Title: Trade Facilitation
1Trade Facilitation
- WTO Doha Round South Asia
- Linking Civil Society with Trade Negotiations
Sanath Jayanetti Institute of Policy Studies
2Outline
- Background Definitions
- Identification of trade facilitation needs and
priorities - Costs and benefits of trade facilitation measures
- Historical evolution in the GATT/WTO
- Clarification of GATT Articles
- Special Differential Treatment
- Negotiating Positions
3Background Definitions
- Today we have,
- Ever higher volumes of trade due to
globalization, FDI, MNCs looking for cheapest
inputs for their finished products in different
locations, plethora of FTAs - Traders are demanding faster clearance for their
goods and increased administrative efficiency
Trade velocity modern supply chain management
techniques have increased the usage of just-in
time manufacturing, global production sharing
and outsourcing
4Background Definitions (cont.)
- Trade Facilitation the plumbing
- Cutting red tape at the border
- Reducing all transactions costs associated with
enforcement, regulation and administration of
trade policies (trade and tariff policy also
plays a major role in trade facilitation) - Involves simplification, harmonization and
rationalization of trade procedures - Can be achieved through automation, applying
modern risk analysis techniques, transport
procedures, etc.
5Background Definitions (cont.)
Source Trade Facilitation from a Developing
Country Perspective, National Board of Trade,
Sweden, 2003
6Background Definitions (cont.)
- Organizations that deal with trade facilitation
- World Customs Organization (WCO)
- UN Agencies such as United Nations Conference on
Trade Development (UNCTAD), United Nations
Center for Trade Facilitation Electronic
Business (UN/CEFACT), United Nations Economic
Commission for Europe (UN/ECE), United Nations
Commission on International Trade Law
(UNCITRAL) - IMF, WB
- World Trade Organization (WTO), etc.
7Identification of trade facilitation needs and
priorities
- Need for
- Transparency of methods and procedures
- Avoid delays of border crossings
- No corruption
- Packaging and labeling requirements
- Similar national standards
- Facilitating physical movement of consignments
(more relevant for land-locked countries) - Creation of more efficient payment and credit
arrangements - Liberalization of exchange control, relaxation of
stringent requirements on formalities on
payments, insurance and other financial
requirements
8Identification of trade facilitation needs and
priorities (cont.)
- A key feature of SAARC economic cooperation.
Already established, - Group on Customs Cooperation
- Group on Harmonization of Standards and
Measurements - Framework Agreement on SAFTA (Jan 2004) has made
provision for trade facilitation measures under
Article 8 (Additional Measures). Some of measures
are - Harmonization of standards
- Simplification and harmonization of customs
clearance procedure - Harmonization of national customs classification
based on HS coding system - Customs cooperation to resolve dispute at customs
entry points - Transit facilities for efficient intra-SAARC
trade, especially for landlocked contracting
states etc. - The political will to implement trade
facilitation measures seem to be lacking in the
region.
9Colombo Port Containers moving out
10Costs and benefits of trade facilitation measures
- Benefits
- Shortening of waiting time for goods in transit,
customs release and clearance - Reduction of trade transaction costs for traders,
especially for SMEs - Improved revenue collection and effectiveness of
border controls - A more transparent and efficient regulatory
climate for investors - Improvement of efficiency morale and integrity of
customs agencies - Improved relations between authorities involved
in border control related activities and the
business/trading community - Better functioning of public agencies and a more
reliable basis for implementation of government
policy
11Costs and benefits of trade facilitation measures
(cont.)
- Costs
- Substantial initial investment, varies according
to the level of reforms needed and existing
infrastructure. But, considerable improvement can
be made within the existing framework w/o
incurring heavy capital investments through,
inter-alia - Synchronized business timings at borders
- Customs procedures simplification and
standardization - Harmonization of trade documents
- Joint customs operations
- Simplification of transit trade
12Costs and benefits of trade facilitation measures
South Asia (cont.)
