FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION

Description:

FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION Prepared for: Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and Aeronautical Systems Center PURPOSE FOR MIP AND PDB ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Gove67
Learn more at: https://clu-in.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION


1
FORMER AIR FORCE PLANT 36BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • Prepared for
  • Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence and
    Aeronautical Systems Center

2
PURPOSE FOR MIP AND PDB TECHNOLOGY
  • Characterize lateral/vertical extent of cl-VOCs
    in soil and ground water
  • Evaluate vertical distribution of cl-VOCs in
    ground water
  • Provide real-time data on lithology and
    contaminant distribution

3
HISTORY AND STATUS OFCORRECTIVE ACTION AT GEAE
  • GEAE buys AFP 36 in 1989
  • Corrective action begins in 1990
  • Numerous investigations/interim measures
    performed
  • Approximately 150 monitoring wells on/off site
  • TCE and TCA in ground water remaining corrective
    measure
  • Investigate source of TCE/TCA at AF Plant 36

4
(No Transcript)
5
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • Determine Source of TCE/TCA in groundwater
  • 1. Sampling Design
  • 2. Sampling Locations
  • 3. Methodology
  • MIP Survey
  • 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3)
  • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)
  • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)
  • Direct Push Results
  • 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7)
  • 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9)
  • 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)
  • Groundwater Monitoring Results
  • Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig. 3.1-13)

6
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • MIP Survey
  • 1. Sampling Design
  • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)
  • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

7
(No Transcript)
8
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • MIP Survey
  • 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3)
  • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)
  • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

9
(No Transcript)
10
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • MIP Survey
  • 1. Sensor and Detector Outputs (Fig. 2.2-3)
  • 2. Sampling Area (Fig. 3.1-2)
  • 3. EC and ECD Results (Fig. 3.1-3)

11
(No Transcript)
12
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • Direct Push Results
  • 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7)
  • 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9)
  • 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)

13
(No Transcript)
14
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • Direct Push Results
  • 1. Soil (Fig. 3.1-7)
  • 2. Groundwater (Fig. 3.1-9)
  • 3. MIP/Direct Push Comparison (Fig. 3.1-11)

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
  • Groundwater Monitoring Results
  • Passive Diffusion Bag Results (Fig. 3.1-13)

18
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com