Title: Comprehensive Agriculture Support Programme (CASP)
1CASP
- Comprehensive Agriculture Support Programme
(CASP) - Portfolio Committee presentation
- Department of Agriculture
- 2004
2 Part 1
3Aim of CASP
- To enhance the provision of support services to
promote and facilitate agricultural development
targeting beneficiaries of the Land Reform and
Agrarian Reforms programmes.
4CASP and Policy Reform
- Policy documents providing the policy framework
for CASP - The White Paper on Agriculture (1995)
- The White Paper on Land Reform (1995)
- The Reconstruction and Development programme
- The BATAT Strategy (1995)
- The Strauss Commission Report (1996)
- The Land and Agriculture Development Programme
(1998) - Skills Development Act
- National Skills Development Strategy
5Policy Reforms
- Deregulation of the agricultural product
marketing - Changes in fiscal treatment of Agriculture
- Abolition of certain tax concessions
- Reduction in the direct budgetary expenditure on
the sector - The land reform, restitution and redistribution
- Trade policy reforms and general liberalisation
of agric trade - Institutional reforms, esp. the three tiers of
Gov involved in Agriculture - Changes in the mandate of the Land bank
- Repeal of the Agricultural Credit Act
6Strategies to put policy reforms into practice
- Integrated Sustainable Rural Development Strategy
(ISRDS) - The Land Redistribution for Agricultural
Development sub-programme (LRAD) - Integrated Food Security and Nutrition (IFSNP)
- The National Landcare programme
- Agriculture Sector Strategy
- Comprehensive African Agriculture Development
Programme (CAADP) - Knowledge and Information systems (KIMS)
7The need for CASP
- Inspite of strategies and policies, agricultural
support services have been inadequate, hence CASP - CASP flows from the recommendations of the
Strauss Commission report, which recommended - The financial sunrise subsidies to establish
financing mechanisms - The adoption of a sunrise package of enabling
conditions for the beneficiaries of land reform
to streamline and align service delivery within
the three tiers of government - Identified as a priority within the
intergovernmental fiscal review process focusing
on service delivery.
8CASP model
Agricultural macro- system within consumer
economic environment
Farm Business level activity
Household food security Subsistence
The Hungry Vulnerable
Agriculture support
6 pillars
Technical advisory assistance
Marketing Business Development
Training Capacity building
Information Knowledge management
On off farm infrastructure
Financial assistance
9CASP beneficiaries
1. The Hungry Vulnerable
Though this group is primarily the
responsibility of the Department of Social
Development, they are supported by the DoA and
PDAs through advice and during food emergencies
and crises through the agricultural food packs
and for those families who are ready, the
introduction of agriculture starter pack (Block 1)
10CASP beneficiaries (cont)
2. Subsistence Household Food Producers
Supported through food production and include
the beneficiaries of the Special Programme on
Food Security (SPFS) and the Integrated Food
Nutrition Programme (IFSNP) where the provision
of the agriculture starter pack is made. (Block 2)
11CASP beneficiaries (cont)
3. Farmers
Supported through farm level support and include
beneficiaries of the LRAD and other strategic
programmes, e.g. SLAG, Restitution,
Redistribution, Tenure reform. (Block 3)
12CASP beneficiaries (cont)
4. Agricultural macro-system within the consumer
environment
This category includes the agri-business and
entrepreneurs to ensure that business and
regulatory environment is conducive to support
agricultural development and food safety. (Block
4)
136 priority areas of CASP
- Information and Knowledge Management
- Technical and Advisory Assistance, and Regulatory
Services - Training and Capacity building
- Marketing and Business Development
- On-Farm and off-Farm Infrastructure and
Production inputs - Financial assistance
14Roleplayers
- CASP will be implemented through partnering
between - Department of Agriculture
- Provincial Departments of Agriculture
- Department of Land Affairs
- National Treasury through the Intergovernmental
Fiscal Review - District committee and council
- The Beneficiaries
- Banking Institutions The Land Bank
- Sector Education and Training Authorities
- Other Partners
15Intergovernmental Fiscal Review Process
- Formation of 10x10 and 4x4
- 4x4 joint technical committee set up to
establish greater coordination on policy
