Title: ESRC Funded Seminar Series
1 ESRC Funded Seminar Series Public Policy,
Equality and Diversity in the Context of
Devolution Seminar 1 Universal Principles of
Equality Implications for Different
Groups Jointly sponsored by the ESRC and
the Northern Ireland Equality Commission
2- Opening Comments
- Linda McKie, Glasgow Caledonian University
-
- Sheila Riddell, University of Edinburgh
3Public Policy, Equality and Diversity
- From equalities bodies or a single equalities
body, incorporating a human rights commission - Equality strands gender, race, disability,
sexual orientation, age and religion - Mainstreaming
- Equalities throughout the processes of
development implementation - Potential for a generic approach to equality
4Aims of the Seminar Series
- Nature implementation of mainstreaming
- Context of devolved governments in UK and wider
contexts - National local organisations individuals
working across bodies and policies - A single equalities body
- Implications for groups and policies
- Legislative policy challenges
5Aims continued.
- Engages with the concerns of academics,
practitioners, policy-makers and equality
activists - Build research infrastructure in the field of
equalities - Promote awareness of research, policy and
practice issues in the context of devolution
6Seminar 1 Universal Principles of Equality
- Equality of condition
- Groups Disabled, children, religions
- Bodies to body drawing across the equality
strands - Discussants
- Networks and outputs
7Equality Policies the importance of equality of
condition Kathleen Lynch Centre for Equality
Studies, University College Dublin
8Mainstreaming Equality Theories Towards a
Generic Model of Discrimination Sally
Witcher University of Edinburgh
9The starting point
- Mainstreaming equality means the
incorporation of Equal Opportunities issues into
all actions, programmes and policies from the
outset BUT - Are issues/ barriers the same for all groups?
- Do interests of groups conflict?
- Separate academic study of different groups
- Competing accounts within study of each
10The case for a generic approach
- Recognised that in any group members will have
multiple characteristics - Engaging with other perspectives could enable a
more holistic, comprehensive appreciation of
discrimination/ inequality - Theoretical level understanding may help avoid
mistakes based on superficial evidence
11Defining discrimination
- A matter of identifying differences can be
positive or negative - Process by which people are allocated to social
categories with unequal rights, power, resources,
etc - Differential treatment of classes of people
- Needs to be morally justifiable and legally
permissible
12Defining oppression
- Inhuman Degrading treatment
- Negative demeaning exercise of power zero sum
- Social positions linked to values, attributes
- norm of the homogenous public the fate of
unassimilated persons
13Implications
- Discrimination as process error?
- Oppression an outcome of process error or a
cause of it? - The negative, serious, impact of power on the
powerless - Repression of characteristics, limiting of
potential, reshaping of behaviours - Material disadvantage, poverty
14Themes from the group-based literatures
- Social categorisation
- Socio-cultural/ political context
- Biological and genetic explanations
- The psychology of identity and behaviour
- Systems and interactive processes
15Social categorisation
- Is it intrinsically discriminatory and
oppressive? - Queer theory rejects categorisation
- Essentialist
- Race distinctions not naturally given
- Universalising disability
- But practicalities, equitable treatment?
16Socio-cultural context
- Eurocentrism, androcentrism, ethnocentrism
- Capitalism
- Institutional discrimination
- The social model
17Biological and genetic explanations
- Medical disease, unhealthy behaviours
- Race attempts to show genetic inferiority
- Gender intersex interventions, biological role,
behaviours - The search for the gay gene
- The medical model
18The psychology of identity and behaviour
- Socialisation, social learning, identification
theory (gender) - Systems/ Transactional model how interactions
can reinforce behaviours (disability) - Biopsychosocial model physical limitations
filtered through beliefs expectations
19Systems and interactive processes
- Identity as performative
- doing gender
- Interactive model (disability)
- The interface between individual and their
environment and systems through which it occurs - 3 sites for adjustment?
20Towards a generic framework
- Themes largely compatible, mutually reinforcing
new insights - Consistent with discrimination as process error
- Criteria, etc set ? access ? assessment ?
categorisation ? allocation/ delivery - Deliberate/ not deliberate direct/ indirect
levels institutional, personal
21Implications for mainstreaming equality
- Involvement of external stakeholders
- Deconstruction of processes
- Training for assessors
- Focus on group commonalities and individual
uniqueness - Reshaping oppressive/ liberating potential?
- Positive action historical/ psychological
disadvantage
22Conclusion
- To bring together the group-based literatures
poses new questions and reveals fresh
perspectives to apply to each. Although it cannot
answer every question, a generic model begins to
take shape through which to rethink identity and
action to remove barriers for everyone
experiencing discrimination and oppression
23Ensuring Equality of Religion Belief New
Challenges John Brewer University of Aberdeen
24Children and the Equalities Agenda Anne
Stafford University of Edinburgh
25 Policy Discussant Saheema Rawat, Equality
Challenge Unit
26Working Across the Equality Strands Lessons from
Experience Evelyn Collins Equality Commission
for Northern Ireland
27 Policy Discussant Niall Crowley, Equality
Authority Ireland Academic Discussant Yvonne
Galligan, Queens University Belfast
28Close Sheila Riddell University of Edinburgh