- Article V
- Problems with transit facilities between
Bangladesh, India and Nepal - Article VIII
- Bangladesh - Average 12 days to clear a cargo
load, can take up to 30days for imported goods to
be released through customs Hidden cost ranges
from Tk. 4,700 to Tk 86,800. - India - Exporter needs to obtain 258 signatures,
make 118 copies of documents and wait for long
hours. - Nepal - For customs clearance 83 types of
documents have to be filled with 102 copies and
113 signature The human resource requirements
for completing the customs procedure is estimated
to be 22 days. - Pakistan - There is a long circuitous road to get
consignment into the country. - Sri Lanka - There are a number of charges on
imports. - Article X
- In general, No known inquiry points, no
consultative mechanism and appeal process.
Difficulty in accessing information. - Source Wickramasinghe, Upali A multilateral
Approach to Trade Facilitation in South Asia,
SAWTEE
13Costs and benefits of trade facilitation measures
case study
- The flow of activities from clearing a shipment
to returning the empty container Sri Lanka - 1.Clearing the shipment at the port (late
morning/afternoon) - 2.Transportation of shipment to destination
(afternoon) - 3.De-stuffing at destination (afternoon)
- 4.Return of empty container and truck to trucking
yard (by this time office hours have ended)
extra charge after office hours - 5.Overnight parking of the container and truck at
trucking yard - 6.Return of empty container to assigned area of
the shipping line (following day morning) - 7.Return of the truck to port to attend to
another shipment (following day late
morning/afternoon) - Issues
- The empty container is not returned on the same
day due to high rates charged for empty
containers returned after office hours. - Practical difficulties in making lodging a
request - Difficult to arrive at an accurate prediction of
expected time of return of the empty container to
the shipping line. - Even if above difficulty was to overcome, there
exists a high possibility that this time
indication is known after office hours, which
hinders lodging a request for after office
return. - Additional Cost on transportation due to double
shuttling involved in above point 4 and 6. - Delay in commencing a new clearance of a shipment
in the following day
14Historical evolution of Trade Facilitation (TF)
in the GATT/WTO
- Relevant GATT Articles WTO Agreements include
- GATT Article V (Freedom of Transit)
- GATT Article VII (Valuation for Customs Purposes)
- GATT Article VIII (Fees and Formalities connected
with importation and exportation) - GATT Article IX (Marks of origin)
- GATT Article X ( Publication and Administration
of Trade Regulations)
15Historical evolution of TF in the GATT/WTO (cont.)
- Agreement of Implementation of Article VII of
GATT 1994 (Customs Valuation Agreement) - Agreement on Import licensing Procedures
- Agreement on Pre-shipment Inspection
- Agreement on Rules of Origin
- Agreement on technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)
- Application of Sanitory and Phytosanitory
Measures (SPS) - GATS and TRIPS also include some trade
facilitation measures. GATT Article XXIV (Customs
Unions and Free Trade Areas) would also affect
trade facilitation.
16Clarification of GATT Articles
- Article V freedom of transit of goods through
the most convenient route, no unnecessary delays
and restrictions, no levies (such as customs
duties) only for services provided - Article VIII fees charged for import and export
must be limited to cost of services, minimize the
incidence and complexity of import and export
formalities, need for decreasing and simplifying
import export documentation requirements - Article X prompt publication of laws,
regulations and decisions relating to import and
export, laws relating to trade must be
administered in uniform, impartial and reasonable
manner and there must be provision for judicial
review of administrative decisions
17Articles V, VIII X Core Principles
- Transparency
- Consistency and predictability
- Non-discrimination
- Simplification and avoidance of unnecessary
restrictiveness, and - Due process
18Historical evolution of TF in the GATT/WTO (cont.)
- Trade Facilitation (TF) was added to the WTO
agenda in Dec 1996, Singapore Ministerial
Declaration (para 21) directed the Council of
Trade in Goods (CTG) to undertake exploratory
and analytical work, drawing on the work of other
relevant organizations, on the simplification of
trade procedures in order to assess the scope for
WTO rules in this area. - ?Became one of the four Singapore issues
19Historical evolution of TF in the GATT/WTO (cont.)
