Chapter 4 More on Directed Proof and Proof by Contrapositive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 4 More on Directed Proof and Proof by Contrapositive

Description:

Chapter 4 More on Directed Proof and Proof by Contrapositive 4.1 Proofs Involving Divisibility of Integers 4.2 Proofs Involving Congruence of Integers – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Amy8157
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 4 More on Directed Proof and Proof by Contrapositive


1
Chapter 4 More on Directed Proof and Proof by
Contrapositive
  • 4.1 Proofs Involving Divisibility of Integers
  • 4.2 Proofs Involving Congruence of Integers
  • 4.3 Proofs Involving Real Numbers
  • 4.4 Proofs Involving sets
  • 4.5 Fundamental Properties of Set Operations
  • 4.6 Proofs Involving Cartesian Products of Sets

2
Section 4.1 Proofs Involving Divisibility of
Integers
  • In general, for integers a and b with a?0, we say
    that a divides b if there is an integer c such
    that bac. In this case, we write a b.
  • If a b, then we also say that b is a multiple
    of a and that a is a divisor of b. If a does not
    divide b, then we write a b.?
  • Result Let a, b, and c be integers with a?0 and
    b ?0. If ab and bc, then ac.
  • Proof. Assume that ab and bc. Then bax and
    cby, where x, y?Z. Therefore, cby(ax)ya(xy).
    Since xy ?Z, ac.

3
Examples
  • Result Let a, b, c, x, y ?Z, where a?0. If ab
    and ac, then a(bxcy).
  • Exercise.
  • Result Let x, y ?Z, If 3 xy, then 3 x and 3
    y.
  • Proof Assume that 3 x or 3 y. WLOG, assume
    that 3 divides x. Then x3z for some integer z.
    Hence xy(3z)y3(zy). Since zy is an integer, 3
    xy.



4
Examples
  • Let x ?Z. If 3 (x2-1), then 3 x.
  • Proof. Assume that 3 x. Then either x3q1 for
    some integer q, or x3q 2 for some integer q. We
    consider these two cases.
  • Case 1. x 3q1 for some integer q. Then
  • x2-1(3q1)2-13(3q22q).
  • Since 3q22q is an integer, 3 x2-1.
  • Case 2. x3q2 for some integer q. Then
  • x2-1(3q2)2-13(3q24q1).
  • Since 3q24q1 is an integer, 3 x2-1.


5
Section 4.2 Proofs Involving Congruence of
Integers
  • For integers a, b, and n2, we say that a is
    congruent to b modulo n, written a?? b (mod n),
    if n (a-b).
  • For example 15?7 (mod 4) since 4 (15-7),
  • but 14 4 (mod 6) since
    6 (14-4). ?
  • Note that since every integer can be expressed
    as x2q or as x2q1 for some integer q, it
    follows that either 2(x-0) or 2(x-1) that is,
  • x ? 0 (mod 2) or x ? 1 (mod 2).
  • Similarly, we have x ? 0(mod 3), x ? 1(mod 3), or
    x ? 2(mod 3).
  • Etc.

6
Examples
  • Result Let a, b , k, and b be integers, where
    n2. If a ? b (mod n), then ka ? kb (mod n).
  • Proof Assume that a ? b(mod n). Then n (a-b).
    Hence a-b nx for some integer x. Therefore,
  • ka-kbk(a-b)k(nx)n(kx).
  • Since kx is an integer, n (ka-kb) and so ka ?
    kb (mod n).



7
Examples
  • Result Let a, b, c, d, n ?Z, where n 2. If a ?
    b (mod n) and c ? d (mod n), the ac ? bd (mod
    n).
  • Proof Exercise.

8
Examples
  • Let n ? Z. If n2 n (mod 3), then n 0(mod 3)
    and n 1(mod 3).
  • Proof. Let n be an integer such that n ? 0 (mod
    3) or n ? 1(mod 3). We consider these two cases.
  • Case 1. n ? 0(mod 3). Then n3k for some integer
    k. Hence
  • n2-n(3k)2-(3k)3(3k2-k).
  • Since 3k2-k is an integer, 3 n2-n. Thus n2 ? n
    (mod 3).
  • Case 2. n ? 1(mod 3). Then n3x1 for some
    integer x. Hence
  • n2-n(3x1)2-(3x1)3(3x2x).
  • Since 3x2-x is an integer, 3 n2-n and so n2 ? n
    (mod 3).



