Title: Case Study 1 Styner/Lauder Intersection Moscow, Idaho
1Case Study 1Styner/Lauder IntersectionMoscow,
Idaho
2Problem Should the intersection of U.S. 95 and
Styner/Lauder be converted from two way stop
control to signal control?
Overview
- Learning skills
- Apply HCM analysis procedures for interrupted
flow facilities. - Know common input requirements and default
values. - Select an appropriate analysis procedure
- Understand HCM analysis limitations
- Know how to reasonably interpret the results
3Introduction
- Moscows population is about 21,000
- U.S. 95 is the primary north-south state highway
in Idaho - ADT on U.S. 95 is between 15,000 and 23,000 vpd
- Average annual traffic growth is about two
percent per year
4Introduction
5Introduction
SH 8
US 95
Sweet
Lauder
Styner
6Introduction
- What issues do you think should be considered by
the state's traffic engineer in resolving this
problem?
- City residents have asserted that increasing
traffic volumes at the intersections of Styner
Avenue, Lauder Avenue, and U.S. 95 are increasing
delays for and reducing the safety of motorists
traveling through the intersection. - The city has requested that the Idaho
Transportation Department signalize the
intersection. -
- What issues do you think should be considered by
the state's traffic engineer in resolving this
problem?
7Issues to consider
Getting Started
- Scope of the analysis?
- Stakeholders?
- Goals?
- Performance measures?
- Tools?
- Data?
- Technical Issues?
8Questions to be Answered
Problem 1 U.S. 95/Styner-Lauder Avenue
- What is the level of service at the existing TWSC
intersection at U.S. 95/Styner-Lauder? - What would the level of service be if the
intersection were signal controlled? - What would the level of service be at the
intersection under future projected traffic
conditions?
9Analyses to be Undertaken
Problem 1 U.S. 95/Styner-Lauder Avenue
- Sub-problem 1a. Analysis of the existing TWSC
intersection - Sub-problem 1b. Analysis of the proposed
signalized intersection - Sub-problem 1c. Analysis of future conditions
10Step 1. Setup analysis of existing TWSC
Sub-Problem 1a Analysis of existing TWSC
intersection
- Which tool or tools from the HCM should be used
for the analysis of a TWSC intersection? - What data are required for the analysis?
- What default values should be used?
- What time periods should be analyzed?
- What measure should be used to determine the
performance of the intersection? - What other factors should be considered?
11Sub-Problem 1a Analysis of existing TWSC
intersection
US 95
Lauder
Styner
12Step 2. Results
Sub-Problem 1a Analysis of existing TWSC
intersection
13Step 2. Results (cont.)
Sub-Problem 1a Analysis of existing TWSC
intersection
14Step 2. Results (cont.)
Sub-Problem 1a Analysis of existing TWSC
intersection
Intersection delay and LOS?
15Step 1. Setup analysis of signal control
Sub-Problem 1b Analysis of proposed signalized
intersection
- Which tool or tools should be used for this
analysis? - What data are required for the analysis?
- What default values should be used?
- What time periods should be analyzed?
- How do we construct a signal timing for a
proposed traffic signal using the HCM?
16Step 2. Results
Sub-Problem 1b Analysis of proposed signalized
intersection
17Step 1. Setup analysis of future conditions
Sub-Problem 1c Analysis of future conditions
- What is the appropriate future year for this
analysis? - Which default values should be used for this
future analysis? - What other factors should be considered?
18Step 2. Results for TWSC control
Sub-Problem 1c Analysis of future conditions
19Step 2. Results for signal control
Sub-Problem 1c Analysis of future conditions
20What if our volume assumptions are uncertain?
Sub-Problem 1c Analysis of future conditions
21Graphical presentation of results
Sub-Problem 1c Analysis of future conditions
22Graphical presentation of results
Sub-Problem 1c Analysis of future conditions
23Problem 1 Analysis
24Problem 1 Discussion
25End of Problem 1