- Advocating bilateral consumer producer bargains
on concrete supply issues - UN stage for the multilateral negotiations on the
general political and economic differences - Brandt
- Support of the US position
- Continued Ostpolitik
- Treaties with the SU, Wasaw, Prague
- Agreement on Berlin
- Accord between two Germanies
- Opposition to the ERDF
- Heath
- Blocking discussions on energy to get a deal on
the ERDF
351974
- France - election of Giscard dEstaing
- Germany Brandts resignation and Helmut Schmidt
becoming the Chancellor - The UK Wilsons reelection
- Reestablishment of the French German axis
- Renegotiation of British accession agreement
terms
36April 1974 Council meeting
- James Callaghan voices the UK demands of the
Labor Party manifesto - Recalculation of the UK budgetary contribution
- CAP reform
- Commonwealth interests protection
37November 1974
- Schmidts speech in the Labor party conference
We need the British - My party feels that the advantages of the
EEC so far do have greater weight than the
stresses and the burdens. After all it is an
organization, whose pace and direction can only
be decided by the agreement of all members. We
feel that it provides us with the necessary means
of cooperation which we do need to solve the
problems of the present day crisis of the world
economic structure.
38April 1975
- The House of Commons approval of the
governments recommendation that Britain should
stay in the European Community 396 to 170 votes
split - Three pamphlets to each voter referendum campaign
- 1975 referendum 67 vote in favor of staying
39December 1974 Paris summit
- Schmidt brokerage between the British and
French leaders - Agreement on the ERDF (UK getting the 28)
- Correcting mechanism decision
- Decision to hold direct elections to the European
Parliament - Decision to hold regular summits of the European
council as a forum for directing EC affairs
40March 1975 Dublin summit
- Agreement on the British rebate negotiated
41Consequences of the corrective mechanism hidden
flaw
- Conditional to overall deficit of the member
state balance of trade - November 1979, Dublin summit, Margaret Thatcher
demanding British money back - June 1984, Fontainebleau meeting of the European
Council, abatement agreement - Abatement
- Calculated on the basis of the difference
between the British share of community
expenditure and the proportion of the Community
VAT-based revenue contributed by the UK - Paid in the form of a reduced VAT contribution
in the following year
42The stagflation period
- The large member states failure to provide
leadership - Germany strong economically, but not politically
- France, depressed economically and politically
volatile - The UK, weak politically and economically
- Privileged partnership impatience with the
Commission contribution to its dysfunctionalism - Europe can only be brought forward by the
will of a few statesmen, and not by thousands of
regulations and hundreds of ministerial councils - Inefficiency of the Brussels institutions
- The Council indecisiveness lack of political
will to revive European integration - Leo Tindemans reports (1975) on ways to advance
European integration (two speed Europe) - The three wise men (Barend Biesheuvel, Edmund
Dell, Robert Marjolin) Report on European
Institutions (1979)
43Lecture 6 Transformation of the European
Community (1979-1989)
- The second and third Enlargements (Greece, 1979,
Spain and Portugal, 1986). - The Budgetary issues.
- The crisis in the Community.
- The Single European Act (1986).
44Readings for the lecture
- Dinan Desmond (1999) Ever Closer Union. An
Introduction to European Integration. Second
edition. The European Union Series. Palgrave.
Chapter 4 and Chapter 5 -
- Thatcher M. A Family of Nations (1988). The
European Union. Readings on the Theory and
Practice of European Integration, Nelsen B.F. and
Alexander C G. Stubb (eds.), Palgrave, 1998 -
- Delors J. A Necessary Union (1989). The European
Union. Readings on the Theory and Practice of
European Integration, Nelsen B.F. and Alexander C
G. Stubb (eds.), Palgrave, 1998
45Readings for the lecture
- Robert O. Keohane and Stanley Hoffmann
Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s in
The new European Community. Decision-making and
Institutional Change, Robert O. Keohane and
Stanley Hoffmann (eds), 1991, Westview press. -
- Moravcsik A. Negotiating the Single European Act
National Interest and Conventional Statecraft in
the European Community (1991). The European
Union. Readings on the Theory and Practice of
European Integration, Nelsen B.F. and Alexander C
G. Stubb (eds.), Palgrave, 1998.
46