9
Section 4.3 Proofs Involving Real Numbers
  • Some facts about real numbers that can be used
    without justification.
  • a20 for every real number a.
  • an0 for every real number a if n is a positive
    even integer.
  • If alt0 and n is a positive odd integer, then
    anlt0.
  • If the product of two real numbers is positive if
    and only if both numbers are positive or both are
    negative.
  • If the product of two real numbers is 0, then at
    least one of these numbers is 0.
  • Let a, b, c ?R. If a b and c 0, then ac bc.
  • Indeed, if cgt0, then a/c b/c.
  • If agtb and cgt0, then acgtbc and a/cgtb/c.
  • If agtb and clt0, then acltbc and a/cltb/c.

10
Theorem
  • Theorem If x and y are real numbers such that
    xy0, then x0 or y0.
  • Proof. Assume that xy0. We consider two cases,
    x0 or x?0.
  • Case 1. x0. Then we have the desired result.
  • Case 2. x ?0. Multiplying xy0 by the number 1/x,
    we obtain
  • 1/x(xy)1/x(0)0. Since 1/x(xy) ((1/x)x)yy, it
    follows that y0.

  • .
  • Result Let x ?R. if x5-3x42x3-x24x-1 0, then
    x 0.
  • Proof. Assume that xlt0. Then x5lt0, 2x3lt0, and
    4xlt0. In addition,
  • -3x4lt0, -x2lt0. Thus x5-3x42x3-x24x-1lt0-1lt0, as
    desired.


11
Examples
  • Result. If x, y ?R, then 1/3x23/4y2 xy.
  • Proof. Since (2x-3y)2 0, it follows that
    4x2-12xy9y2 0 and so
  • 4x29y2 12xy.
  • Dividing this inequality by 12, we obtain
    1/3x23/4y2 xy.



12
Section 4.4 Proofs Involving sets
  • Recall, for set A and B contained in some
    universal set U,
  • A?? Bx x ? A
    or x ? B.
  • A? ? Bx x ? A and x ? B.
  • A - Bx x ? A and x ? B.
  • To show the equality of two sets C and D, we can
    verify the two sets inclusions C?D and D ?C.
  • To establish the inclusion C ?D, we show that
    every element of C is also an element of D that
    is, if x ? C then x ?D.

13
Examples
  • Result. For every two sets A and B, A-BA ?
  • Proof. First we show that A-B ?A ? . Let x
    ?A and x??B. Since x? B, it follows that x ? .
    Therefore, x ?A and x ? so x ? A ? . Hence
    A-B ?A ? .
  • Next we show that A ? ?A- B. Let y ? A ? .
    Then y ? A and y ?
  • . Since y ? , we see that y? B. Now because y
    ? A and y ? B, we conclude that y ? A- B. Thus, A
    ? ?A-B.


14
Examples
  • Result. Let A and B be sets. Then A?B A if and
    only if B ?A.
  • Proof. First we prove that if A?B A, then B ?A.
    We use a proof by contrapositive. Assume that B
    is not a subset of A. Then there must be some
    element x ?B such that x ?A. Since x ?B, it
    follows that x ?A ?B. However, since x ?A, we
    have A ?B?A.
  • Next we prove the converse, namely, if B ? A,
    then A ?BA. We use a direct proof here. Assume
    that B ? A. To verify that A?B A, we show that A
    ? A?B and A?B ?A. The set inclusion A ? A?B is
    immediate. It remains only to show then that A?B
    ?A. Let y ?A ?B. Thus y ?A or y ?B. If y ?A, then
    we already have the desired result. If y ?B, then
    since B ? A, it follows that y ?A. Thus A?B ? A.


  • .
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com