development and budgeting for functions that are
a joint responsibility of national and provincial
governments. Reports to - 10x10 sectoral committee of DoA and National
Treasury - Technical team prioritised CASP
- Identifies spending pressures cost drivers
- Developed templates to identify targets and
budget for MTEF
16CASP Expected Outcomes
- Increased creation of wealth in agriculture and
rural areas - Increased sustainable employment
- Increased incomes and increased foreign exchange
earnings - Reduced poverty and inequalities in land and
enterprise ownership - Improved farming efficiency
- Improved national and household food security
- Stable and safe rural communities, reduced levels
of crime and violence, and sustained rural
development - Improved investor confidence leading to increased
domestic and foreign investment in agricultural
activities and rural areas - Pride and dignity in agriculture as an occupation
and sector
17CASP implementation strategy
- Three-pronged strategy of
- Aligning support services related to
- Information and knowledge
- Technical and advisory services,
- Training and capacity building,
- Marketing and business development,
- Phasing in basic support services related to
- On farm and off farm infrastructure, agricultural
inputs, marketing and business development. - Policy for agricultural financing
18Aligning support services
- Done through the
- Intergovernmental Fiscal Review
- MTEF
- Treasury guidelines for measuring service
delivery - Setting norms and standards and monitoring
systems - Working group has been formed to align extension,
information, advisory services, training
19Phasing in basic support services
- Following priorities have been agreed upon
- Fencing
- Water for household food security and food
production - Dipping services
- Stock handling facilities
- Next phase to prioritise production inputs,
mechanisation and marketing and business
development
20Financing strategy
- Presidents SONA announced re-establishment of
the ACS - Currently the Department is in the process of
examining the design and will shortly determine a
date for public debate - Invite finance team to make presentation
21 Part 2
22Land and Agrarian Reform
Integrated Food Security and Nutrition Programme
Agro processing Industries
Household Food Production Programmes
Comprehensive Agricultural Support Programme
Viable Farming Enterprises
Land Redistribution for Agricultural Development
Where it is agricultural land
Agro Tourism Strategy
Water Resources Strategy
Restitution Programme Tenure Reform Programme
23Budget
- An allocation of R 750 million has been made
through the MTEF and implemented through the
Division of Revenue Act (DORA) - R 200 million for 2004
- R250 million for 2005
- R300 million for 2006
24Budget allocation (2004/05) per province
Province Allocated amount
Eastern Cape R 38 043 000
KwaZulu-Natal R 37 016 000
Limpopo R 33 428 000
North West R 26 875 000
Mpumalanga R 18 903 000
Free State R 16 870 000
Western Cape R 13 765 000
Northern Cape R 10 518 000
Gauteng R 4 582 000
25Work in progress
- Phased in basic support services (fencing, water,
dipping and stock handling) - Finalising guidelines for mechanisation,
agricultural inputs, marketing and business
development. - Continue alignment through Intergovernmental
Fiscal Review to populate the template with
budget pressure points as they relate to research
extension services, training and capacity
building information and advisory services and
regulatory services. - Finalise the financing mechanisms for
agricultural support in CASP - Finalise monitoring and reporting systems as per
agreed within DORA
26The implementation challenges
- Working with the provinces within the context
of concurrency resulted in backlog in
implementation of projects on the ground and
utilization - Limited resources need to prioritise
Restitution Beneficiaries, LRAD beneficiaries
Communal areas and resource limited black farmers
in general - Focus in year one on and off farm
infrastructure - Demand exceeds supply
- Implications of other land reform programmes
sustainability
27Next steps
- Implementation of the Agricultural Research and
Extension support services - Alignment of CASP deliverables with other Land
and Agrarian Reform Programmes - Alignment of CASP with IFSNP
- Alignment of CASP with the Financing Strategy
- Preparing projects for submission for financial
year 2005/06 as prioritized by Provinces focused
on the other pillars - Presented CASP as priority at MTEC and awaiting
outcome - Community mobilization for ownership of projects