- 1997-1999, CTG collected information. Several
seminars were held. For the 1999 WTO Ministerial
in Seattle, several members (EU, Japan and US)
made official submissions to WTO to launch
negotiations on TF as part of new WTO Round.
Meeting was unable to agree on a new agenda for
the Seattle Round. - 2001 WTO Ministerial in Doha, attempts were made
to include TF in the agenda for the new Round of
negotiations. But no consensus.
20Historical evolution of TF in the GATT/WTO (cont.)
- Doha Ministerial Declaration states that In
the period until the Fifth Sessions, the Council
for Trade in Goods shall review and as
appropriate, clarify and improve relevant aspects
of Articles V, VIII and X of GATT 1994 and
identify the trade facilitation needs and
priorities of members, in particular developing
and least-developed countries. We commit
ourselves to ensuring adequate technical
assistance and support for capacity building in
this area.
21Historical evolution of TF in the GATT/WTO (cont.)
- Work program concentrated on three main areas
- GATT Articles V, VIII, and X
- TF needs and priorities of member countries
Especially of developing and LDCs - Technical Assistance and Capacity Building
-
- Developing countries were of the view that they
prefer TF measures to be handled autonomously and
the need to address the implications of binding
rules and human and financial resources, as well
as difference in level of developments.
22Historical evolution of TF in the GATT/WTO (cont.)
- Cancun Ministerial 2003, no declaration,
Ministerial Statement. - Doha Ministerial Declaration and the WTO General
Council Decision of July 2004 (July Package)
constitute the combined framework of current
negotiations. (Doha Work Program, Decision
Adopted by the General Council on 1 August 2004
WT/L/579) - In the July Package it was decided to start
negotiation for an agreement in the area of TF
and drop the other three Singapore issues from
the Doha negotiations.
23Historical evolution of TF in the GATT/WTO (cont.)
- Modalities were given in Annex D of the July
Package. Key issues are - Clarification and improvement of relevant aspects
of Articles V, VIII and X of the GATT 1994
enhancement of technical assistance and support
for capacity building effective cooperation
between customs or any other appropriate
authorities on trade facilitation and customs
compliance issues (para 1) - Special and differential treatment for developing
and LDCs (para 2) - LDC members commitments not mandatory (para 3)
- Identification of trade facilitation needs and
priorities concerns related to cost implications
of proposed measures (para 4) - Technical assistance and support for capacity
building (paras 5, 6 and 7) - Working with and work of relevant international
organizations (paras 8 and 9). - Since the July Package three meetings have been
held of the Negotiating Group of TF at the WTO.
(Last one on 7,9 Feb 2005)
24Special Differential Treatment (SDT)
- Developing and LDCs institutional improvements
would require, in addition to very high costs,
sustained effort over a long period, and
countries at different stages of development have
different needs, priorities, and capacities to
implement global rules. - Under Doha Development Agenda the work program
on SDT is set out in Para 44 of Ministerial
Declaration. - SDT under the July Package With regards to the
level of development and needs of developing
countries, SDT will be an important part of
negotiations Proportionality to be achieved
through lesser commitments by developing
countries.
25Special Differential Treatment (SDT) cont.
- Almost the entirety of Annex D of the July
Package Modalities for Negotiations on Trade
Facilitation is on making use of the SDT
provision for developing and LDC countries.
Proper implementation is the key issue. - The extent and timing of entering into
commitments shall be related to the
implementation capacities of developing and LDCs - LDCs are required to undertake commitments
subject to their limitations - Address the cost implications for developing and
LDCs of the proposed measures - TA support to the developing and LDCs to be
provided by developed countries - If infrastructure support is not forthcoming
implementation is not required - Collaborative effort to be undertaken with IMF,
OECD, UNCTAD,WCO and the WB.
