Title: Is Indeni the best option for Zambia
1Is Indeni the best option for Zambias Fuel
Supply?
2Overview
- Fuel Costs vs Taxes vs Prices
- Why are costs so high?
- Role of Government
- TAZAMA / Indeni not competitive dependent on
tariff protection - Costs security risks of relying solely on
TAZAMA / Indeni - Case for liberalisation / import of finished
products by OMCs
3Zambian Fuel Costs are the highest in the region
(and probably in Africa)
Southern Africa Comparative Diesel Prices, June
2008
Diesel / Gasoil (US / litre) Botswana Malawi Mozam Namibia RSA Swaziland Tanzania Zambia
Product Basic Cost 1.19 0.96 1.05 1.04 1.04 0.99 1.05 1.48
Transport, Service Differential 0.08 0.22 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.09
Govt. levies, duties, taxes 0.06 0.34 0.16 0.19 0.24 0.26 0.44 0.55
Oil Company margin (rounded) 0.05 0.08 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.11
Dealer Margin 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.05 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.07
Retail Pump Price 1.44 1.67 1.43 1.34 1.42 1.37 1.63 2.30
Source BP
4Southern Africa Comparative Diesel Prices, June
2008
5To reduce pump prices, in 2008 GRZ cut excise duty
- petrol from 60 to 36
- diesel from 30 to 7
6Despite tax cuts, Zambian fuel prices are still
among the highest in Africa
Retail Prices of Diesel in SSA in February 2010
(in US per litre)
Source World Bank
7Pump prices must be reduced by cutting costs, not
taxes
- Taxes are transfer payments from citizens to
government - Cutting taxes on fuel requires increasing them on
something else (or less expenditure) - The drop in GRZ fuel revenue from 2.7 of GDP in
2008 to 1.4 in 2009 meant lower expenditure /
increased fiscal deficit
8Q. Why are costs so high in Zambia?
- Answer - Inefficiencies in
- Feedstock Procurement to Dar es Salaam
- TAZAMA pipeline (?) no data
- Indeni refinery
- Distribution
- Monopoly
- Role of Government
9n
Components of Value Chain
TAZAMA Pipelines 1706 km
Undersea Pipeline
Ship Tanker at SPM Dar-es-Salaam
TAZAMA Tank Farm Dar-es-Salaam
INDENI Refinery
Oil Rig
Industry
Mining
Road/Air Transport
Ndola Fuel Terminal
OMC
Hauliers
Filling Station
Agriculture
10Government is main operator in Zambian fuel
market
- Procures / owns feedstock
- Owns 2/3 of TAZAMA (1/3 Tanzania Govt)
- Owns Indeni
- Wholesale supplier to OMCs
- GRZ also regulates the industry and fixes prices
- conflict of interest?
- ERB subject to political interference (eg 2008/09)
11Feedstock Procurement
- Comparison of CIF Dar es Salaam prices paid by
GRZ in 2008 2009 with reference (spot) prices
shows over-payment - The total overcharge vs good international
practice was..US 93 million over the two years
(Matthews 2010), or 12.5 of total CIF costs
12Indeni Refinery
- Processing Fee
- Actual fee paid by GRZ 8 / barrel
- Good practice fee 4 / barrel
- Refinery Loss
- Actual 10
- Good practice 5 maximum
13If good practice was followed in procurement
(spot prices), processing (4) losses (5),
2009 pump prices would have been lower by
- Petrol 19
- Diesel 17
- Kerosene 21
14Even if optimally operated, Indeni is too small
to compete with modern refineries
- Economies of scale are particularly important
for refining..As a basic rule of thumb, a
refinery needs to have a processing capacity of
at least 5 million tonnes a year to be
economic in a liberalized market. .A
sub-economic-scale refinery is unlikely to be
able to compete with product imports from large
and efficiently run refineries (Kojima et al,
2010) - Indenis capacity is 1.1 million tonnes pa
15Indeni only survives through tariff protection
from imports
- Import duty
- finished products - 25
- crude for Indeni - 5
- So Indeni / GRZ can - do sell for up to 20
more than price of imported finished products - Consumer pays for inefficiency
- When Indeni has unplanned shutdowns, duty on
finished products is waived and prices fall
16Distribution throughout Zambia by OMCs from a
single point, Indeni, increases transport costs
and supply risks
- Chipata is 900 km from Ndola, but only 140 km
from Lilongwe - Fuel costs are lower in Malawi
- Can Eastern Province obtain supplies more cheaply
through Malawi?
17Security of Supply
- Unplanned shutdowns at Indeni mean the whole
country runs out of fuel - High disruption costs
- Without substantial investment, more frequent
shutdowns are likely - Direct imports to different provinces reduce risk
of supply disruptions
18Monopoly
- TAZAMA / Indeni is a monopoly supplier
- Monopolies usually have higher costs prices
than competitive markets
19Why is GRZ involved?
- No market failure OMCs will supply
- Most governments in region leave fuel supply to
OMCs - Paying for feedstock can disrupt budget releases
to conventional public services - Fiscal loss / unbudgeted subsidy of US 90
million in 2009
20Liberalisation can reduce pump prices increase
reliability without hurting GRZ revenue
- Removing Indenis tariff protection encouraging
OMCs to import finished products directly means - Improved efficiency from competition
- Lower transport costs, as provinces are served
from nearest port (eg Eastern - Nacala, Lusaka
Beira, Northern Dar) - End of nationwide shortages
- No further public investment (except storage), so
GRZ can focus on public services
21Jobs
- Liberalisation means closing TAZAMA (260 jobs)
Indeni (320). However, reducing fuel costs by,
say, 15 improving reliability of supplies
should create far more jobs - Directly in OMCs
- Indirectly, by improving productivity
competitiveness of Zambian economy
22Should GRZ sell shares in Indeni?
- GRZ paid Total 5.5 million in 2009 for its 50
shareholding - Indeni can only make profits at expense of
consumers - Shares only have value if protection maintained
- Selling shares may entrench protection
23Uniform Petroleum Pricing
- Introduced September 2010
- Transport margin between wholesale pump price
equalised throughout Zambia - Consumers in Copperbelt Lusaka subsidise
those far from Indeni - Another price distortion, but minor compared to
Indeni monopoly -
24Conclusions
- Current system represents massive waste of public
private resources - Undermines international competitiveness
- Increases poverty
- Liberalisation should both cut costs/prices
improve reliability - without hurting revenue - Need for informed public debate planned
transition