Early Academic Intervention - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Early Academic Intervention

Description:

Early Academic Intervention Do Young Gifted Children Benefit ? High Public Interest Discussed even in daily newspapers Especially for at-risk and minority children ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:160
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: zinserNo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Early Academic Intervention


1
Early Academic Intervention
Do Young Gifted Children Benefit ?
2
High Public Interest
  • Discussed even in daily newspapers
  • Especially for at-risk and minority children
  • High enrollment in enrichment programs (Language
    Stars, Kumon etc.)

3
Early identification
  • Educators generally in favor (McBride, 1992)
  • Nurture at home independent of ID (Colangelo,
    1986 Tannenbaum, 1992)
  • Danger of being labeled (Freeman, 1995)
  • Early Identification not reliable (Ziegler, 2004)

Identified children on the gifted track can be
under pressure to perform
4
Early is the ideal time...
  • Stimuli work best with children under 5
    (Tannenbaum, 1992)
  • Earlier entry better performance (Field, 1991)
  • Children discouraged from learning may hide their
    talents (Whitmore, 1986 Barbour, 1992)
  • Early school entry gives confidence children
    know the drill (Sylva, 1994)

5
Later is better ...
  • Loss of childhood (Elkind, 1981)
  • Children need free time to incorporate learned
    content (Elkind, 1988a)
  • Formal schooling quenches creativity (Meador,
    1992)
  • If early then child-centered (Stipek, 1995)

6
Conclusion - or what is best?
  • Early academics for gifted children must be
    child-centered / flexible
  • Gifted children learn early to value and use
    their talents
  • Nurturing and supporting environment more
    important than being or not being in a preschool

7
References
  • Barbour, N. B. (1992). Early Childhood Gifted
    Education A Collaborative Perspective. Journal
    for the Education of the Gifted, 15(2), 145-162.
  • Colangelo, N., Fleuridas, C. (1986). The
    Abdication of Childhood. Journal of Counseling
    and Development, 64, 561-563.
  • Elkind, D. (1981) The Hurried Child Growing up
    too Fast too Soon. Cambridge, MAPerseus
    Publishing
  • Elkind, D. (1988a). Our President Acceleration.
    Young Children, 43(4)
  • Field, T. (1991). Quality Infant Day Care and
    Grade School Behavior and Performance. Child
    Development, 62, 863-870.
  • Freeman, J. (1995).Annotation Recent Studies of
    Giftedness in Children. Journal of Child
    Psychology Psychiatry, 36(4), 531-547.

8
References II
  • McBride, N. (1992). Early Identification of the
    Gifted and Talented Students Where Do Teachers
    Stand? Gifted Education International, 8, 19-22.
  • Meador, K.S. (1992). Emerging Rainbows. Journal
    for the Education of the Gifted 15(2)
  • Stipek, D. et al. (1995). Effects of different
    approaches on Young Children's Achievement and
    Motivation. Child Development 66(1)
  • Sylva, K. (1994). School influences on Childrens
    Development. Journal of Child Psychology and
    Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 36, 135-170.
  • Tannenbaum, A. (1992). Early Signs of Giftedness.
    Norwood, NJ Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Whitmore. (1986). Intellectual Giftedness in
    Young Children. New York Waworth.
  • Ziegler, A. (2004). Stabilität von Intelligenz
    und Hochbegabung im Vorschulalter. LVH aktuell,
    13.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com