Binaural hearing and spatialization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Binaural hearing and spatialization

Description:

Binaural hearing and spatialization Perfecto Herrera Psicoac stica La natura ha prove t l sser hum amb una llengua, per amb dues orelles, de manera tal que ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Perfecto3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Binaural hearing and spatialization


1
Binaural hearing and spatialization
  • Perfecto Herrera
  • Psicoacústica

2
  • La natura ha proveït lésser humà amb una
    llengua, però amb dues orelles, de manera tal que
    pugui escoltar dues vegades més que parlar
  • Zenó

3
Why 2 ears?
  • Locating sounds in space acuity is poorer than
    in vision by up to two orders of magnitude, but
    extends in all directions. Role in alerting and
    orienting?
  • Separating sound sources signals from 2
    receivers can be compared and operated on to
    enhance the reception of one sound source over
    another. The same applies to signals in a
    reverberant environment.
  • Definitions
  • Monaural Sound presented to one ear
  • Binaural Sound presented to both ears
  • Diotic Sounds identical at the two ears
  • Dichotic Sounds different at the two ears
  • Azimuth position in the left-right axis
  • Elevation position in the up-down axis
  • Blauert, J. (1997). Spatial Hearing The
    Psychophysics of Human Hearing. Cambridge, MA
    MIT Press.

4
Localisation in 3 dimensions
  • Azimuth (left/right)
  • (Arab. as-sumut, i.e. as al the sumut, pl of
    samt way)
  • Binaural cues Interaural Time Differences and
    Interaural Level Differences
  • Lateralization is a simplified localisation
    (placement in the head)
  • Median-plane (front, up, back, down)
  • Pinna-induced spectral cues
  • Head movements
  • Distance
  • Absolute level, Inverse-square law (intensity
    decreases 6dB each time we double the distance),
    spectral balance, reverberation

5
Anatomy of the auditory system
6
Interaural Level Difference (ILD)
From David McAlpine
Processed in Lateral Superior Olive
7
(No Transcript)
8
ILD is greater for higher frequencies
Interaural level differences calculated for a
source in the horizontal plane. The source is at
an azimuth q of 10 (green curve), 45 (red), or
90 (blue) relative to straight ahead. The
calculations assume that the ears are at opposite
poles of a rigid sphere.
9
Interaural Time Difference (ITD)
From David McAlpine
Processed in Medial Superior Olive
10
Interaural time-difference - ITD
t R
t L
ITD t R - t L
Maximum c 0.6 ms
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Phase Ambiguity
This particular case is not a problem since max
ITD 0.6 ms But for frequencies above 1500 Hz it
IS a problem
14
Phase Ambiguity
Both possible times are less than the maximum ITD
of 0.6 ms
15
Raleighs Duplex theoryfor pure tones
  • Low frequency pure tones (lt1500 Hz) localised by
    interaural time differences
  • High frequency pure tones localised by intensity
    differences

16
Raleighs Duplex theoryfor pure tones (2)
  • 1. Low frequency tones (lt1500 Hz) localised by
    phase differences
  • Very small interaural intensity difference for
    low-frequency tones.
  • Phase locking present for low frequency tones
    (lt4kHz).

17
Raleighs Duplex theoryfor pure tones (2)
  • 1. Low frequency tones (lt1500 Hz) localised by
    phase differences
  • Phase locking present for low frequency tones
    (lt4kHz).
  • Limited by phase ambiguity Maximum ITD 670 µs
    corresponding to a whole cycle at 1500 Hz (the
    upper limit for binaural phase sensitivity)

18
Raleighs Duplex theoryfor pure tones (3)
  • High (and close low) frequency tones localised by
    intensity differences
  • Shadow cast by head greater at high (20 dB at 6
    kHz) than low frequencies (3 dB at 500 Hz) i.e.
    head acts as a lowpass filter.
  • For close sounds (lt1.5m) the inverse square law
    gives intensity differences between the ears for
    all frequencies. These differences vary with
    azimuth independently of any head-shadow effect.
    Beyond 1.5m the difference in level between the
    ears due to this factor is less than 1 dB.

19
(No Transcript)
20
Pinna notch
21
Head-Related Transfer Functions
22
(No Transcript)
23
Precedence (or Haas) effect
Reflections arriving in the 0-40ms range are
linked to the direct sound source Longer delays
are detached from the direct sound source and
considered echoes
24
Applications of the precedence effect
25
Perception of distance
  • More distant sounds are
  • Quieter (inverse-square law)
  • More muffled (high frequencies dont travel so
    well)
  • More reverberant (direct is quieter relative to
    reflected)

For very close sounds, the difference in distance
from the source to the two ears becomes
significant -gt excess IID from inverse-square law.
26
Perception of distance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com