Math 210G Mathematics Appreciation Dr. Joe Lakey Lecture 5: Su Voto es Su Voz - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

Math 210G Mathematics Appreciation Dr. Joe Lakey Lecture 5: Su Voto es Su Voz

Description:

Math 210G Mathematics Appreciation Dr. Joe Lakey Lecture 5: Su Voto es Su Voz [The president is elected by ] [Popular vote] [Electoral college] [Who has the most ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: rsm8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Math 210G Mathematics Appreciation Dr. Joe Lakey Lecture 5: Su Voto es Su Voz


1
Math 210G Mathematics AppreciationDr. Joe
LakeyLecture 5 Su Voto es Su Voz
2
The president is elected by
  1. Popular vote
  2. Electoral college
  3. Who has the most money
  4. Who has the most popular running mate

3
Sarah Palin Tina Fey?
4
(No Transcript)
5
Electoral college
  • Each state is allocated as many electors as it
    has Representatives and Senators in the United
    States Congress.

6
2004 Kerry v Bush
7
Who ran against G.W. Bush in 2000
  1. Clinton
  2. Hart
  3. Quail
  4. Gore

8
270 to Win 2000 Gore V Bush
9
The infamous butterfly ballot
10
Florida election tallies (2000)
George W. Bush (W) 2,912,790 (50,456,002) 48.850 Republican
Al Gore 2,912,253 (50,999,897) 48.841 Democratic
Ralph Nader 97,421 (2,882,955) 1.633 Green

11
(No Transcript)
12
The electoral college
13
Battleground states
  • NV (5, bare dem)
  • CO (9, bare dem)
  • NM (5, weak dem)
  • MO (11, barely GOP)
  • IN (11, barely GOP)
  • OH (20, weak dem)
  • VA (13, barely dem
  • FL (27, barely dem)
  • NH (4, barely dem)
  • NC (15, tied)

14
For McCain to win
  • 103 strong GOP 60 weak GOP163
  • 22 barely GOP 185
  • 15 tied 200
  • Barely dem 78 278

15
Historical observation
  • GOP almost always wins toss-ups
  • This means GOP would winall weakly barely
    GOPtied FL
  • These would put at 227
  • If we add OH 247
  • McCain needs 23 from
  • NV (5, bare dem), CO (9, bare dem), NM (5, weak
    dem),VA (13, barely dem),NH (4, barely dem)

16
(No Transcript)
17
(Penrose)-Banzhaf-(Coleman) power index
  • Banzhaf, John F. (1965), "Weighted voting doesn't
    work A mathematical analysis", Rutgers Law
    Review 19(2) 317-343
  • Example (Game Theory and Strategy P. D.
    Straffin)
  • 6 A4, B3, C2, D1
  • 6 votes to pass, possible majorities
  • AB, AC, ABC, ABD, ACD, BCD, ABCD
  • 12 total swing votes.
  • A 5/12 B 3/12 C 3/12 D 1/12

18
  • The Banzhaf Power Index a mathematical
    representation of how likely a single state would
    be able to swing the vote
  • Larger states have more power
  • Is the electoral college fair?
  • Does it reflect popular opinion?

19
The Banzhaf Power Index (Bachrach et al 08)
  • Pivotal (critical) agent in a winning coalition
    is an agent that causes the coalition to lose
    when removed from it
  • The Banzhaf Power Index of an agent is the
    portion of all coalitions where the agent is
    pivotal (critical)

20
The Shapley-Shubik Index
  • The portion of all permutations where the agent
    is pivotal
  • Direct application of the Shapley value for
    simple coalitional games

21
  • Banzhaf calculator for electoral college

22
Swing Vote 2008 Link
23
Daily electoral map
  • Conditional expectation
  • How does the power index change when we fix the
    weights for all states not considered
    battleground states?
  • Can New Mexico determine the outcome of the
    election?

24
Historical observation
  • GOP almost always wins toss-ups
  • This means GOP would winall weakly barely
    GOPtied FL
  • These would put at 227
  • If we add OH 247
  • McCain needs 23 from
  • NV (5, bare dem), CO (9, bare dem), NM (5, weak
    dem),VA (13, barely dem),NH (4, barely dem)

25
Banzhaf calculation
  • Can NM swing the vote?
  • 23 VA(13), CO(9), NV(5), NM(5), NH(4)

26
VACO forms a winning coalition 23 VA(13),
CO(9), NV(5), NM(5), NH(4)
  1. True
  2. False

27
All but VA forms a winning coalition 23
VA(13), CO(9), NV(5), NM(5), NH(4)
  1. True
  2. False

28
If you were to vote today, who would you choose
for president
  1. McCain/Palin
  2. Obama/Biden
  3. Cynthia McKinney/Rosa Clemente (Green)
  4. Bob Barr / Wayne Allen Root (Libertarian)
  5. Other or Undecided

