Law of Sentencing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Law of Sentencing

Description:

Audrius Stonkus * * * * * * * Historical Perspective The common forms of punishment in ancient communities included: (1) capital punishment (over time, capital ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: stonk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Law of Sentencing


1
Law of Sentencing
  • Audrius Stonkus

2
Historical Perspective
  • The common forms of punishment in ancient
    communities included
  • (1) capital punishment (over time, capital
    punishment has taken many forms stoning,
    throwing the offender off a cliff, burning at the
    stake, crucifixion, being buried alive, being
    hanged (dragged, quartered, entrailed), the
    guillotine, electrocution, gas chamber, etc.)
  • (2) physical mutilation (e.g., cutting the hand
    off of a thief, or cutting off a tongue or ear,
    or branding)
  • (3) corporal punishment (e.g., whipping, torture
    etc.)
  • (4) confiscation of property
  • (5) exile (as an alternative to capital
    punishment)
  • (6) loss of civil status
  • (7) forced labour (e.g., working in the salt
    mines or in the galley of a boat or forced to
    participate in gladiatorial combat)
  • (8) prison was usually only used to hold persons
    awaiting trial or execution, or for debtors
  • (9) public shaming or denunciation was used for
    minor offences.

3
Canadian perspective
  • The BNA Act s. 91(28) also assigned
    responsibility to the federal government for
    establishing and maintaining "penitentiaries" and
    s. 92(6) assigned responsibility for local jails
    and reformatories to the provinces.
  • Capital punishment (hanging) was officially
    abolished in 1975, but the last hanging to occur
    in Canada was in 1962. New rules for parole
    ineligibility were set for murder -- no parole
    eligibility for 25 years, subject to a "faint
    hope clause" application to a jury after 15 years
    to reduce parole eligibility to something less
    than 25 years.
  • Throughout the 20th century, imprisonment
    remained as the primary sentencing response to
    crime, although fines and probations gained some
    ground during the course of the twentieth century.

4
Softer or More Realistic?
  • The "Changing Focus of Punishment" from the 18th
    to the 21st centuries is summarized as follows
  • At the end of the eighteenth century, most
    sentences were directed at the body of the
    offender either in the form of execution or
    mutilation.
  • Exclusion was also a dominant feature, achieved
    through transportation, banishment, and civil
    disability.
  • The birth of the penitentiary provided a change
    in course, to stipulated periods of deprived
    liberty during which, optimistically, some
    reformative process would take place.
  • Initially, the engines of reformation were
    thought to be penitence, discipline, and hard
    labour.
  • Later, the rehabilitative ideal replaced these
    regimes with psychological, vocational, and
    education programs.

5
Recent Changes
  • In the twentieth century, various factors
    produced a renewed interest in fines and the new
    sanction, probation.
  • Now, at the beginning of the twenty-first
    century, we are in the midst of a debate about
    the overuse of imprisonment and the continuing
    search for non-custodial alternatives.
  • Factors like rapidly expanding costs of
    imprisonment, the enthusiasm for restorative
    justice, and dissatisfaction about the state of
    criminal justice in aboriginal communities
    combine to encourage new community-based
    alternatives with a large role for members of the
    community, both as contracted service providers
    and volunteers.

6
  • Sentencing (imposition of punishment) often
    follows immediately after conviction. There may,
    though, be a delay--either for the defence to
    prepare its arguments, or for a pre-sentence
    report by a probation officer.

7
Discharges
  • Even if a court finds you guilty of an offence,
    under some circumstances it might not convict
    you, but instead might give an absolute or
    conditional "discharge". This means there will be
    no punishment, and you will not have a criminal
    record as such (although the discharge itself is
    recorded).
  • The conditions that may be part of a conditional
    discharge can include things like the payment of
    restitution for damages, or counselling. The
    conditions will be imposed through a probation
    order. If these conditions are not kept, the
    discharge can be revoked, and a conviction
    entered after all.
  • A discharge is not possible if there is a minimum
    penalty for the offence, as with impaired
    driving, or if the maximum punishment for the
    offence is 14 years or more in jail.
  • To grant a discharge, the judge must be convinced
    it is in the best interests of the accused, and
    is not contrary to the public interest.
  • If a discharge is not granted, and a conviction
    entered instead, the sentence can be a money
    fine, a period of probation, a term of
    imprisonment, or a combination of these
    punishments. A fine will usually have a surcharge
    added on top of it, that is supposed to go into a
    fund for compensation of victims.

