Economic arguments for trade protection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Economic arguments for trade protection

Description:

Economic arguments for trade protection Applied International Trade Analysis Lecture 4 * * Departure from free trade has theoretical justification in following cases ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Comp537
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economic arguments for trade protection


1
Economic arguments for trade protection
  • Applied International Trade Analysis
  • Lecture 4

2
  • Departure from free trade has theoretical
    justification in following cases
  • Terms of trade argument
  • Optimal tariff rate argument
  • Infant-industry argument
  • Product market distortion
  • Factor market distortion
  • Gandolfo 1994 135-143

3
OFFER CURVE
  • The locus of the combination of a countrys
    imports and exports
  • How much is a country willing to export for a
    quantity of imports at a given international
    price

4
Derivation of the offer curve
Y
Q
U0
U1
U2
Q
R
p
p
p
p
X
0
5
Offer curve (tariff on x)
I1
I0
T
W
Y
E
R
R
0
X
6
TERMS OF TRADE ARGUMENT
  • Figure 1 Free trade equilibria and terms of
    trade

7
  • Figure 2 Tariff and terms of trade

8
Imposing a TARIFF by country 2 yields
  • Offer curve of a country 2 shifts downwards (from
    G2 to G2)
  • Terms of trade of country 2 increase
    (tariff-levying country needs to export less of
    good A for the imports of good B than before)
  • Volume of trade contracts (imports of country 1
    reduces from EB to EB, imports of country 2
    reduces from EA to EA) and
  • Terms of trade of country 1 deteriorate (country
    2 improves its welfare on the account of country
    1).

9
OPTIMAL TARIFF RATE ARGUMENT
  • Figure 3 Optimal tariff rate

10
  • Maximizing own welfare by imposing an optimal
    tariff leads to
  • retaliation by the other country
  • possible tariff war
  • trade reduction
  • both countries are worse off comparative to free
    trade
  • Imposing an optimal tariff pays off only if
    tariff-levying country has some monopoly power
    (large country)

11
Figure 4 Maximizing welfare by using an optimal
tariff
welfare
Tariff rate
12
  • In principle, by imposing a tariff a country can
    improve its welfare, but only up to the certain
    point (C), where
  • foreign country retaliates
  • home welfare starts to contract
  • A tariff war can lead trade to cease completely,
    which results in a lower welfare of the home
    country relative to the free trade

13
INFANT-INDUSTRY ARGUMENT
  • The oldest theoretical argument for protection
  • Two conditions have to be satisfied in order to
    justify this argument
  • home firms in the protected industry have to
    develop gradually until they are ready to compete
    internationally (at world prices) and
  • if the infant industry has been wisely chosen,
    the gains from trade in the sheltered industry
    after protection has been abandoned have to more
    than compensate for the losses the country had to
    suffer under previous protection.

14
SUMMARY
  • in principle, tariff protection can raise
    domestic sectors
  • however, losses under tariffs are higher than
    losses suffered under production subsidies given
    to import-competing sectors
  • tariff protection does not necessarily make a
    country to become a net exporter of the protected
    goods

15
Figure 5 Infant-industry argument and choice of
the optimal trade measure
16
SUMMARY
  • using a subsidy instead of a tariff effects in
    lower losses (consumption is less reduced)
  • in the long run, country remains net importer of
    the protected goods if consumer preferences are
    biased towards this good
  • country has neglected development of the
    comparative-advantage sector

17
PRODUCT MARKET DISTORTIONS
  • Product prices can be distorted due to
  • monopoly of individual firms results in product
    prices exceeding respective marginal cost, or
  • external dis/economies of scale lead to
    differences between marginal cost of individual
    producers and social marginal cost (no tangent
    solution anymore).
  • Consequences
  • free trade leads to specialization in the wrong
    direction
  • Solution
  • product subsidy

18
Figure 6 Distorted relative product prices and
specialization in the wrong direction
19
  • PROBLEM
  • free trade leads to specialization in the wrong
    direction
  • SOLUTION
  • imposing a product subsidy is superior to tariff
    as it results in lower welfare losses

20
FACTOR MARKET DISTORTION
  • Factor prices can be distorted due to
  • factor prices differ from their respective
    marginal productivities or
  • factor prices are not equalized across sectors
  • PROBLEM
  • country produces at the suboptimal transformation
    curve

21
  • Two key issues
  • how to get to the optimal production and
    consumption equilibria on the distorted
    transformation curve
  • by imposing a production subsidy or tax to
    producers
  • how to get to the optimal production and
    consumption equilibria on the optimal
    transformation curve
  • by imposing a production subsidy or tax to
    production factors

22
Figure 7 Distorted factor prices and 2-step
solution
23
  • PROBLEM
  • distorted factor prices lead to production at the
    suboptimal transformation curve
  • 2-STEP SOLUTION
  • production subsidy/tax to producers leads to
    optimal production and consumption equilibria on
    the distorted transformation curve
  • production subsidy/tax to individual production
    factors leads to optimal production and
    consumption equilibria on the optimal
    transformation curve.

24
NONECONOMIC MOTIVES FOR PROTECTION
  • Noneconomic motives may prevail over economic
    ones in designing trade policy
  • NATIONAL DEFENSE of certain strategic sectors
    (military, agriculture, shipping)
  • NATIONAL PRIDE, certain goods raise specific
    sentiments in individual countries and justify
    use of different trade measures in order to
    preserve its production notwithstanding the
    price
  • FOREIGN POLICY OBJECTIVES (such as U.S. embargo
    of Libya or Cuba) often justify use of different
    trade measures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com