29
(MALES ONLY) Who would you choose for president
today
  1. McCain/Palin
  2. Obama/Biden
  3. Cynthia McKinney/Rosa Clemente (Green)
  4. Bob Barr / Wayne Allen Root (Libertarian)
  5. Other or Undecided

30
(FEMALES ONLY) Who would you choose for
president today
  1. McCain/Palin
  2. Obama/Biden
  3. Cynthia McKinney/Rosa Clemente (Green)
  4. Bob Barr / Wayne Allen Root (Libertarian)
  5. Other or Undecided

31
Does your vote matter?
  1. Yes
  2. No

32
Swing votes
33
(No Transcript)
34
Is election fraud possible in America?
  • http//www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm

35
Voting systems
36
Plurality voting system
  • Plurality voting is used in 43 of the 191
    countries in the United Nations for either local
    or national elections.
  • In single winner plurality voting, each voter is
    allowed to vote for only one candidate, and the
    winner of the election is whichever candidate
    represents a plurality of voters, that is,
    whoever received the largest number of votes.
  • it is however very contentious to draw district
    boundary lines in this system
  • Plurality voting is based on minimal information

37
Example class president election (compare to
Bush, Gore, Nader)
  • The election for class president
  • Each class has a president, who sits on a school
    council. Further assume that, in this imaginary
    school. Male and female students disagree on many
    issues students prefer to vote for candidates of
    their gender.
  • Three candidates Amy, Brian and Cathy. Each
    class member gets a ballot, with these three
    names on it. Each voter must put an "X" by one of
    the names on their ballot.
  • Votes for Amy, for Brian, and for Cathy placed in
    separate piles.

38
Candidate Amy Brian Cathy
votes 11 16 13
39
Brian Wins
  • with only 40 of the vote
  • Electors only vote once

40
Plurality voting
  • Suppose that candidates are ranked (1-3). Then
    Brian might be the favorite of fewer than half
    the voters.
  • In some systems a runoff election among the top
    placing voters is called for.

41
advantages/disadvantages
  • OMOV
  • Constituency
  • Tactical voting
  • Party effects (block voting)
  • Wasted votes (lt majority)
  • Manipulation

42
Multiple step voting
  • Runoffs
  • Diminish tactical voting
  • Majority rule (if enough steps)
  • Voter burnout

43
Single transferable vote a compromise
  • Heres an example
  • The student council wants to organize a rock
    concert
  • A list of 5 bands is considered as candidates but
    the council can only afford 3 bands. There are
    twenty council members who list their preferences

44
Only first two preferences shown
council members xxxx xx xxxx xxxx xxxx x x
1st preference The Shins The Kills Fiery Furnaces Fiery Furnaces Fujiya Miyagi The Bug
2nd preference The Shins Fujiya Miyagi The Bug
45
Setting the quota
  • Droop quota
  • (votes/(seats1))1 20/416

46
Finding the winners
  • Any candidate who has reached or exceeded the
    required quota is declared elected
  • If not enough candidates have been elected, the
    count continues.
  • If a candidate has more votes than the quota,
    then their surplus is transferred to other
    candidates according to the next preference on
    each voter's ballot.
  • If no one meets the quota, the candidate with the
    fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are
    transferred.
  • Repeat from first step until the seats are filled

47
Round 1
  • Fiery furnace meet the quota. They are chosen

48
Round 2
  • Furnace excess transferred to Fujiya and Bug
    based on second choices. No quota. The Kills
    eliminated

49
Round 3
  • Kills votes transferred to second choice. Shins
    reach quota no extra votes

50
Round 4
  • No remaining candidate meets quota. The Bug
    eliminated

51
(No Transcript)
52
Candidate The Shins The Kills Fiery Furnaces Fujiya Miyagi The Bug
Round 1 xxxx xx xxxx xxxx xxxx x x Furnaces meet quota elected
Round 2 xxxx xx xxxx xx xxxx x xxx Furnace excess transferred to Fujiya and Bug based on second choices. No quota. Kills eliminated
Round 3 xxxx xx xxxx xx xxxx x xxx Kills votes transferred to second choice. Shins reach quota no extra votes
Round 4 xxxx xx xxxx xx xxxx x xxx No remaining candidate meets quota. Bug eliminated
53
Call for nominations
  • Im going to conduct a popularity poll
  • I need six (6) nominations for Favorite Bands of
    Math 210
  • Prior American Idol winners not allowed
  • Your homework figure out the top 3 bands based
    on the STV method

54
Recap
  • Mathematics seeks optimal solution
  • Voting optimally represent public opinion
  • No voting system is perfect
  • Outcome often depends on system employed

55
Lattice models for opinion
  • Renormalization in physics
  • Ising/Potts model applet renormalization group
    algorithm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com