8
Probation
  • The judge may "suspend" sentence while you follow
    a programme of probation.
  • If this is not properly completed, the suspended
    (more severe) sentence can then be imposed
    s.738.
  • The terms that can be included in such a
    probation order are set out in the Criminal Code
    s.737.

9
Restitution
  • There may also be an order for "restitution"--that
    is, you must make a payment to someone who has
    suffered loss because of your criminal acts
    s.725.

10
Aggravating and Mitigating Factors
  • Aggravating factors increase the severity of
    the sentence
  • Mitigating factors decrease the severity of the
    sentence

11
Aggravating Factors
  • Aggravating
  • -offence motivated by bias, prejudice or hate
  • -abuse of the offenders spouse or child during
    the commission of an offence
  • -abuse of a position of trust while committing an
    offence
  • -involvement of organized crime in the offence

12
Mitigating Factors
  • -offender pleaded guilty
  • -offender has provided restitution to
    (compensated) the victim
  • -offender has good character references
  • -offender has limited or no previous criminal
    record
  • -age of the offender (very young or very old)

13
Speaking to Sentence
  • If you plead guilty, or are convicted after a
    trial, you will have a chance to tell the judge
    about anything you think should make the sentence
    lighter. This will be done for you by your
    lawyer, if you have one, or you can speak for
    yourself. The most important things to
    concentrate on, after you've given the judge a
    brief personal background with details of your
    age and education, family, home and work
    situation, etc., are
  • personal factors that should cause the judge to
    be more sympathetic towards you, such as poor
    health or other difficulties
  • personal circumstances or achievements that show
    you are a good citizen, like schooling, job,
    family attachments, volunteer work, courses or
    counselling taken, etc.
  • circumstances surrounding the offence that make
    what you did less blameworthy, or at least more
    understandable
  • facts that make your situation unique, so that a
    heavy penalty is not needed to act as a general
    deterrent against crime in society
  • any reason why a particular sentence might be
    especially hard on you--for instance, why you
    would find it difficult to pay a fine, or why a
    jail sentence would cause family hardship
  • your feelings about the offence, that show you
    are unlikely to do it again, so that a harsh
    punishment is not necessary for your own
    deterrence.
  • Most importantly, if there were circumstances
    that made you act the way you did, if you regret
    doing so, and/or do not intend to do so again,
    make sure the judge knows all that. For most
    offences, the judge has a lot of discretion in
    how big a sentence to impose, and a serious,
    respectful and apologetic attitude on your part
    will go a long way towards getting him or her to
    be lenient.

14
Tools Used by the Courts to Determine Appropriate
Sentences
  • Pre-sentence report by probation officer who
    investigates and reports on many issues including
    offenders age, maturity, character, behaviour,
    attitude and willingness to make amends s. 721
    (3)
  • Victim impact statement which is an account by
    the victim or a relative describing the negative
    effects of the crime on their lives

15
Tools Used by the Courts to Determine Appropriate
Sentences
  • Evidence including witnesses statements
  • Convicted persons statements
  • Criminal record of the offender
  • Defence and Crown submissions (arguments about
    the sentence)

16
Most Common Sentences Involving Incarceration
  • Concurrent Sentence
  • The sentence of the different crimes may be
    served at the same time
  • Consecutive Sentence
  • If the accused is convicted of more than one
    crime not related to each other, then the
    sentences may run one after the other

17
Most Common Sentences Involving Incarceration
  • Intermittent Sentence
  • To help a convict maintain a job or finish
    schooling, the fail time for some crimes may be
    served on weekends and evenings.
  • Indeterminate Sentence
  • Criminals classified as dangerous offenders get
    sentences of indefinite length that could last
    their lifetime.