26Negotiating Positions as at 02/05
- At the third meeting (since the July Package) of
the WTO Negotiating Group on Trade Facilitation
on 7 and 9 February - Developing countries and their groupings raised
the issue whether any agreement arising from the
negotiations should be legally binding or instead
be based on a system of incentives, and stressed
that developing countries could only implement
commitments if they have the resources to do so,
as agreed to in the text on trade facilitation. - Developed countries submitted papers that gave
specific proposals on new obligations that WTO
members should undertake on various aspects of
trade facilitation. These proposals were met
with great caution by several developing
countries. - Source TWN Report by Goh Chien Yen
27Negotiating Positions as at 02/05
- Some of the issues raised by the Core Group (19
developing countries) - what legal commitments if any will a new
agreement entail." - "it will have to be discussed, whether the
components of an agreement on trade facilitation
will lead to dispute resolution or rules based
commitments of compelled reforms or a more
general incentives based reform commitment
process that recognizes the large resources and
lengthy timeframe involved." - "the specific task and challenge of this
Negotiating Group is to make a concrete list of
the specific components and criteria for
promoting trade facilitation..., while keeping in
mind that these negotiations are in the context
of the Doha Development Round and are limited in
scope to reviewing and clarifying GATT Articles
V, VIII and X."
28Negotiating Positions as at 02/05
- African Group stated that
- Scope of negotiations is only limited to Articles
V, VIII, X of GATT. - SDT is a key principle in Annex D.
- As per para 3 of Annex D, it will "provide LDCs
the basis for not undertaking commitments that
are not compatible with their development,
financial or trade needs or their administrative
and institutional capabilities." - On para 4, "In this regard, we believe the
provision of externally-sourced resources to
support such review and identification of TF
needs and priorities is essential. Further, a
study on the needs and priorities of African
countries, including flexibilities and costs of
adjustment, must be conducted." - Provision of TA and capacity building is a must
for African countries to implement the results of
the negotiations.
29Negotiating Positions Proposals as at 02/05
Developed Member Country Proposal for
European Community and its member states Clarifications and improvements to GATT Article X (Publication and administration to Trade Regulations). (TN/TF/W/6)
South Korea Clarification of Article X of the GATT Publication and availability of Information and prior commenting period on core measures. (TN/TF/W/7)
Japan, Mongolia, and the separate customs territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu Trade facilitation Proposals to clarify and improve GATT Article X. (TN/TF/W/8)
Communication from Canada Possible commitments on advance rulings (TN/TF/W/9)
Separate Customs territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu Trade Facilitation Some possible measures to improve GATT Articles VIII and X. (TN/TF/W/10)
USA Introduction to proposals (TN/TF/W/11)
USA Advance binding rulings (TN/TF/W/12)
USA Transparency and Publication (TN/TF/W/13)
USA Fees (TN/TF/W/14)
USA Express Shipments (TN/TF/W/15)
30Negotiating Positions as at 02/05
- Members agree to "clarify and improve relevant
aspects of Articles V , VIII and X of the GATT
1994 with a view to further expediting the
movement, release and clearance of goods,
including goods in transit," - EC
- publish and make easily available all laws,
procedures, and rules affecting imports, exports
and goods in transit. - Above information to be available in a simple
accessible manner. - When new rules are introduced members should
notify WTO. - Wants private sector be consulted before having
new or amended rules (expansion of Article X). - Members be obliged to provide legal right of
appeal against customs and other agency rulings
and decisions.
31Negotiating Positions as at 02/05
- USA, Canada
- Under Article X, members commit themselves to
provide binding advance rulings on tariff
classification when requested by traders to do
so. - USA
- internet publication of customs rules and
procedures - to "establish specific parameters for fees
charged by Members under Article VIII GATT 1994
and publish such fees on the internet and notify
the WTO with a specified number of days in
advance of implementation"Â and - the need to "provide specific expedited
procedures for express shipments."
32Negotiating Positions as at 02/05
- Taiwan, Korea Japan
- To have an one-stop information center
- Korea
- Members should be provided with opportunities to
make comments on the new rules and procedures
introduced by members - Sri Lanka
- Has made several statements in support agreeing
to modalities of negotiations in Cancun based on
the Annex G of the draft Ministerial Text. Cost
and implementation of the proposals submitted so
far is the main issue.
33Thank you