18
Most Common Sentences Involving Incarceration
  • Capital Punishment
  • The death penalty was revoked in Canada in the
    1960s
  • Conditional Release
  • Often criminals do not serve their entire
    sentence in prison

19
Type Reasons/Conditions Time
Day parole To prepare for full parole or statutory release at the discretion of the national Parole Board (NPB) parolee returns to an institution at night 6 months before full parole after one-sixth of sentence for first-time non-violent convicts
Full parole To prepare for full parole or statutory release at the discretion of the national Parole Board (NPB) conditions attached to the offenders release Usually after the lesser of one-third of sentence or seven years
Statutory release To prepare for reintegration while being supervised by a parole officer If the offender is not on parole then for most crimes the law requires the convict to be released before the end of the sentence not for lifers or those serving an indeterminate sentence Usually after two-thirds of sentence.
20
Custodial Sentences - Jail /Prison/ The Slammer
/The Big house/ The Pokey
  • Sentences of two years or more are served in
    federal penitentiaries- shorter sentences are
    served in provincial detention centers.
  • This is why you sometimes see sentences of two
    years less a day.
  • Normally a convict will serve the last 1/3 of his
    sentence on parole- parole may allow him to be
    supervised while out of custody so as to better
    integrate back into society.

21
Speaking to Sentence
  • If you plead guilty, or are convicted after a
    trial, you will have a chance to tell the judge
    about anything you think should make the sentence
    lighter. This will be done for you by your
    lawyer, if you have one, or you can speak for
    yourself. The most important things to
    concentrate on, after you've given the judge a
    brief personal background with details of your
    age and education, family, home and work
    situation, etc., are
  • personal factors that should cause the judge to
    be more sympathetic towards you, such as poor
    health or other difficulties
  • personal circumstances or achievements that show
    you are a good citizen, like schooling, job,
    family attachments, volunteer work, courses or
    counselling taken, etc.
  • circumstances surrounding the offence that make
    what you did less blameworthy, or at least more
    understandable
  • facts that make your situation unique, so that a
    heavy penalty is not needed to act as a general
    deterrent against crime in society
  • any reason why a particular sentence might be
    especially hard on you--for instance, why you
    would find it difficult to pay a fine, or why a
    jail sentence would cause family hardship
  • your feelings about the offence, that show you
    are unlikely to do it again, so that a harsh
    punishment is not necessary for your own
    deterrence.
  • Most importantly, if there were circumstances
    that made you act the way you did, if you regret
    doing so, and/or do not intend to do so again,
    make sure the judge knows all that. For most
    offences, the judge has a lot of discretion in
    how big a sentence to impose, and a serious,
    respectful and apologetic attitude on your part
    will go a long way towards getting him or her to
    be lenient.

22
Recent changes to sentencing Law,
diversion/alternative measures
  • In September, 1996, the part of the Criminal Code
    dealing with sentencing was completely
    re-written, and one of the big changes was a
    clear statement that judges should avoid giving
    jail time, if at all possible.
  • Another change made official what has long been
    done in the "Diversion" programme. For minor
    first offences, where the accused person admits
    what he or she has done, and wants to make
    amends, the whole thing can sometimes be dealt
    with outside the regular justice system.
  • If you are in this situation, and are willing to
    take responsibility for whatever you have done
    (and avoid a criminal record), it might be worth
    asking the prosecutor's office if they are
    willing to consider Diversion (officially called
    Alternative Measures). This would usually be done
    after the first appearance in court.
  • If the Crown is willing, there will be an
    interview with whichever group is responsible for
    the programme in your province, and if they too
    approve, a contract will have to be signed.
  • The contract acknowledges the harm that you have
    done, and sets out what you will do to make up
    for it, often by some form of community work.
  • Once the contract is signed, the Crown normally
    enters a stay of the charge against you, so that
    you do not have to appear in court any more.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com